M
Michael I. Jordan
Researcher at University of California, Berkeley
Publications - 1110
Citations - 241763
Michael I. Jordan is an academic researcher from University of California, Berkeley. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Inference. The author has an hindex of 176, co-authored 1016 publications receiving 216204 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael I. Jordan include Stanford University & Princeton University.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings Article
What is Local Optimality in Nonconvex-Nonconcave Minimax Optimization?
TL;DR: A proper mathematical definition of local optimality for this sequential setting---local minimax is proposed, as well as its properties and existence results are presented.
Proceedings Article
A kernelized stein discrepancy for goodness-of-fit tests
TL;DR: A new discrepancy statistic for measuring differences between two probability distributions is derived based on combining Stein's identity with the reproducing kernel Hilbert space theory and a new class of powerful goodness-of-fit tests are derived that are widely applicable for complex and high dimensional distributions.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Automating model search for large scale machine learning
TL;DR: An architecture for automatic machine learning at scale comprised of a cost-based cluster resource allocation estimator, advanced hyper-parameter tuning techniques, bandit resource allocation via runtime algorithm introspection, and physical optimization via batching and optimal resource allocation is proposed.
Posted Content
Near-Optimal Algorithms for Minimax Optimization
TL;DR: The current state-of-the-art first-order algorithm for strongly-convex-strongly-concave minimax problems is the algorithm of as discussed by the authors.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Communication-Efficient Online Detection of Network-Wide Anomalies
Ling Huang,XuanLong Nguyen,Minos Garofalakis,Joseph M. Hellerstein,Michael I. Jordan,Anthony D. Joseph,Nina Taft +6 more
TL;DR: This work proposes a novel approximation scheme that dramatically reduces the burden on the production network of a PCA-based anomaly detection scheme and selects the filtering parameters at local monitors such that the errors made by the detector are guaranteed to lie below a user-specified upper bound.