scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Buparlisib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (BELLE-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

TLDR
This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer, including an evaluation of the PI3K pathway activation status as a biomarker for clinical benefit.
Abstract
Summary Background Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation is a hallmark of endocrine therapy-resistant, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer, including an evaluation of the PI3K pathway activation status as a biomarker for clinical benefit Methods The BELLE-2 trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor (HER2)-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had progressed on or after aromatase inhibitor treatment and had received up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were included Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using interactive voice response technology (block size of 6) on day 15 of cycle 1 to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg/day) or matching placebo, starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles Patients were assigned randomisation numbers with a validated interactive response technology; these numbers were linked to different treatment groups which in turn were linked to treatment numbers PI3K status in tumour tissue was determined via central laboratory during a 14-day run-in phase Randomisation was stratified by PI3K pathway activation status (activated vs non-activated vs and unknown) and visceral disease status (present vs absent) Patients, investigators, local radiologists, study team, and anyone involved in the study were masked to the identity of the treatment until unblinding The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 11) in the total population, in patients with known (activated or non-activated) PI3K pathway status, and in PI3K pathway-activated patients Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment according to the treatment they received This trial is registered with ClinicalTrialsgov, number NCT01610284, and is currently ongoing but not recruiting participants Findings Between Sept 7, 2012, and Sept 10, 2014, 1147 patients from 267 centres in 29 countries were randomly assigned to receive buparlisib (n=576) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n=571) In the total patient population (n=1147), median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·8–7·8) in the buparlisib group versus 5·0 months (4·0–5·2) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·67–0·89]; one-sided p=0·00021) In patients with known PI3K status (n=851), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·0–7·0) in the buparlisib group vs 4·5 months (3·3–5·0) in the placebo group (HR 0·80 [95% CI 0·68–0·94]; one-sided p=0·0033) In PI3K pathway-activated patients (n=372), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 4·9–7·1) in the buparlisib group versus 4·0 months (3·1–5·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [0·60–0·97], one-sided p=0·014) The most common grade 3–4 adverse events in the buparlisib group versus the placebo group were increased alanine aminotransferase (146 [25%] of 573 patients vs six [1%] of 570), increased aspartate aminotransferase (103 [18%] vs 16 [3%]), hyperglycaemia (88 [15%] vs one [ vs none) Serious adverse events were reported in 134 (23%) of 573 patients in the buparlisib group compared with 90 [16%] of 570 patients in the placebo group; the most common serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [3%] of 573 vs one [ vs one [ Interpretation The results from this study show that PI3K inhibition combined with endocrine therapy is effective in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer Use of more selective PI3K inhibitors, such as α-specific PI3K inhibitor, is warranted to further improve safety and benefit in this setting No further studies are being pursued because of the toxicity associated with this combination Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Under-served groups remain underserved as eligibility criteria routinely exclude them from breast cancer trials.

TL;DR: In this article , the authors assess eligibility criteria in published phase III breast cancer clinical trials to determine whether they excluded underserved groups either directly or indirectly, and find that 40 trials had multiple exclusions that affected the recruitment of under-served groups and clinical or scientific rationale for the recorded inclusion and exclusion criteria was underreported in 39 of 40 trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

An evidence-based review of the outcome of fulvestrant plus a targeted agent versus fulvestrant alone in treating hormone receptor-positive endocrine therapy-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

TL;DR: Pooled results indicate that adding a targeted agent to fulvestrant prolonged OS, PFS and ORR in relapse or metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer after prior endocrine therapy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alpelisib-induced thyroiditis in a patient with metastatic breast cancer: is routine monitoring of thyroid function required?

TL;DR: In this article , a 50-year-old woman was started on alpelisib, combined with fulvestrant, for the management of metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer following progression on previous therapy.
Journal ArticleDOI

PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer: from research to clinical practice

TL;DR: In this article , the authors reviewed clinical cases of the use of alpelsib in patients who previously received hormone therapy, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, for the treatment of postmenopausal women and men with HR+ HER2- PIK3CA-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer after prior therapy with aromatase inhibitors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multiple PIK3CA mutation clonality correlates with outcomes in taselisib + fulvestrant-treated ER+/HER2–, PIK3CA-mutated breast cancers

TL;DR: In this article , the role of multiple PIK3CA mutations in predicting response to p110α inhibition was investigated in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer enrolled in a clinical trial of fulvestrant ± taselisib.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular portraits of human breast tumours

TL;DR: Variation in gene expression patterns in a set of 65 surgical specimens of human breast tumours from 42 different individuals were characterized using complementary DNA microarrays representing 8,102 human genes, providing a distinctive molecular portrait of each tumour.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

Daniel C. Koboldt, +355 more
- 04 Oct 2012 - 
TL;DR: The ability to integrate information across platforms provided key insights into previously defined gene expression subtypes and demonstrated the existence of four main breast cancer classes when combining data from five platforms, each of which shows significant molecular heterogeneity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies

Chetan Bettegowda, +69 more
TL;DR: The ability of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect tumors in 640 patients with various cancer types was evaluated and suggested that ctDNA is a broadly applicable, sensitive, and specific biomarker that can be used for a variety of clinical and research purposes.
Related Papers (5)

Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

Daniel C. Koboldt, +355 more
- 04 Oct 2012 -