scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

An Overview of Tuning Rules for the PI and PID Continuous-Time Control of Time-Delayed Single-Input, Single-Output (SISO) Processes

TLDR
This chapter will provide an outline of tuning rules for continuous-time PI and PID control of time-delayed single-input, single-output (SISO) processes.
Abstract
The ability of PI and PID controllers to compensate many practical processes has led to their wide acceptance in industrial applications The requirement to choose two or three controller parameters is most easily done using tuning rules Starting with a general discussion of industrial practice, the chapter will provide an outline of tuning rules for continuous-time PI and PID control of time-delayed single-input, single-output (SISO) processes

read more

Citations
More filters

Robust and optimal tuning of PI and PID Controllers

TL;DR: In this paper, a general controller evaluation method based on three performance and robustness criteria is presented, which can be used to compare controllers of different structures, but also as a design method to find the optimal parameter setting for a controller of given structure.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neural Network Control System of UAV Altitude Dynamics and Its Comparison with the PID Control System

TL;DR: A comparative method to assess the performance of artificial neural network’s direct inverse control (DIC-ANN) with the PID control system found better achievement in the altitude dynamics was attained by the Dic-ANN compared to PID control method.
Journal ArticleDOI

PID Controller Tuning via Dominant Pole Placement in Comparison with Ziegler-Nichols Tuning

TL;DR: The dominant three-pole placement approach to the PID tuning is designed for oscillatory, aperiodic and integrating plants of the third-order and is demonstrated overcoming well-known Ziegler-Nichols (Z-N) tuning rule.
Journal ArticleDOI

PID Control With Higher Order Derivative Degrees for IPDT Plant Models

TL;DR: The main new finding is that HO-PID control enables faster transients by simultaneously reducing the negative effects of measurement noise and increasing the closed-loop robustness.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Set-point weighted PID controller tuning for time-delayed unstable processes

TL;DR: The set-point weighted proportional, integral, and derivative (PID) controller has been shown to be equivalent to an error feedback PID controller with a PD controller in the inner loop; and, many nonerror feedback designs have been unified under the frame of tuning the set- point weighted PID controller.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Using standard forms for controller design

TL;DR: The paper revisits the problem of the use of standard forms of closed loop transfer functions in control system design and new performance criteria for the standard forms are introduced and the results extended to include a system zero.
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of two design methods for PID controllers

TL;DR: In this article, a comparison study of these two approaches for designing a PI and a PID controller is made, and the differences and the similarities of the two approaches are also given.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the model matching approach to PID design: Analytical perspective for robust Servo/Regulator tradeoff tuning

TL;DR: In this paper, the robust tuning of a 1DOF PID controller for both acceptable load disturbance attenuation (regulator mode) and setpoint tracking (servo mode) of step signals based on a First Order Plus Time Delay (FOPTD) model is addressed.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

PID Controller Tuning Rules for Varying Time-Delay Systems

TL;DR: Novel tuning rules that are robust to varying time-delays are derived using the concept of jitter margin combined with the AMIGO tuning rule methodology and it is demonstrated that these new tuning rules achieve significant improvements inJitter margin at the expense of only slight decreases in other performance criteria.
Related Papers (5)