scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

EducationCambridge, Massachusetts, United States
About: Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a education organization based out in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Laser. The organization has 116795 authors who have published 268000 publications receiving 18272025 citations. The organization is also known as: MIT & M.I.T..


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A broad review of recent research work on the preparation and the remarkable properties of intercalation compounds of graphite can be found in this paper, covering a wide range of topics from the basic chemistry, physics and materials science to engineering applications.
Abstract: A broad review of recent research work on the preparation and the remarkable properties of intercalation compounds of graphite, covering a wide range of topics from the basic chemistry, physics and materials science to engineering applications.

1,956 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Three statistical models for natural language parsing are described, leading to approaches in which a parse tree is represented as the sequence of decisions corresponding to a head-centered, top-down derivation of the tree.
Abstract: This article describes three statistical models for natural language parsing. The models extend methods from probabilistic context-free grammars to lexicalized grammars, leading to approaches in which a parse tree is represented as the sequence of decisions corresponding to a head-centered, top-down derivation of the tree. Independence assumptions then lead to parameters that encode the X-bar schema, subcategorization, ordering of complements, placement of adjuncts, bigram lexical dependencies, wh-movement, and preferences for close attachment. All of these preferences are expressed by probabilities conditioned on lexical heads. The models are evaluated on the Penn Wall Street Journal Treebank, showing that their accuracy is competitive with other models in the literature. To gain a better understanding of the models, we also give results on different constituent types, as well as a breakdown of precision/recall results in recovering various types of dependencies. We analyze various characteristics of the models through experiments on parsing accuracy, by collecting frequencies of various structures in the treebank, and through linguistically motivated examples. Finally, we compare the models to others that have been applied to parsing the treebank, aiming to give some explanation of the difference in performance of the various models.

1,956 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2017
TL;DR: A new architecture for a fully optical neural network is demonstrated that enables a computational speed enhancement of at least two orders of magnitude and three order of magnitude in power efficiency over state-of-the-art electronics.
Abstract: Artificial Neural Networks have dramatically improved performance for many machine learning tasks. We demonstrate a new architecture for a fully optical neural network that enables a computational speed enhancement of at least two orders of magnitude and three orders of magnitude in power efficiency over state-of-the-art electronics.

1,955 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: A review and critique of the positive accounting literature following the publication of Watts and Zimmerman (1978, 1979) can be found in this paper, which suggests ways to improve positive research in accounting choice.
Abstract: This paper reviews and critiques the positive accounting literature following the publication of Watts and Zimmerman (1978, 1979), The 1978 paper helped generate the positive accounting literature that offers an explanation of accounting practice, suggests the importance of contracting costs, and has led to the discovery of some previously unknown empirical regularities. The 1979 paper produced a methodological debate that has not been very productive. This paper attempts to remove some common misconceptions about methodology that surfaced in that debate. It also suggests ways to improve positive research in accounting choice. The most important of these improvements is tighter links between the theory and the empirical tests. A second suggested improvement is the development of models that recognize the endogeneity among the variables in the regressions. A third improvement is reduction in measurement errors in both the dependent and independent variables in the regressions.

1,955 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Mar 2005-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, a comparative analysis of the human, mouse, rat and dog genomes is presented to create a systematic catalogue of common regulatory motifs in promoters and 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs).
Abstract: Comprehensive identification of all functional elements encoded in the human genome is a fundamental need in biomedical research. Here, we present a comparative analysis of the human, mouse, rat and dog genomes to create a systematic catalogue of common regulatory motifs in promoters and 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs). The promoter analysis yields 174 candidate motifs, including most previously known transcription-factor binding sites and 105 new motifs. The 3'-UTR analysis yields 106 motifs likely to be involved in post-transcriptional regulation. Nearly one-half are associated with microRNAs (miRNAs), leading to the discovery of many new miRNA genes and their likely target genes. Our results suggest that previous estimates of the number of human miRNA genes were low, and that miRNAs regulate at least 20% of human genes. The overall results provide a systematic view of gene regulation in the human, which will be refined as additional mammalian genomes become available.

1,954 citations


Authors

Showing all 117442 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Eric S. Lander301826525976
Robert Langer2812324326306
George M. Whitesides2401739269833
Trevor W. Robbins2311137164437
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Yi Cui2201015199725
Robert J. Lefkowitz214860147995
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Daniel Levy212933194778
Rudolf Jaenisch206606178436
Mark J. Daly204763304452
David Miller2032573204840
David Baltimore203876162955
Rakesh K. Jain2001467177727
Ronald M. Evans199708166722
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of California, Berkeley
265.6K papers, 16.8M citations

96% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

95% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

95% related

University of California, San Diego
204.5K papers, 12.3M citations

95% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023240
20221,124
202110,595
202011,922
201911,207
201810,883