Institution
University of the Aegean
Education•Mytilene, Greece•
About: University of the Aegean is a education organization based out in Mytilene, Greece. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 2818 authors who have published 8100 publications receiving 179275 citations. The organization is also known as: UAEG.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, a combination of the inclusive deep inelastic cross sections measured by the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations in neutral and charged current unpolarised e(+/-)p scattering at HERA during the period 1994-2000 is presented.
Abstract: A combination is presented of the inclusive deep inelastic cross sections measured by the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations in neutral and charged current unpolarised e(+/-)p scattering at HERA during the period 1994-2000. The data span six orders of magnitude in negative four-momentum-transfer squared, Q(2), and in Bjorken x. The combination method used takes the correlations of systematic uncertainties into account, resulting in an improved accuracy. The combined data are the sole input in a NLO QCD analysis which determines a new set of parton distributions, HERAPDF1.0, with small experimental uncertainties. This set includes an estimate of the model and parametrisation uncertainties of the fit result.
624 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the spin and parity quantum numbers of the Higgs boson were studied based on the collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, and the results showed that the standard model spin-parity J(...
608 citations
••
TL;DR: The various ways in which the term ‘interaction strength’ has been applied are described and the implications of loose terminology and definition for the development of this field are discussed.
Abstract: Summary 1. Recent efforts to understand how the patterning of interaction strength affects both structure and dynamics in food webs have highlighted several obstacles to productive synthesis. Issues arise with respect to goals and driving questions, methods and approaches, and placing results in the context of broader ecological theory. 2. Much confusion stems from lack of clarity about whether the questions posed relate to community-level patterns or to species dynamics, and to what authors actually mean by the term ‘interaction strength’. Here, we describe the various ways in which this term has been applied and discuss the implications of loose terminology and definition for the development of this field. 3. Of particular concern is the clear gap between theoretical and empirical investigations of interaction strengths and food web dynamics. The ecological community urgently needs to explore new ways to estimate biologically reasonable model coefficients from empirical data, such as foraging rates, body size, metabolic rate, biomass distribution and other species traits. 4. Combining numerical and analytical modelling approaches should allow exploration of the conditions under which different interaction strengths metrics are interchangeable with regard to relative magnitude, system responses, and species identity. 5. Finally, the prime focus on predator‐prey links in much of the research to date on interaction strengths in food webs has meant that the potential significance of nontrophic interactions, such as competition, facilitation and biotic disturbance, has been largely ignored by the food web community. Such interactions may be important dynamically and should be routinely included in future food web research programmes.
594 citations
••
TL;DR: The drivers behind current rises in the use of low-cost sensors for air pollution management in cities are illustrated, while addressing the major challenges for their effective implementation.
591 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper offers to researchers a link to a public image database to define a common reference point for LPR algorithmic assessment and issues such as processing time, computational power, and recognition rate are addressed.
Abstract: License plate recognition (LPR) algorithms in images or videos are generally composed of the following three processing steps: 1) extraction of a license plate region; 2) segmentation of the plate characters; and 3) recognition of each character This task is quite challenging due to the diversity of plate formats and the nonuniform outdoor illumination conditions during image acquisition Therefore, most approaches work only under restricted conditions such as fixed illumination, limited vehicle speed, designated routes, and stationary backgrounds Numerous techniques have been developed for LPR in still images or video sequences, and the purpose of this paper is to categorize and assess them Issues such as processing time, computational power, and recognition rate are also addressed, when available Finally, this paper offers to researchers a link to a public image database to define a common reference point for LPR algorithmic assessment
575 citations
Authors
Showing all 2889 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
B. G. Pope | 125 | 926 | 75215 |
C. Guicheney | 88 | 271 | 37715 |
Konstantinos Papageorgiou | 83 | 365 | 22316 |
Ioannis Gkialas | 83 | 316 | 21400 |
Konstantinos Papageorgiou | 71 | 280 | 17500 |
Th. D. Papadopoulou | 70 | 272 | 32541 |
Ioannis Gkialas | 70 | 268 | 16867 |
Mikael Johansson | 65 | 526 | 18329 |
Penelope Vounatsou | 63 | 242 | 11944 |
Nikolaos S. Thomaidis | 57 | 275 | 10388 |
Camilla Di Donato | 57 | 185 | 9481 |
Nicholas Apergis | 56 | 445 | 14876 |
Polychronis C Tzedakis | 54 | 106 | 8982 |
Stelios Katsanevakis | 47 | 183 | 7680 |
Diomidis Spinellis | 45 | 314 | 7819 |