Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography
Sarah M. Friedewald,Elizabeth A. Rafferty,Stephen L. Rose,Melissa A. Durand,Donna Plecha,Julianne S. Greenberg,Mary Katherine Hayes,Debra S. Copit,Kara L. Carlson,Thomas M. Cink,Lora D. Barke,Linda N. Greer,Dave P. Miller,Emily F. Conant +13 more
TLDR
Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography was associated with a decrease in recall rate and an increase in cancer detection rate, and further studies are needed to assess the relationship to clinical outcomes.Abstract:
mammography + tomosynthesis; difference, 1.3 (95% CI, 0.4-2.1; P = .004); for cancer detection, 4.2 (95% CI, 3.8-4.7) with digital mammography vs 5.4 (95% CI, 4.9-6.0) with digital mammography + tomosynthesis; difference, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.8-1.6; P < .001); and for invasive cancer detection, 2.9 (95% CI, 2.5-3.2) with digital mammography vs 4.1 (95% CI, 3.7-4.5) with digital mammography + tomosynthesis; difference, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.8-1.6; P < .001). The in situ cancer detection rate was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.6) per 1000 screens with both methods. Adding tomosynthesis was associated with an increase in the positive predictive value for recall from 4.3% to 6.4% (difference, 2.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-2.5%; P < .001) and for biopsy from 24.2% to 29.2% (difference, 5.0%; 95% CI, 3.0%-7.0%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography was associated with a decrease in recall rate and an increase in cancer detection rate. Further studies are needed to assess the relationship to clinical outcomes.read more
Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Oculomotor behavior of radiologists reading digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
Nicholas M. D'Ardenne,Robert M. Nishikawa,Margarita L. Zuley,Chia-Chien Wu,Jeremy M. Wolfe,Jeremy M. Wolfe +5 more
TL;DR: Different observers where shown to have differing search patterns however it was not possible to show any observer to have a true driller or scanner technique; more work would be needed to obtain conclusions as to optimal search strategies.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Diagnostic radiation dose after the implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis screening
TL;DR: While the AGD for calcifications remained the same after the transition, a dose increase of 23% was found due to the addition of 3D imaging for the other findings, resulting in a net increase of only 4.0% in the total radiation dose to the screening population arising from diagnostic imaging at recall.
Journal ArticleDOI
Advances in Breast Imaging with Current Screening Recommendations and Controversies.
Cimmie Shahan,Ginger Layne +1 more
TL;DR: In this article , the current status of breast imaging in the screening and diagnostic settings and is intended to inform the referring physician of why and how common studies and procedures are performed in the breast imaging clinic.
Posted Content
A Multi-site Study of a Breast Density Deep Learning Model for Full-field Digital Mammography Images and Synthetic Mammography Images
Thomas P. Matthews,Sadanand Singh,Brent Mombourquette,Jason Su,Meet Shah,Stefano Pedemonte,Aaron Long,David Maffit,Jenny Gurney,Rodrigo Morales Hoil,Nikita Ghare,Douglas Smith,Stephen M. Moore,Susan C. Marks,Richard L. Wahl +14 more
TL;DR: A BI-RADS breast density DL model demonstrated strong performance on FFDM and SM images from two institutions without training on SM images and improved by using few SM images.
Journal ArticleDOI
Interest of systematic tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening.
Mathieu Liberatore,Jean-Michel Cucchi,Martine Fighiera,Anne Binet,Marie Christine Missana,Philippe Brunner,Michel Yves Mourou,Antoine Iannessi +7 more
TL;DR: These results validate a modern strategy for breast cancer screening supported by two views of DBT with sDM, a synthetized two-dimensional digital mammography (sDM) obtained from DBT to replace the FFDM.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography
Debbie Saslow,Carla Boetes,Wylie Burke,Steven E. Harms,Martin O. Leach,Constance D. Lehman,Elizabeth A. Morris,Etta D. Pisano,Mitchell D. Schnall,Stephen F. Sener,Robert A. Smith,Ellen Warner,Martin J. Yaffe,Kimberly S. Andrews,Christy A. Russell +14 more
TL;DR: There are several risk subgroups for which the available data are insufficient to recommend for or against screening, including women with a personal history of breast cancer, carcinoma in situ, atypical hyperplasia, and extremely dense breasts on mammography.
Journal ArticleDOI
Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
TL;DR: Although lung cancer screening is not an alternative to smoking cessation, the USPSTF found adequate evidence that annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in a defined population of high-risk persons can prevent a substantial number of lung cancerrelated deaths.
Journal ArticleDOI
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
Etta D. Pisano,Constantine Gatsonis,Edward Hendrick,Martin J. Yaffe,Janet K. Baum,Suddhasatta Acharyya,Emily F. Conant,Laurie L. Fajardo,Lawrence W. Bassett,Roberta A. Jong,Murray Rebner +10 more
TL;DR: The overall diagnostic accuracy of digital and film mammography as a means of screening for breast cancer is similar, but digital mammography is more accurate in women under the age of 50 years, women with radiographically dense breasts, and premenopausal or perimenopausal women.
Journal ArticleDOI
Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Ned Calonge,Diana B. Petitti,Thomas G. DeWitt,Allen J. Dietrich,Kimberly D. Gregory,David C. Grossman,George Isham,Michael L. LeFevre,Rosanne M. Leipzig,Lucy N. Marion,Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,Virginia A. Moyer,Judith K. Ockene,George F. Sawaya,J. Sanford Schwartz,Timothy J Wilt,US Preventive Serv Task Force +16 more
TL;DR: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess additional benefits and harms of either digital mammography or magnetic resonance imaging instead of film mammography as screening modalities for breast cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
Wendie A. Berg,Jeffrey D. Blume,Jean B. Cormack,Ellen B. Mendelson,Daniel Lehrer,M. Böhm-Vélez,Etta D. Pisano,Roberta A. Jong,W. Phil Evans,Marilyn J. Morton,Mary C. Mahoney,Linda Hovanessian Larsen,Richard G. Barr,Dione M. Farria,Helga S. Marques,Karan Boparai +15 more
TL;DR: The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy (assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of combined mammography plus ultrasound vs mammography alone and the positive predictive value of biopsy recommendations for mammographyplus ultrasound vs Mammography alone are compared.