scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Portsmouth

EducationPortsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
About: University of Portsmouth is a education organization based out in Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Galaxy. The organization has 5452 authors who have published 14256 publications receiving 424346 citations. The organization is also known as: Portsmouth and Gosport School of Science and Art & Portsmouth and Gosport School of Science and the Arts.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a farm level panel data from Ethiopia and a comprehensive empirical strategy to investigate the contribution of crop biodiversity on food production and found that increasing the number of crop variety increases production.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The role of the complement pathway and particularly C5a and its aberrations in highly pathogenic virus infections are described, and therefore its potential as a therapeutic target in COVID‐19 is described.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2006-Infancy
TL;DR: This paper explored the assumptions in the definitions and methods of self-recognition assessments in the 30 years since these initial studies, and charted the divergence between the developmental mark test and the comparative mark test.
Abstract: The objective study of self-recognition, with a mirror and a mark applied to the face, was conducted independently by Gallup (1970) for use with chimpanzees and monkeys, and by Amsterdam (1972) for use with infant humans. Comparative psychologists have followed the model (and assumptions) set by Gallup, whereas developmental psychologists have followed a different model (e.g., Lewis & Brooks-Gunn, 1979). This article explores the assumptions in the definitions and methods of self-recognition assessments in the 30 years since these initial studies, and charts the divergence between the developmental mark test and the comparative mark test. Two new studies, 1 with infant chimpanzees and 1 with infant humans, illustrate a reconciliation of the 2 approaches. Overt application of the mark, or other procedures related to how the mark is discovered, did not enhance mirror selfrecognition. In contrast, maternal scaffolding appears to enhance performance, perhaps by eliciting well-rehearsed verbal responses (i.e., naming self). When comparable testing procedures and assessment criteria are used, chimpanzee and human infants perform comparably. A combined developmental comparative approach allows us to suggest that mirror self-recognition may be based on a specific aspect of mental representation, the cognitive ability to symbolize.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2002-Area
TL;DR: Commentary that has emerged out of debates that have taken place within a body of literature usually identified as the critical ‘new’ public health is drawn on to argue that such scholarship offers crucial insights for the production of a critical geography of public health.
Abstract: Following the move to a ‘post–medical’ geography, a large amount of research has come to focus on public health issues. This paper explores these current geographies of public health and argues for the development of a more critical perspective. In particular, it draws on commentary that has emerged out of debates that have taken place within a body of literature usually identified as the critical ‘new’ public health. The paper goes on to argue that such scholarship offers crucial insights for the production of a critical geography of public health.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors assesses what is meant by employability and how the Government has integrated its "supply side" approach to the unemployed with the stricter benefit regime inherited from its Conservative predecessor, and highlights some of the weaknesses of the new strategy and draws out the implications that existing evaluations of active labour market programmes have for the likely impact of the New Deals.
Abstract: Britain’s New Labour Government has radically shifted its policy aims away from securing traditional full employment towards the improvement of “employability”. This paper briefly assesses what is meant by employability and how the Government has integrated its “supply side” approach to the unemployed with the stricter benefit regime it inherited from its Conservative predecessor. It describes the various New Deal and area‐based employment programmes that have been introduced during an intense phase of policy development and experimentation and outlines the immediate impact they have had. The Government’s long‐term aim is to build on this experience and create a “work‐based welfare state” for all those of working age who receive state benefits. In conclusion, the paper highlights some of the weaknesses of the new strategy and draws out the implications that existing evaluations of active labour market programmes have for the likely impact of the New Deals.

115 citations


Authors

Showing all 5624 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Robert C. Nichol187851162994
Gavin Davies1592036149835
Daniel Thomas13484684224
Will J. Percival12947387752
Claudia Maraston10336259178
I. W. Harry9831265338
Timothy Clark95113753665
Kevin Schawinski9537630207
Ashley J. Ross9024846395
Josep Call9045134196
David A. Wake8921446124
L. K. Nuttall8925354834
Stephen Neidle8945732417
Andrew Lundgren8824957347
Rita Tojeiro8722943140
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Sheffield
102.9K papers, 3.9M citations

94% related

University of Birmingham
115.3K papers, 4.3M citations

93% related

University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

93% related

University of Leeds
101.8K papers, 3.6M citations

92% related

University of Nottingham
119.6K papers, 4.2M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202363
2022282
2021961
2020976
2019905
2018850