Institution
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Healthcare•New York, New York, United States•
About: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is a healthcare organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 30293 authors who have published 65381 publications receiving 4462534 citations. The organization is also known as: MSKCC & New York Cancer Hospital.
Topics: Cancer, Population, Breast cancer, Radiation therapy, Prostate cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Initial therapy of metastatic breast cancer with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab prolongs progression-free survival, but not overall survival, as compared with pac litaxel alone.
Abstract: vs. 0.0%, P<0.001), proteinuria (3.6% vs. 0.0%, P<0.001), headache (2.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.008), and cerebrovascular ischemia (1.9% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.02) were more frequent in patients receiving paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. Infection was more common in patients receiving paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (9.3% vs. 2.9%, P<0.001), but febrile neutropenia was uncommon (<1% overall). Conclusions Initial therapy of metastatic breast cancer with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab prolongs progression-free survival, but not overall survival, as compared with paclitaxel alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00028990.)
2,984 citations
••
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center1, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center2, Harvard University3, Fox Chase Cancer Center4, University of Strasbourg5, Queen Mary University of London6, Aarhus University7, Rabin Medical Center8, Tel Aviv University9, University of British Columbia10, Roswell Park Cancer Institute11, Cancer Research UK12, University of Jena13, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul14, Niigata University15, Complutense University of Madrid16, Cleveland Clinic17, Bristol-Myers Squibb18, Johns Hopkins University19, Macquarie University20, Université Paris-Saclay21
TL;DR: Overall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate‐ and poor‐risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal‐cell carcinoma.
Abstract: Background Nivolumab plus ipilimumab produced objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma in a pilot study. This phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib for previously untreated clear-cell advanced renal-cell carcinoma. Methods We randomly assigned adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks, or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The coprimary end points were overall survival (alpha level, 0.04), objective response rate (alpha level, 0.001), and progression-free survival (alpha level, 0.009) among patients with intermediate or poor prognostic risk. Results A total of 1096 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (550 patients) or sunitinib (546 patients); 425 and 422, respectively, had intermediate or poor risk. At a median follo...
2,984 citations
••
TL;DR: In virtually all medical domains, diagnostic and prognostic multivariable prediction models are being developed, validated, updated, and implemented with the aim to assist doctors and individuals in estimating probabilities and potentially influence their decision making.
Abstract: The TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis) Statement includes a 22-item checklist, which aims to improve the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. This explanation and elaboration document describes the rationale; clarifies the meaning of each item; and discusses why transparent reporting is important, with a view to assessing risk of bias and clinical usefulness of the prediction model. Each checklist item of the TRIPOD Statement is explained in detail and accompanied by published examples of good reporting. The document also provides a valuable reference of issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing prediction model studies. To aid the editorial process and help peer reviewers and, ultimately, readers and systematic reviewers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission. The TRIPOD checklist can also be downloaded from www.tripod-statement.org.
2,982 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared a combination of irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with bolus doses of leucocil as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Abstract: Background The combination of fluorouracil and leucovorin has until recently been standard therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan prolongs survival in patients with colorectal cancer that is refractory to treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin. In a multicenter trial, we compared a combination of irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin with bolus doses of fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. A third group of patients received irinotecan alone. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive irinotecan (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously), fluorouracil (500 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus), and leucovorin (20 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) weekly for four weeks every six weeks; fluorouracil (425 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) and leucovorin (20 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) daily for five consecutive days every four weeks; or irinotecan alone (125 mg per square...
2,935 citations
••
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center1, Thomas Jefferson University2, Queen Mary University of London3, Netherlands Cancer Institute4, New York University5, University of Milan6, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital7, University of Chicago8, University of Paris-Sud9, Stanford University10, Technische Universität München11, Cleveland Clinic12, Mayo Clinic13, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai14, Yale University15, University of Navarra16, Sarah Cannon Research Institute17, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute18, Harvard University19, Genentech20, Foundation Medicine21, University of Virginia22
TL;DR: Treatment with atezolizumab resulted in a significantly improved RECIST v1.1 response rate, compared with a historical control overall response rate of 10%, and Exploratory analyses showed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subtypes and mutation load to be independently predictive for response to atezolediazepine.
2,934 citations
Authors
Showing all 30708 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Gordon H. Guyatt | 231 | 1620 | 228631 |
Edward Giovannucci | 206 | 1671 | 179875 |
Irving L. Weissman | 201 | 1141 | 172504 |
Craig B. Thompson | 195 | 557 | 173172 |
Joan Massagué | 189 | 408 | 149951 |
Gad Getz | 189 | 520 | 247560 |
Chris Sander | 178 | 713 | 233287 |
Richard B. Lipton | 176 | 2110 | 140776 |
Richard K. Wilson | 173 | 463 | 260000 |
George P. Chrousos | 169 | 1612 | 120752 |
Stephen J. Elledge | 162 | 406 | 112878 |
Murray F. Brennan | 161 | 925 | 97087 |
Lewis L. Lanier | 159 | 554 | 86677 |
David W. Bates | 159 | 1239 | 116698 |
Dan R. Littman | 157 | 426 | 107164 |