Institution
Radboud University Nijmegen
Education•Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands•
About: Radboud University Nijmegen is a education organization based out in Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 35417 authors who have published 83035 publications receiving 3285064 citations. The organization is also known as: Catholic University of Nijmegen & Radboud University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: Baseline CTC count is an important prognostic factor within specific subgroups defined by treatment or patient characteristics, and unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior PFS and overall survival.
489 citations
TL;DR: This paper presents a short overview of the changes to the trigger and data acquisition systems during the first long shutdown of the LHC and shows the performance of the trigger system and its components based on the 2015 proton–proton collision data.
Abstract: During 2015 the ATLAS experiment recorded 3.8 fb(-1) of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The ATLAS trigger system is a crucial component of the experiment, respons ...
488 citations
TL;DR: The combined use of immunohistochemistry with a retrograde fluorescent tracer, True Blue, indicated that the peptide-containing perikarya are found predominantly in the lateral part of ACe (ACe1), and that only a small proportion of neurotensin, somatostatin and corticotropin-releasing factor-stained neurons contained True Blue after injections into the PB or the DVC.
488 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that the conversion of spin-up into spin-down current near a ferromagnetic-nonferromagnetic metal interface gives rise to an electrochemical potential difference of spinup and spindown electrons.
Abstract: It is shown theoretically that the conversion of spin-up into spin-down current near a ferromagnetic-nonferromagnetic metal interface gives rise to an electrochemical potential difference of spin-up and spin-down electrons. The effect shows up as an additional boundary resistance. The situation is analogous to the normal-metal-superconductor interface. Experimental methods that may be used to observe the effects are discussed.
488 citations
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice1, Radboud University Nijmegen2, Johns Hopkins University3, Palo Alto Medical Foundation4, University of Wolverhampton5, Akershus University Hospital6, Maine Medical Center7, University of Hamburg8, Cardiff University9, Tokyo University of Technology10, University of Sydney11, Laval University12, Maastricht University Medical Centre13
TL;DR: The revised three-talk model of shared decision making depicts conversational steps, initiated by providing support when introducing options, followed by strategies to compare and discuss trade-offs, before deliberation based on informed preferences.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES
To revise an existing three-talk model for learning how
to achieve shared decision making, and to consult
with relevant stakeholders to update and obtain wider
engagement.
DESIGN
Multistage consultation process.
SETTING
Key informant group, communities of interest, and
survey of clinical specialties.
PARTICIPANTS
19 key informants, 153 member responses from
multiple communities of interest, and 316 responses
to an online survey from medically qualified clinicians
from six specialties.
RESULTS
After extended consultation over three iterations, we
revised the three-talk model by making changes to
one talk category, adding the need to elicit patient
goals, providing a clear set of tasks for each talk
category, and adding suggested scripts to illustrate
each step. A new three-talk model of shared decision
making is proposed, based on “team talk,” “option
talk,” and “decision talk,” to depict a process of
collaboration and deliberation. Team talk places
emphasis on the need to provide support to patients
when they are made aware of choices, and to elicit
their goals as a means of guiding decision making
processes. Option talk refers to the task of comparing
alternatives, using risk communication principles.
Decision talk refers to the task of arriving at decisions
that reflect the informed preferences of patients,
guided by the experience and expertise of health
professionals.
CONCLUSIONS
The revised three-talk model of shared decision
making depicts conversational steps, initiated by
providing support when introducing options, followed
by strategies to compare and discuss trade-offs,
before deliberation based on informed preferences.
487 citations
Authors
Showing all 35749 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles A. Dinarello | 190 | 1058 | 139668 |
| Richard H. Friend | 169 | 1182 | 140032 |
| Yang Gao | 168 | 2047 | 146301 |
| Ian J. Deary | 166 | 1795 | 114161 |
| David T. Felson | 153 | 861 | 133514 |
| Margaret A. Pericak-Vance | 149 | 826 | 118672 |
| Fernando Rivadeneira | 146 | 628 | 86582 |
| Shah Ebrahim | 146 | 733 | 96807 |
| Mihai G. Netea | 142 | 1170 | 86908 |
| Mingshui Chen | 141 | 1543 | 125369 |
| George Alverson | 140 | 1653 | 105074 |
| Barry Blumenfeld | 140 | 1909 | 105694 |
| Harvey B Newman | 139 | 1594 | 88308 |
| Tariq Aziz | 138 | 1646 | 96586 |
| Stylianos E. Antonarakis | 138 | 746 | 93605 |