scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Radboud University Nijmegen

EducationNijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
About: Radboud University Nijmegen is a education organization based out in Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 35417 authors who have published 83035 publications receiving 3285064 citations. The organization is also known as: Catholic University of Nijmegen & Radboud University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
20 Mar 2020-Science
TL;DR: Results support the radial unit hypothesis that different developmental mechanisms promote surface area expansion and increases in thickness and find evidence that brain structure is a key phenotype along the causal pathway that leads from genetic variation to differences in general cognitive function.
Abstract: The cerebral cortex underlies our complex cognitive capabilities, yet little is known about the specific genetic loci that influence human cortical structure. To identify genetic variants that affect cortical structure, we conducted a genome-wide association meta-analysis of brain magnetic resonance imaging data from 51,665 individuals. We analyzed the surface area and average thickness of the whole cortex and 34 regions with known functional specializations. We identified 199 significant loci and found significant enrichment for loci influencing total surface area within regulatory elements that are active during prenatal cortical development, supporting the radial unit hypothesis. Loci that affect regional surface area cluster near genes in Wnt signaling pathways, which influence progenitor expansion and areal identity. Variation in cortical structure is genetically correlated with cognitive function, Parkinson's disease, insomnia, depression, neuroticism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

436 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups are detailed.
Abstract: EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intra patient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the con figuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.

436 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Georges Aad1, Brad Abbott2, J. Abdallah3, S. Abdel Khalek4  +3073 moreInstitutions (193)
TL;DR: In this paper, a Fourier analysis of the charged particle pair distribution in relative azimuthal angle (Delta phi = phi(a)-phi(b)) is performed to extract the coefficients v(n,n) =.
Abstract: Differential measurements of charged particle azimuthal anisotropy are presented for lead-lead collisions at root sNN = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, based on an integrated luminosity of approximately 8 mu b(-1). This anisotropy is characterized via a Fourier expansion of the distribution of charged particles in azimuthal angle relative to the reaction plane, with the coefficients v(n) denoting the magnitude of the anisotropy. Significant v(2)-v(6) values are obtained as a function of transverse momentum (0.5 = 3 are found to vary weakly with both eta and centrality, and their p(T) dependencies are found to follow an approximate scaling relation, v(n)(1/n)(p(T)) proportional to v(2)(1/2)(p(T)), except in the top 5% most central collisions. A Fourier analysis of the charged particle pair distribution in relative azimuthal angle (Delta phi = phi(a)-phi(b)) is performed to extract the coefficients v(n,n) = . For pairs of charged particles with a large pseudorapidity gap (|Delta eta = eta(a) - eta(b)| > 2) and one particle with p(T) < 3 GeV, the v(2,2)-v(6,6) values are found to factorize as v(n,n)(p(T)(a), p(T)(b)) approximate to v(n) (p(T)(a))v(n)(p(T)(b)) in central and midcentral events. Such factorization suggests that these values of v(2,2)-v(6,6) are primarily attributable to the response of the created matter to the fluctuations in the geometry of the initial state. A detailed study shows that the v(1,1)(p(T)(a), p(T)(b)) data are consistent with the combined contributions from a rapidity-even v(1) and global momentum conservation. A two-component fit is used to extract the v(1) contribution. The extracted v(1) isobserved to cross zero at pT approximate to 1.0 GeV, reaches a maximum at 4-5 GeV with a value comparable to that for v(3), and decreases at higher p(T).

435 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anthony M. Reilly1, Richard I. Cooper2, Claire S. Adjiman3, Saswata Bhattacharya4, A. Daniel Boese5, Jan Gerit Brandenburg6, Peter J. Bygrave7, Rita Bylsma8, J.E. Campbell7, Roberto Car9, David H. Case7, Renu Chadha10, Jason C. Cole1, Katherine Cosburn11, Katherine Cosburn12, Herma M. Cuppen8, Farren Curtis13, Farren Curtis11, Graeme M. Day7, Robert A. DiStasio14, Robert A. DiStasio9, Alexander Dzyabchenko, Bouke P. van Eijck15, Dennis M. Elking16, Joost A. van den Ende8, Julio C. Facelli17, Marta B. Ferraro18, Laszlo Fusti-Molnar16, Christina-Anna Gatsiou3, Thomas S. Gee7, René de Gelder8, Luca M. Ghiringhelli4, Hitoshi Goto19, Stefan Grimme6, Rui Guo20, D. W. M. Hofmann21, Johannes Hoja4, Rebecca K. Hylton20, Luca Iuzzolino20, Wojciech Jankiewicz22, Daniël T. de Jong8, John Kendrick1, Niek J. J. de Klerk8, Hsin-Yu Ko9, L. N. Kuleshova, Xiayue Li11, Xiayue Li23, Sanjaya Lohani11, Frank J. J. Leusen1, Albert M. Lund17, Albert M. Lund16, Jian Lv4, Yanming Ma4, Noa Marom13, Noa Marom11, Artëm E. Masunov, Patrick McCabe1, David P. McMahon7, Hugo Meekes8, Michael P. Metz10, Alston J. Misquitta11, Sharmarke Mohamed12, Bartomeu Monserrat24, Richard J. Needs13, Marcus A. Neumann, Jonas Nyman7, Shigeaki Obata19, Harald Oberhofer15, Artem R. Oganov, Anita M. Orendt17, Gabriel Ignacio Pagola18, Constantinos C. Pantelides3, Chris J. Pickard20, Chris J. Pickard1, Rafał Podeszwa22, Louise S. Price20, Sarah L. Price20, Angeles Pulido7, Murray G. Read1, Karsten Reuter15, Elia Schneider20, Christoph Schober15, Gregory P. Shields1, Pawanpreet Singh10, Isaac J. Sugden3, Krzysztof Szalewicz10, Christopher R. Taylor7, Alexandre Tkatchenko25, Alexandre Tkatchenko26, Mark E. Tuckerman27, Mark E. Tuckerman28, Mark E. Tuckerman29, Francesca Vacarro11, Francesca Vacarro30, Manolis Vasileiadis3, Álvaro Vázquez-Mayagoitia2, Leslie Vogt20, Yanchao Wang4, Rona E. Watson20, Gilles A. de Wijs8, Jack Yang7, Qiang Zhu16, Colin R. Groom1 
TL;DR: The results of the sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction methods are presented and discussed, highlighting progress for salts, hydrates and bulky flexible molecules, as well as on-going challenges.
Abstract: The sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) methods has been held, with five target systems: a small nearly rigid molecule, a polymorphic former drug candidate, a chloride salt hydrate, a co-crystal and a bulky flexible molecule. This blind test has seen substantial growth in the number of participants, with the broad range of prediction methods giving a unique insight into the state of the art in the field. Significant progress has been seen in treating flexible molecules, usage of hierarchical approaches to ranking structures, the application of density-functional approximations, and the establishment of new workflows and `best practices' for performing CSP calculations. All of the targets, apart from a single potentially disordered Z' = 2 polymorph of the drug candidate, were predicted by at least one submission. Despite many remaining challenges, it is clear that CSP methods are becoming more applicable to a wider range of real systems, including salts, hydrates and larger flexible molecules. The results also highlight the potential for CSP calculations to complement and augment experimental studies of organic solid forms.

435 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work proposes a hypothesis that integrates growth inhibition and growth stimulation into one biphasic ethylene response model, and highlights several mechanisms through which ethylene affects plant growth, thereby interacting with various other signal transduction routes.

435 citations


Authors

Showing all 35749 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Charles A. Dinarello1901058139668
Richard H. Friend1691182140032
Yang Gao1682047146301
Ian J. Deary1661795114161
David T. Felson153861133514
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance149826118672
Fernando Rivadeneira14662886582
Shah Ebrahim14673396807
Mihai G. Netea142117086908
Mingshui Chen1411543125369
George Alverson1401653105074
Barry Blumenfeld1401909105694
Harvey B Newman139159488308
Tariq Aziz138164696586
Stylianos E. Antonarakis13874693605
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

95% related

University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

95% related

University of Toronto
294.9K papers, 13.5M citations

94% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

94% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023123
2022492
20216,380
20206,080
20195,747
20185,114