Institution
Eli Lilly and Company
Company•Indianapolis, Indiana, United States•
About: Eli Lilly and Company is a company organization based out in Indianapolis, Indiana, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Receptor. The organization has 17826 authors who have published 22835 publications receiving 946714 citations. The organization is also known as: Eli Lily.
Topics: Population, Receptor, Placebo, Insulin, Agonist
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This research discusses the many challenges that the team encountered during the development of fluoxetine hydrochloride, which has now been widely acknowledged as a breakthrough drug for depression.
Abstract: In the early 1970s, evidence of the role of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine or 5-HT) in depression began to emerge and the hypothesis that enhancing 5-HT neurotransmission would be a viable mechanism to mediate antidepressant response was put forward. On the basis of this hypothesis, efforts to develop agents that inhibit the uptake of 5-HT from the synaptic cleft were initiated. These studies led to the discovery and development of the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine hydrochloride (Prozac; Eli Lilly), which was approved for the treatment of depression by the US FDA in 1987. Here, we summarize this research and discuss the many challenges that we encountered during the development of fluoxetine hydrochloride, which has now been widely acknowledged as a breakthrough drug for depression.
305 citations
••
Fudan University1, University of Cologne2, Boston Children's Hospital3, Eli Lilly and Company4, fondazione bruno kessler5, AbbVie6, GlaxoSmithKline7, Rush University Medical Center8, Food and Drug Administration9, SAS Institute10, Marshfield Clinic11, Thomson Reuters12, Loma Linda University13, Emory University14, Children's Hospital Los Angeles15, Foundation Center16, German Cancer Research Center17, University of Nottingham18, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research19, University of Arkansas at Little Rock20, University of Valencia21, University of Padua22, Ghent University23, Georgia Institute of Technology24, Harvard University25, Stanford University26, University of North Dakota27, East China Normal University28, Beckman Research Institute29, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center30
TL;DR: It is demonstrated thatRNA-seq outperforms microarrays in determining the transcriptomic characteristics of cancer, while RNA-seq and microarray-based models perform similarly in clinical endpoint prediction.
Abstract: Gene expression profiling is being widely applied in cancer research to identify biomarkers for clinical endpoint prediction. Since RNA-seq provides a powerful tool for transcriptome-based applications beyond the limitations of microarrays, we sought to systematically evaluate the performance of RNA-seq-based and microarray-based classifiers in this MAQC-III/SEQC study for clinical endpoint prediction using neuroblastoma as a model. We generate gene expression profiles from 498 primary neuroblastomas using both RNA-seq and 44 k microarrays. Characterization of the neuroblastoma transcriptome by RNA-seq reveals that more than 48,000 genes and 200,000 transcripts are being expressed in this malignancy. We also find that RNA-seq provides much more detailed information on specific transcript expression patterns in clinico-genetic neuroblastoma subgroups than microarrays. To systematically compare the power of RNA-seq and microarray-based models in predicting clinical endpoints, we divide the cohort randomly into training and validation sets and develop 360 predictive models on six clinical endpoints of varying predictability. Evaluation of factors potentially affecting model performances reveals that prediction accuracies are most strongly influenced by the nature of the clinical endpoint, whereas technological platforms (RNA-seq vs. microarrays), RNA-seq data analysis pipelines, and feature levels (gene vs. transcript vs. exon-junction level) do not significantly affect performances of the models. We demonstrate that RNA-seq outperforms microarrays in determining the transcriptomic characteristics of cancer, while RNA-seq and microarray-based models perform similarly in clinical endpoint prediction. Our findings may be valuable to guide future studies on the development of gene expression-based predictive models and their implementation in clinical practice.
305 citations
••
TL;DR: A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate prescription drugs withdrawn from worldwide pharmaceutical markets over the past four decades due to safety reasons, finding that the most common categories of drugs withdrawn were: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, nonnarcotic analgesics, antidepressants, and vasodilators.
Abstract: A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate prescription drugs withdrawn from worldwide pharmaceutical markets over the past four decades due to safety reasons. The list of drugs, including indication, the duration of marketing, and reasons for withdrawal were examined. Among the 121 products identified, 42.1% were withdrawn from European markets alone, 5.0% from North America, 3.3% from Asia Pacific, and 49.6% from markets in multiple continents. Distributions of these withdrawals in each decade were: 12.4% from the 1960s, 16.5% from the 1970s, 39.7% from the 1980s, and 31.4% from the 1990s. Unfortunately, since the denominators (number of drug approvals) were not readily available, an accurate rate of withdrawal could not be reliably calculated. The most common categories of drugs withdrawn were: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (13.2%), nonnarcotic analgesics (8.3%), antidepressants (7.4%), and vasodilators (5.8%). The top five safety reasons for withdrawals were: hepatic (26.2%), hematologic (10.5%), cardiovascular (8.7%), dermatologic (6.3%), and carcinogenic (6.3%) issues. Among the 87 products for which the timing of marketing was available, the median time on the market was 5.4 years with about one-third withdrawn within the first two years. It is hoped that the current review will stimulate other future research into this important topic. However, due to the intrinsic limitations of the descriptive analysis design, our observations are subject to the availability of data in the public domain. Readers are cautioned to be objective and careful when approaching data of this nature in order not to misinterpret the results due to potential data gaps.
304 citations
••
National Institutes of Health1, Broad Institute2, University of Oxford3, State University of New York Upstate Medical University4, Scripps Research Institute5, NorthShore University HealthSystem6, University of California, San Diego7, Eli Lilly and Company8, Johns Hopkins University9, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill10, Pfizer11, Harvard University12, Helicos BioSciences13
TL;DR: GAIN has used new approaches for project selection, data deposition and distribution, collaborative analysis, publication and protection from premature intellectual property claims that demonstrate a new commitment to shared scientific knowledge that should facilitate rapid advances in understanding the genetics of complex diseases.
Abstract: The Genetic Association Information Network (GAIN) is a public-private partnership established to investigate the genetic basis of common diseases through a series of collaborative genome-wide association studies. GAIN has used new approaches for project selection, data deposition and distribution, collaborative analysis, publication and protection from premature intellectual property claims. These demonstrate a new commitment to shared scientific knowledge that should facilitate rapid advances in understanding the genetics of complex diseases.
303 citations
•
17 Sep 1976TL;DR: Derivatives of 2-phenyl-3-aroylbenzothiophenes and 1-oxides are useful as antifertility agents as mentioned in this paper. But their effectiveness is limited.
Abstract: Derivatives of 2-phenyl-3-aroylbenzothiophenes and 2-phenyl-3-aroylbenzothiophene-1-oxides are useful as antifertility agents. Certain of these compounds also are useful in suppressing the growth of mammary tumors.
303 citations
Authors
Showing all 17866 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Mark J. Daly | 204 | 763 | 304452 |
Irving L. Weissman | 201 | 1141 | 172504 |
Eric J. Topol | 193 | 1373 | 151025 |
Tony Hunter | 175 | 593 | 124726 |
Xiang Zhang | 154 | 1733 | 117576 |
Jerrold M. Olefsky | 143 | 595 | 77356 |
Stephen F. Badylak | 133 | 530 | 57083 |
George A. Bray | 131 | 896 | 100975 |
Lloyd Paul Aiello | 131 | 506 | 85550 |
Levi A. Garraway | 129 | 366 | 99989 |
Mark Sullivan | 126 | 802 | 63916 |
James A. Russell | 124 | 1024 | 87929 |
Tony L. Yaksh | 123 | 806 | 60898 |
Elisabetta Dejana | 122 | 430 | 48254 |
Hagop S. Akiskal | 118 | 565 | 50869 |