scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Radboud University Nijmegen

EducationNijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
About: Radboud University Nijmegen is a education organization based out in Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 35417 authors who have published 83035 publications receiving 3285064 citations. The organization is also known as: Catholic University of Nijmegen & Radboud University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article developed a replication recipe to facilitate close and convincing replication attempts, outlining standard criteria for a convincing close replication, including faithfully recreating the original study while keeping track of differences, achieving high statistical power, checking the study's assumptions in new contexts, and pre-registering the study.
Abstract: Psychological scientists have recently started to reconsider the importance of close replications in building a cumulative knowledge base; however, there is not a consensus about what constitutes a convincing replication study. To facilitate close and convincing replication attempts we have developed a Replication Recipe, outlining standard criteria for a convincing close replication. This includes faithfully recreating the original study while keeping track of differences, achieving high statistical power, checking the study’s assumptions in new contexts, and pre-registering the study. We also discuss methods for evaluating and reporting replications. Identifying differences between replication and original (sample, culture, lab context, etc.) allows researchers to identify where their replication is on the continuum from “close” to “conceptual”. Our replication recipe can be used by established researchers, teachers, and students to conduct meaningful replication studies and integrate replications into their scholarly habits.

426 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A general guide to the cellular and humoral contributors to inflammation as well as to the pathways that characterize inflammation in specific organs and tissues is provided.
Abstract: Biologists, physicians and immunologists have contributed to the understanding of the cellular participants and biological pathways involved in inflammation. Here, we provide a general guide to the cellular and humoral contributors to inflammation as well as to the pathways that characterize inflammation in specific organs and tissues.

425 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anne D. Bjorkman1, Anne D. Bjorkman2, Isla H. Myers-Smith1, Sarah C. Elmendorf3, Sarah C. Elmendorf4, Sarah C. Elmendorf5, Signe Normand2, Nadja Rüger6, Pieter S. A. Beck, Anne Blach-Overgaard2, Daan Blok7, J. Hans C. Cornelissen8, Bruce C. Forbes9, Damien Georges1, Scott J. Goetz10, Kevin C. Guay11, Gregory H. R. Henry12, Janneke HilleRisLambers13, Robert D. Hollister14, Dirk Nikolaus Karger15, Jens Kattge16, Peter Manning, Janet S. Prevéy, Christian Rixen, Gabriela Schaepman-Strub17, Haydn J.D. Thomas1, Mark Vellend18, Martin Wilmking19, Sonja Wipf, Michele Carbognani20, Luise Hermanutz21, Esther Lévesque22, Ulf Molau23, Alessandro Petraglia20, Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia24, Marko J. Spasojevic25, Marcello Tomaselli20, Tage Vowles23, Juha M. Alatalo26, Heather D. Alexander27, Alba Anadon-Rosell19, Alba Anadon-Rosell28, Sandra Angers-Blondin1, Mariska te Beest29, Mariska te Beest30, Logan T. Berner10, Robert G. Björk23, Agata Buchwal31, Agata Buchwal32, Allan Buras33, Katherine S. Christie34, Elisabeth J. Cooper35, Stefan Dullinger36, Bo Elberling37, Anu Eskelinen38, Anu Eskelinen39, Esther R. Frei15, Esther R. Frei12, Oriol Grau40, Paul Grogan41, Martin Hallinger, Karen A. Harper42, Monique M. P. D. Heijmans33, James I. Hudson, Karl Hülber36, Maitane Iturrate-Garcia17, Colleen M. Iversen43, Francesca Jaroszynska44, Jill F. Johnstone45, Rasmus Halfdan Jørgensen37, Elina Kaarlejärvi29, Elina Kaarlejärvi46, Rebecca A Klady12, Sara Kuleza45, Aino Kulonen, Laurent J. Lamarque22, Trevor C. Lantz47, Chelsea J. Little48, Chelsea J. Little17, James D. M. Speed49, Anders Michelsen37, Ann Milbau50, Jacob Nabe-Nielsen2, Sigrid Schøler Nielsen2, Josep M. Ninot28, Steven F. Oberbauer51, Johan Olofsson29, Vladimir G. Onipchenko52, Sabine B. Rumpf36, Philipp R. Semenchuk36, Philipp R. Semenchuk35, Rohan Shetti19, Laura Siegwart Collier21, Lorna E. Street1, Katharine N. Suding5, Ken D. Tape53, Andrew J. Trant21, Andrew J. Trant54, Urs A. Treier2, Jean-Pierre Tremblay55, Maxime Tremblay22, Susanna Venn56, Stef Weijers57, Tara Zamin41, Noémie Boulanger-Lapointe12, William A. Gould58, David S. Hik59, Annika Hofgaard, Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir60, Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir61, Janet C. Jorgenson62, Julia A. Klein63, Borgthor Magnusson, Craig E. Tweedie64, Philip A. Wookey65, Michael Bahn66, Benjamin Blonder67, Benjamin Blonder68, Peter M. van Bodegom24, Benjamin Bond-Lamberty69, Giandiego Campetella70, Bruno Enrico Leone Cerabolini71, F. Stuart Chapin53, William K. Cornwell72, Joseph M. Craine, Matteo Dainese, Franciska T. de Vries73, Sandra Díaz74, Brian J. Enquist75, Brian J. Enquist76, Walton A. Green77, Rubén Milla78, Ülo Niinemets79, Yusuke Onoda80, Jenny C. Ordoñez81, Wim A. Ozinga33, Wim A. Ozinga82, Josep Peñuelas40, Hendrik Poorter83, Hendrik Poorter84, Peter Poschlod85, Peter B. Reich86, Peter B. Reich87, Brody Sandel88, Brandon S. Schamp89, Serge N. Sheremetev90, Evan Weiher91 
University of Edinburgh1, Aarhus University2, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research3, National Ecological Observatory Network4, University of Colorado Boulder5, Smithsonian Institution6, Lund University7, VU University Amsterdam8, University of Lapland9, Northern Arizona University10, Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences11, University of British Columbia12, University of Washington13, Grand Valley State University14, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research15, Max Planck Society16, University of Zurich17, Université de Sherbrooke18, University of Greifswald19, University of Parma20, Memorial University of Newfoundland21, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières22, University of Gothenburg23, Leiden University24, University of California, Riverside25, Qatar University26, Mississippi State University27, University of Barcelona28, Umeå University29, Utrecht University30, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań31, University of Alaska Anchorage32, Wageningen University and Research Centre33, Alaska Department of Fish and Game34, University of Tromsø35, University of Vienna36, University of Copenhagen37, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ38, University of Oulu39, Spanish National Research Council40, Queen's University41, Saint Mary's University42, Oak Ridge National Laboratory43, University of Aberdeen44, University of Saskatchewan45, Vrije Universiteit Brussel46, University of Victoria47, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology48, Norwegian University of Science and Technology49, Research Institute for Nature and Forest50, Florida International University51, Moscow State University52, University of Alaska Fairbanks53, University of Waterloo54, Laval University55, Deakin University56, University of Bonn57, United States Forest Service58, Simon Fraser University59, University Centre in Svalbard60, University of Iceland61, United States Fish and Wildlife Service62, Colorado State University63, University of Texas at El Paso64, University of Stirling65, University of Innsbruck66, University of Oxford67, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory68, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory69, University of Camerino70, University of Insubria71, University of New South Wales72, University of Manchester73, National University of Cordoba74, University of Arizona75, Santa Fe Institute76, Harvard University77, King Juan Carlos University78, Estonian University of Life Sciences79, Kyoto University80, World Agroforestry Centre81, Radboud University Nijmegen82, Macquarie University83, Forschungszentrum Jülich84, University of Regensburg85, University of Sydney86, University of Minnesota87, Santa Clara University88, Algoma University89, Komarov Botanical Institute90, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire91
04 Oct 2018-Nature
TL;DR: Biome-wide relationships between temperature, moisture and seven key plant functional traits across the tundra and over time show that community height increased with warming across all sites, whereas other traits lagged behind predicted rates of change.
Abstract: The tundra is warming more rapidly than any other biome on Earth, and the potential ramifications are far-reaching because of global feedback effects between vegetation and climate. A better understanding of how environmental factors shape plant structure and function is crucial for predicting the consequences of environmental change for ecosystem functioning. Here we explore the biome-wide relationships between temperature, moisture and seven key plant functional traits both across space and over three decades of warming at 117 tundra locations. Spatial temperature-trait relationships were generally strong but soil moisture had a marked influence on the strength and direction of these relationships, highlighting the potentially important influence of changes in water availability on future trait shifts in tundra plant communities. Community height increased with warming across all sites over the past three decades, but other traits lagged far behind predicted rates of change. Our findings highlight the challenge of using space-for-time substitution to predict the functional consequences of future warming and suggest that functions that are tied closely to plant height will experience the most rapid change. They also reveal the strength with which environmental factors shape biotic communities at the coldest extremes of the planet and will help to improve projections of functional changes in tundra ecosystems with climate warming.

425 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
A. Abada1, Marcello Abbrescia2, Marcello Abbrescia3, Shehu S. AbdusSalam4  +1496 moreInstitutions (238)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the detailed design and preparation of a construction project for a post-LHC circular energy frontier collider in collaboration with national institutes, laboratories and universities worldwide, and enhanced by a strong participation of industrial partners.
Abstract: Particle physics has arrived at an important moment of its history. The discovery of the Higgs boson, with a mass of 125 GeV, completes the matrix of particles and interactions that has constituted the “Standard Model” for several decades. This model is a consistent and predictive theory, which has so far proven successful at describing all phenomena accessible to collider experiments. However, several experimental facts do require the extension of the Standard Model and explanations are needed for observations such as the abundance of matter over antimatter, the striking evidence for dark matter and the non-zero neutrino masses. Theoretical issues such as the hierarchy problem, and, more in general, the dynamical origin of the Higgs mechanism, do likewise point to the existence of physics beyond the Standard Model. This report contains the description of a novel research infrastructure based on a highest-energy hadron collider with a centre-of-mass collision energy of 100 TeV and an integrated luminosity of at least a factor of 5 larger than the HL-LHC. It will extend the current energy frontier by almost an order of magnitude. The mass reach for direct discovery will reach several tens of TeV, and allow, for example, to produce new particles whose existence could be indirectly exposed by precision measurements during the earlier preceding e+e– collider phase. This collider will also precisely measure the Higgs self-coupling and thoroughly explore the dynamics of electroweak symmetry breaking at the TeV scale, to elucidate the nature of the electroweak phase transition. WIMPs as thermal dark matter candidates will be discovered, or ruled out. As a single project, this particle collider infrastructure will serve the world-wide physics community for about 25 years and, in combination with a lepton collider (see FCC conceptual design report volume 2), will provide a research tool until the end of the 21st century. Collision energies beyond 100 TeV can be considered when using high-temperature superconductors. The European Strategy for Particle Physics (ESPP) update 2013 stated “To stay at the forefront of particle physics, Europe needs to be in a position to propose an ambitious post-LHC accelerator project at CERN by the time of the next Strategy update”. The FCC study has implemented the ESPP recommendation by developing a long-term vision for an “accelerator project in a global context”. This document describes the detailed design and preparation of a construction project for a post-LHC circular energy frontier collider “in collaboration with national institutes, laboratories and universities worldwide”, and enhanced by a strong participation of industrial partners. Now, a coordinated preparation effort can be based on a core of an ever-growing consortium of already more than 135 institutes worldwide. The technology for constructing a high-energy circular hadron collider can be brought to the technology readiness level required for constructing within the coming ten years through a focused R&D programme. The FCC-hh concept comprises in the baseline scenario a power-saving, low-temperature superconducting magnet system based on an evolution of the Nb3Sn technology pioneered at the HL-LHC, an energy-efficient cryogenic refrigeration infrastructure based on a neon-helium (Nelium) light gas mixture, a high-reliability and low loss cryogen distribution infrastructure based on Invar, high-power distributed beam transfer using superconducting elements and local magnet energy recovery and re-use technologies that are already gradually introduced at other CERN accelerators. On a longer timescale, high-temperature superconductors can be developed together with industrial partners to achieve an even more energy efficient particle collider or to reach even higher collision energies.The re-use of the LHC and its injector chain, which also serve for a concurrently running physics programme, is an essential lever to come to an overall sustainable research infrastructure at the energy frontier. Strategic R&D for FCC-hh aims at minimising construction cost and energy consumption, while maximising the socio-economic impact. It will mitigate technology-related risks and ensure that industry can benefit from an acceptable utility. Concerning the implementation, a preparatory phase of about eight years is both necessary and adequate to establish the project governance and organisation structures, to build the international machine and experiment consortia, to develop a territorial implantation plan in agreement with the host-states’ requirements, to optimise the disposal of land and underground volumes, and to prepare the civil engineering project. Such a large-scale, international fundamental research infrastructure, tightly involving industrial partners and providing training at all education levels, will be a strong motor of economic and societal development in all participating nations. The FCC study has implemented a set of actions towards a coherent vision for the world-wide high-energy and particle physics community, providing a collaborative framework for topically complementary and geographically well-balanced contributions. This conceptual design report lays the foundation for a subsequent infrastructure preparatory and technical design phase.

425 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
V. M. Abazov1, Brad Abbott2, M. Abolins3, Bobby Samir Acharya4  +814 moreInstitutions (74)
TL;DR: The D0 experiment enjoyed a very successful data-collection run at the Fermilab Tevatron collider between 1992 and 1996 as discussed by the authors, and the detector has been upgraded to take advantage of improvements to the Tevoton and to enhance its physics capabilities.
Abstract: The D0 experiment enjoyed a very successful data-collection run at the Fermilab Tevatron collider between 1992 and 1996. Since then, the detector has been upgraded to take advantage of improvements to the Tevatron and to enhance its physics capabilities. We describe the new elements of the detector, including the silicon microstrip tracker, central fiber tracker, solenoidal magnet, preshower detectors, forward muon detector, and forward proton detector. The uranium/liquid-argon calorimeters and central muon detector, remaining from Run I, are discussed briefly. We also present the associated electronics, triggering, and data acquisition systems, along with the design and implementation of software specific to D0.

425 citations


Authors

Showing all 35749 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Charles A. Dinarello1901058139668
Richard H. Friend1691182140032
Yang Gao1682047146301
Ian J. Deary1661795114161
David T. Felson153861133514
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance149826118672
Fernando Rivadeneira14662886582
Shah Ebrahim14673396807
Mihai G. Netea142117086908
Mingshui Chen1411543125369
George Alverson1401653105074
Barry Blumenfeld1401909105694
Harvey B Newman139159488308
Tariq Aziz138164696586
Stylianos E. Antonarakis13874693605
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

95% related

University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

95% related

University of Toronto
294.9K papers, 13.5M citations

94% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

94% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023123
2022492
20216,380
20206,080
20195,747
20185,114