Institution
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Healthcare•Toronto, Ontario, Canada•
About: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is a healthcare organization based out in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 7689 authors who have published 15236 publications receiving 523019 citations. The organization is also known as: Sunnybrook.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Health care, Breast cancer, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: After 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, breast‐cancer recurrences continued to occur steadily throughout the study period from 5 to 20 years, with risks ranging from 10 to 41%, depending on TN status and tumor grade.
Abstract: BackgroundThe administration of endocrine therapy for 5 years substantially reduces recurrence rates during and after treatment in women with early-stage, estrogen-receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. Extending such therapy beyond 5 years offers further protection but has additional side effects. Obtaining data on the absolute risk of subsequent distant recurrence if therapy stops at 5 years could help determine whether to extend treatment. MethodsIn this meta-analysis of the results of 88 trials involving 62,923 women with ER-positive breast cancer who were disease-free after 5 years of scheduled endocrine therapy, we used Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses, stratified according to trial and treatment, to assess the associations of tumor diameter and nodal status (TN), tumor grade, and other factors with patients’ outcomes during the period from 5 to 20 years. ResultsBreast-cancer recurrences occurred at a steady rate throughout the study period from 5 to 20 years. The risk of distant recurrence w...
929 citations
••
Sheba Medical Center1, University of California, Los Angeles2, Royal North Shore Hospital3, Aix-Marseille University4, university of lille5, University of California, San Francisco6, University of Sydney7, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital8, Hebrew University of Jerusalem9, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust10, University of Manchester11, Netherlands Cancer Institute12, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre13, Merck & Co.14, University of Paris-Sud15
TL;DR: The final protocol-specified survival analysis as mentioned in this paper showed that pembrolizumab continued to provide superior overall survival versus ipilimumab, with no difference between the two dosing schedules.
904 citations
••
TL;DR: This review highlights issues to consider when implementing a CRC screening programme and gives a worldwide overview of CRC burden and the current status of screening programmes, with focus on international differences.
Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third among the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, with wide geographical variation in incidence and mortality across the world. Despite proof that screening can decrease CRC incidence and mortality, CRC screening is only offered to a small proportion of the target population worldwide. Throughout the world there are widespread differences in CRC screening implementation status and strategy. Differences can be attributed to geographical variation in CRC incidence, economic resources, healthcare structure and infrastructure to support screening such as the ability to identify the target population at risk and cancer registry availability. This review highlights issues to consider when implementing a CRC screening programme and gives a worldwide overview of CRC burden and the current status of screening programmes, with focus on international differences.
887 citations
••
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center1, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre2, University of Kentucky3, Masaryk University4, Novartis5, University of Manchester6, Sapienza University of Rome7, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven8, Netherlands Cancer Institute9, Seoul National University Hospital10, Harvard University11, Charité12
TL;DR: Everolimus is the first targeted agent to show robust anti-tumour activity with acceptable tolerability across a broad range of neuroendocrine tumours, including those arising from the pancreas, lung, and gastrointestinal tract.
881 citations
••
TL;DR: Evidence of moderate quality of the effectiveness of LHWs in promoting immunisation childhood uptake is found and low quality evidence that LHWs may reduce child morbidity is found.
Abstract: Background
Lay health workers (LHWs) are widely used to provide care for a broad range of health issues. Little is known, however, about the effectiveness of LHW interventions.
Objectives
To assess the effects of LHW interventions in primary and community health care on maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases.
Search methods
For the current version of this review we searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (including citations uploaded from the EPOC and the CCRG registers) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 1 Online) (searched 18 February 2009); MEDLINE, Ovid (1950 to February Week 1 2009) (searched 17 February 2009); MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid (February 13 2009) (searched 17 February 2009); EMBASE, Ovid (1980 to 2009 Week 05) (searched 18 February 2009); AMED, Ovid (1985 to February 2009) (searched 19 February 2009); British Nursing Index and Archive, Ovid (1985 to February 2009) (searched 17 February 2009); CINAHL, Ebsco 1981 to present (searched 07 February 2010); POPLINE (searched 25 February 2009); WHOLIS (searched 16 April 2009); Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index (ISI Web of Science) (1975 to present) (searched 10 August 2006 and 10 February 2010). We also searched the reference lists of all included papers and relevant reviews, and contacted study authors and researchers in the field for additional papers.
Selection criteria
Randomised controlled trials of any intervention delivered by LHWs (paid or voluntary) in primary or community health care and intended to improve maternal or child health or the management of infectious diseases. A 'lay health worker' was defined as any health worker carrying out functions related to healthcare delivery, trained in some way in the context of the intervention, and having no formal professional or paraprofessional certificate or tertiary education degree. There were no restrictions on care recipients.
Data collection and analysis
Two review authors independently extracted data using a standard form and assessed risk of bias. Studies that compared broadly similar types of interventions were grouped together. Where feasible, the study results were combined and an overall estimate of effect obtained.
Main results
Eighty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. These showed considerable diversity in the targeted health issue and the aims, content, and outcomes of interventions. The majority were conducted in high income countries (n = 55) but many of these focused on low income and minority populations. The diversity of included studies limited meta-analysis to outcomes for four study groups. These analyses found evidence of moderate quality of the effectiveness of LHWs in promoting immunisation childhood uptake (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.37; P = 0.0004); promoting initiation of breastfeeding (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.61; P < 0.00001), any breastfeeding (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.39; P = 0.0004), and exclusive breastfeeding (RR 2.78, 95% CI 1.74 to 4.44; P <0.0001); and improving pulmonary TB cure rates (RR 1.22 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.31) P <0.0001), when compared to usual care. There was moderate quality evidence that LHW support had little or no effect on TB preventive treatment completion (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.09; P = 0.99). There was also low quality evidence that LHWs may reduce child morbidity (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99; P = 0.03) and child (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.03; P = 0.07) and neonatal (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.02; P = 0.07) mortality, and increase the likelihood of seeking care for childhood illness (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.05; P = 0.20). For other health issues, the evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions regarding effectiveness, or to enable the identification of specific LHW training or intervention strategies likely to be most effective.
Authors' conclusions
LHWs provide promising benefits in promoting immunisation uptake and breastfeeding, improving TB treatment outcomes, and reducing child morbidity and mortality when compared to usual care. For other health issues, evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions about the effects of LHWs.
875 citations
Authors
Showing all 7765 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Gordon B. Mills | 187 | 1273 | 186451 |
David A. Bennett | 167 | 1142 | 109844 |
Bruce R. Rosen | 148 | 684 | 97507 |
Robert Tibshirani | 147 | 593 | 326580 |
Steven A. Narod | 134 | 970 | 84638 |
Peter Palese | 132 | 526 | 57882 |
Gideon Koren | 129 | 1994 | 81718 |
John B. Holcomb | 120 | 733 | 53760 |
Julie A. Schneider | 118 | 492 | 56843 |
Patrick Maisonneuve | 118 | 582 | 53363 |
Mitch Dowsett | 114 | 478 | 62453 |
Ian D. Graham | 113 | 700 | 87848 |
Peter C. Austin | 112 | 657 | 60156 |
Sandra E. Black | 104 | 681 | 51755 |
Michael B. Yaffe | 102 | 379 | 41663 |