Institution
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Facility•Newport News, Virginia, United States•
About: Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is a facility organization based out in Newport News, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Nucleon & Quantum chromodynamics. The organization has 2162 authors who have published 3969 publications receiving 121243 citations. The organization is also known as: Jefferson Lab & JLAB.
Topics: Nucleon, Quantum chromodynamics, Quark, Lattice QCD, Parton
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Genoa1, University of Manchester2, KEK3, CERN4, Imperial College London5, Stanford University6, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research7, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare8, University of Pittsburgh9, Lyon College10, TRIUMF11, Northeastern University12, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility13, University of Córdoba (Spain)14, Goethe University Frankfurt15, University of Southampton16, University of Udine17, University of Alberta18, Tokyo Metropolitan University19, Helsinki Institute of Physics20, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI21, University of Bath22, Niigata University23, Naruto University of Education24, Kobe University25, University of Calabria26, University of Trieste27, European Space Agency28, University of Birmingham29, Ritsumeikan University30, Qinetiq31, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne32, Massachusetts Institute of Technology33, Brookhaven National Laboratory34
01 Jul 2003-Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment
TL;DR: The Gelfant 4 toolkit as discussed by the authors is a toolkit for simulating the passage of particles through matter, including a complete range of functionality including tracking, geometry, physics models and hits.
Abstract: G eant 4 is a toolkit for simulating the passage of particles through matter. It includes a complete range of functionality including tracking, geometry, physics models and hits. The physics processes offered cover a comprehensive range, including electromagnetic, hadronic and optical processes, a large set of long-lived particles, materials and elements, over a wide energy range starting, in some cases, from 250 eV and extending in others to the TeV energy range. It has been designed and constructed to expose the physics models utilised, to handle complex geometries, and to enable its easy adaptation for optimal use in different sets of applications. The toolkit is the result of a worldwide collaboration of physicists and software engineers. It has been created exploiting software engineering and object-oriented technology and implemented in the C++ programming language. It has been used in applications in particle physics, nuclear physics, accelerator design, space engineering and medical physics.
18,904 citations
••
TL;DR: The review as discussed by the authors summarizes much of particle physics and cosmology using data from previous editions, plus 3,283 new measurements from 899 Japers, including the recently discovered Higgs boson, leptons, quarks, mesons and baryons.
Abstract: The Review summarizes much of particle physics and cosmology. Using data from previous editions, plus 3,283 new measurements from 899 Japers, we list, evaluate, and average measured properties of gauge bosons and the recently discovered Higgs boson, leptons, quarks, mesons, and baryons. We summarize searches for hypothetical particles such as heavy neutrinos, supersymmetric and technicolor particles, axions, dark photons, etc. All the particle properties and search limits are listed in Summary Tables. We also give numerous tables, figures, formulae, and reviews of topics such as Supersymmetry, Extra Dimensions, Particle Detectors, Probability, and Statistics. Among the 112 reviews are many that are new or heavily revised including those on: Dark Energy, Higgs Boson Physics, Electroweak Model, Neutrino Cross Section Measurements, Monte Carlo Neutrino Generators, Top Quark, Dark Matter, Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, Accelerator Physics of Colliders, High-Energy Collider Parameters, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, Astrophysical Constants and Cosmological Parameters.
7,337 citations
••
Technische Universität München1, Novosibirsk State University2, Cornell University3, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory4, University of California, Davis5, Argonne National Laboratory6, Fermilab7, Florida State University8, Indiana University9, Brookhaven National Laboratory10, Wayne State University11, University of Paris-Sud12, GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research13, Ohio State University14, University of Regensburg15, University of Ferrara16, Polish Academy of Sciences17, University of Bari18, Max Planck Society19, Lancaster University20, Peking University21, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility22, University of Auvergne23, University of Cincinnati24, Stanford University25, University of Alberta26, Forschungszentrum Jülich27, University of Hawaii28, Illinois Institute of Technology29, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory30, École Polytechnique31, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics32, CERN33, Université catholique de Louvain34, Pratt Institute35, University of São Paulo36, Seoul National University37, Tsinghua University38, Stony Brook University39, University of Valencia40, University of Milan41, Tohoku University42, University of Minnesota43
TL;DR: The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and provided specific recommendations for further progress as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: A golden age for heavy-quarkonium physics dawned a decade ago, initiated by the confluence of exciting advances in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and an explosion of related experimental activity. The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and provided specific recommendations for further progress. However, the broad spectrum of subsequent breakthroughs, surprises, and continuing puzzles could only be partially anticipated. Since the release of the YR, the BESII program concluded only to give birth to BESIII; the B-factories and CLEO-c flourished; quarkonium production and polarization measurements at HERA and the Tevatron matured; and heavy-ion collisions at RHIC have opened a window on the deconfinement regime. All these experiments leave legacies of quality, precision, and unsolved mysteries for quarkonium physics, and therefore beg for continuing investigations at BESIII, the LHC, RHIC, FAIR, the Super Flavor and/or Tau-Charm factories, JLab, the ILC, and beyond. The list of newly found conventional states expanded to include h(c)(1P), chi(c2)(2P), B-c(+), and eta(b)(1S). In addition, the unexpected and still-fascinating X(3872) has been joined by more than a dozen other charmonium- and bottomonium-like "XYZ" states that appear to lie outside the quark model. Many of these still need experimental confirmation. The plethora of new states unleashed a flood of theoretical investigations into new forms of matter such as quark-gluon hybrids, mesonic molecules, and tetraquarks. Measurements of the spectroscopy, decays, production, and in-medium behavior of c (c) over bar, b (b) over bar, and b (c) over bar bound states have been shown to validate some theoretical approaches to QCD and highlight lack of quantitative success for others. Lattice QCD has grown from a tool with computational possibilities to an industrial-strength effort now dependent more on insight and innovation than pure computational power. New effective field theories for the description of quarkonium in different regimes have been developed and brought to a high degree of sophistication, thus enabling precise and solid theoretical predictions. Many expected decays and transitions have either been measured with precision or for the first time, but the confusing patterns of decays, both above and below open-flavor thresholds, endure and have deepened. The intriguing details of quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions that have emerged from RHIC have elevated the importance of separating hot- and cold-nuclear-matter effects in quark-gluon plasma studies. This review systematically addresses all these matters and concludes by prioritizing directions for ongoing and future efforts.
1,354 citations
••
Hampton University1, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility2, University of Paris-Sud3, University of Santiago, Chile4, Brookhaven National Laboratory5, University of Pavia6, University of Groningen7, Federico Santa María Technical University8, Shandong University9, Goethe University Frankfurt10, Stony Brook University11, Baruch College12, Duke University13, Argonne National Laboratory14, The Catholic University of America15, Old Dominion University16, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory17, Ohio State University18, University of Zagreb19, University of Jyväskylä20, Tel Aviv University21, CERN22, Temple University23, Massachusetts Institute of Technology24, Columbia University25, Ruhr University Bochum26, California Institute of Technology27, University of Massachusetts Amherst28, University of Buenos Aires29, University of the Basque Country30, University of Connecticut31, University of Tübingen32, Pennsylvania State University33, Stanford University34, Dalhousie University35, Central China Normal University36
TL;DR: In this article, the science case of an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), focused on the structure and interactions of gluon-dominated matter, with the intent to articulate it to the broader nuclear science community, is presented.
Abstract: This White Paper presents the science case of an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), focused on the structure and interactions of gluon-dominated matter, with the intent to articulate it to the broader nuclear science community. It was commissioned by the managements of Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) with the objective of presenting a summary of scientific opportunities and goals of the EIC as a follow-up to the 2007 NSAC Long Range plan. This document is a culmination of a community-wide effort in nuclear science following a series of workshops on EIC physics over the past decades and, in particular, the focused ten-week program on “Gluons and quark sea at high energies” at the Institute for Nuclear Theory in Fall 2010. It contains a brief description of a few golden physics measurements along with accelerator and detector concepts required to achieve them. It has been benefited profoundly from inputs by the users’ communities of BNL and JLab. This White Paper offers the promise to propel the QCD science program in the US, established with the CEBAF accelerator at JLab and the RHIC collider at BNL, to the next QCD frontier.
1,022 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the capabilities for vacuum electronic device (VED) sources of powerful terahertz (THz) and near-THz coherent radiation, both CW or average and pulsed, were evaluated.
Abstract: Recent research and development has been incredibly successful at advancing the capabilities for vacuum electronic device (VED) sources of powerful terahertz (THz) and near-THz coherent radiation, both CW or average and pulsed. Currently, the VED source portfolio covers over 12 orders of magnitude in power (mW-to-GW) and two orders of magnitude in frequency (from ; 10 THz). Further advances are still possible and anticipated. They will be enabled by improved understanding of fundamental beam-wave interactions, electromagnetic mode competition and mode control, along with research and development of new materials, fabrication methods, cathodes, electron beam alignment and focusing, magnet technologies, THz metrology and advanced, broadband output radiation coupling techniques.
860 citations
Authors
Showing all 2187 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Jie Zhang | 178 | 4857 | 221720 |
Pete Markowitz | 131 | 1047 | 81521 |
R. Yoshida | 123 | 689 | 68813 |
Robert Edwards | 121 | 775 | 74552 |
Tiehui Liu | 106 | 1169 | 51941 |
John C. Mitchell | 104 | 676 | 36467 |
Wei Liu | 102 | 2927 | 65228 |
Stanley J. Brodsky | 96 | 837 | 36818 |
David R. Nelson | 94 | 417 | 35479 |
Raphael Noel Tieulent | 89 | 417 | 24926 |
Davide Gaiotto | 86 | 220 | 25108 |
V. Papavassiliou | 81 | 359 | 26590 |
S. F. Pate | 80 | 388 | 26360 |
Ross D. Young | 76 | 408 | 17627 |
Richard Wilson | 70 | 809 | 21477 |