Microbiological Effects of Consuming a Synbiotic Containing Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Oligofructose in Elderly Persons, Determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Counting of Viable Bacteria
Sabine Bartosch,Emma J. Woodmansey,Jacqueline. C. M. Paterson,Marion E. T. McMurdo,George T. Macfarlane +4 more
TLDR
Synbiotic consumption increased the size and diversity of protective fecal bifidobacterial populations, which are often very much reduced in older people.Abstract:
Background Because of changes in gut physiology, immune system reactivity, and diet, elderly people are more susceptible to gastrointestinal infections than are younger adults. The gut microflora, which provides a natural defense against invading microorganisms, changes in elderly people with the development of potentially damaging bacterial populations, which may lead to alterations in bacterial metabolism and higher levels of infection. Methods A randomized, double-blind, controlled feeding trial was done with 18 healthy elderly volunteers (age, >62 years) using a synbiotic comprising Bifidobacterium bifidum BB-02 and Bifidobacterium lactis BL-01 (probiotics) together with an inulin-based prebiotic (Synergy 1; Orafti). Real-time PCR was employed to quantitate total bifidobacteria, B. bifidum, and B. lactis in fecal DNA before, during, and after synbiotic consumption. Counting all viable anaerobes, bifidobacteria, and lactobacilli and identification of bacterial isolates to species level was also done. Results Throughout feeding, both bifidobacteria species were detected in fecal samples obtained from all subjects receiving the synbiotic, with significant increases in the number of copies of the 16S rRNA genes of B. bifidum, B. lactis, and total bifidobacteria, compared with the control week and the placebo group. At least 1 of these species remained detectable in fecal samples 3 weeks after feeding in individuals that had no fecal B. bifidum and/or B. lactis in the control week, indicating that the probiotics persisted in the volunteers. Counting of viable organisms showed significantly higher total numbers of fecal bifidobacteria, total numbers of lactobacilli, and numbers of B. bifidum during synbiotic feeding. Conclusion Synbiotic consumption increased the size and diversity of protective fecal bifidobacterial populations, which are often very much reduced in older people.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Pervasive Effects of an Antibiotic on the Human Gut Microbiota, as Revealed by Deep 16S rRNA Sequencing
TL;DR: Ciprofloxacin treatment influenced the abundance of about a third of the bacterial taxa in the gut, decreasing the taxonomic richness, diversity, and evenness of the community, and support the hypothesis of functional redundancy in the human gut microbiota.
Journal ArticleDOI
Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut
TL;DR: The impact of dietary carbohydrates, including prebiotics, on human health requires understanding of the complex relationship between diet composition, the gut microbiota and metabolic outputs.
Book ChapterDOI
Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics
TL;DR: According to the German definition, probiotic microorganisms are defined viable microorganisms, sufficient amounts of which reach the intestine in an active state and thus exert positive health effects as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Bacterial metabolism and health-related effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and other prebiotics
TL;DR: Inulin-derived oligosaccharides and GOS are mildly laxative, but can result in flatulence and osmotic diarrhoea if taken in large amounts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Two Routes of Metabolic Cross-Feeding between Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Butyrate-Producing Anaerobes from the Human Gut
Álvaro Belenguer,Sylvia H. Duncan,A. Graham Calder,Grietje Holtrop,Petra Louis,Gerald Lobley,Harry J. Flint +6 more
TL;DR: It is concluded that two distinct mechanisms of metabolic cross- feeding between B. adolescentis and butyrate-forming bacteria may operate in gut ecosystems, one due to consumption of fermentation end products (lactate and acetate) and the other due to cross-feeding of partial breakdown products from complex substrates.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes.
TL;DR: A new PCR-based method for distinguishing human and cow fecal contamination in coastal waters without culturing indicator organisms is described and it is shown that the method can be used to track bacterial marker sequences in complex environments.
Journal ArticleDOI
Polymerase chain reaction detection of nonviable bacterial pathogens.
TL;DR: It is shown that PCR will detect nonviable cells, as long as intact target nucleic acid sequences are available and that care must be taken in the way samples are stored for future PCR amplifications and that filter sterilization of media is not acceptable for long-term preservation of samples for PCR.
Journal ArticleDOI
Distribution of Bifidobacterial Species in Human Intestinal Microflora Examined with 16S rRNA-Gene-Targeted Species-Specific Primers
TL;DR: Qualitative detection of the bifidobacterial species present in human feces can be accomplished rapidly and accurately and the species-specific PCR method was found to be a useful means for identifying B ifidobacteriumstrains isolated from human feces.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparison of real-time PCR with SYBR Green I or 5'-nuclease assays and dot-blot hybridization with rDNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes in quantification of selected faecal bacteria.
TL;DR: The results suggest that real-time PCR has a great potential for analysis of the faecal microflora and that dot-blot hybridization was easier and faster to perform and also proved to have a superior sensitivity.