Assessing strengths and weaknesses of DNA metabarcoding‐based macroinvertebrate identification for routine stream monitoring
TLDR
Using samples obtained in the field, it is demonstrated that DNA metabarcoding can achieve comparable assessment results to current protocols relying on morphological identification, and offers powerful advantage over Morphological identification in providing identification for taxonomic groups that are unfeasible to identify in routine protocols.Abstract:
Summary
DNA metabarcoding holds great promise for the assessment of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems. However, few large-scale studies have compared the performance of DNA metabarcoding with that of routine morphological identification.
We performed metabarcoding using four primer sets on macroinvertebrate samples from 18 stream sites across Finland. The samples were collected in 2013 and identified based on morphology as part of a Finnish stream monitoring program. Specimens were morphologically classified, following standardised protocols, to the lowest taxonomic level for which identification was feasible in the routine national monitoring.
DNA metabarcoding identified more than twice the number of taxa than the morphology-based protocol, and also yielded a higher taxonomic resolution. For each sample, we detected more taxa by metabarcoding than by the morphological method, and all four primer sets exhibited comparably good performance. Sequence read abundance and the number of specimens per taxon (a proxy for biomass) were significantly correlated in each sample, although the adjusted R2 values were low. With a few exceptions, the ecological status assessment metrics calculated from morphological and DNA metabarcoding datasets were similar. Given the recent reduction in sequencing costs, metabarcoding is currently approximately as expensive as morphology-based identification.
Using samples obtained in the field, we demonstrated that DNA metabarcoding can achieve comparable assessment results to current protocols relying on morphological identification. Thus, metabarcoding represents a feasible and reliable method to identify macroinvertebrates in stream bioassessment, and offers powerful advantage over morphological identification in providing identification for taxonomic groups that are unfeasible to identify in routine protocols. To unlock the full potential of DNA metabarcoding for ecosystem assessment, however, it will be necessary to address key problems with current laboratory protocols and reference databases.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems
Jan Pawlowski,Mary Kelly-Quinn,Florian Altermatt,Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil,Pedro Beja,Angela Boggero,Ángel Borja,Agnès Bouchez,Tristan Cordier,Isabelle Domaizon,Maria João Feio,Ana Filipa Filipe,Riccardo Fornaroli,Wolfram Graf,Jelger Herder,Berry van der Hoorn,J. Iwan Jones,Marketa Sagova-Mareckova,Christian Moritz,José Barquín,Jeremy J. Piggott,Maurizio Pinna,Frédéric Rimet,B. Rinkevich,Carla Sousa-Santos,Valeria Specchia,Rosa Trobajo,Valentin Vasselon,Simon Vitecek,Jonas Zimmerman,Alexander M. Weigand,Florian Leese,Maria Kahlert +32 more
TL;DR: The main advantages and pitfalls of metabarcoding approaches to assess parameters such as richness, abundance, taxonomic composition and species ecological values, to be used for calculation of biotic indices are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive.
Daniel Hering,Ángel Borja,J. Iwan Jones,Didier Pont,Pieter Boets,Agnès Bouchez,Kat Bruce,Stina Drakare,Bernd Hänfling,Maria Kahlert,Florian Leese,Kristian Meissner,Patricia Mergen,Patricia Mergen,Yorick Reyjol,Pedro Segurado,Alfried P. Vogler,Martyn Kelly +17 more
TL;DR: Overall, suitability of DNA-based identification is particularly high for fish, as eDNA is a well-suited sampling approach which can replace expensive and potentially harmful methods such as gill-netting, trawling or electrofishing.
Journal ArticleDOI
Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms
Mathew Seymour,Isabelle Durance,Bernard J. Cosby,Emma Ransom-Jones,Kristy Deiner,Steve J. Ormerod,John K. Colbourne,Gregory Wilgar,Gary R. Carvalho,Mark de Bruyn,Mark de Bruyn,Francois Edwards,Bridget A. Emmett,Holly M. Bik,Simon Creer +14 more
TL;DR: Using four sets of upland stream mesocosms, Mathew Seymour et al. find that eDNA degrades to non-detectable levels within two days and this degradation is accelerated in acidic environments.
Journal ArticleDOI
The choice of universal primers and the characteristics of the species mixture determine when DNA metabarcoding can be quantitative
TL;DR: Depending on the primer pair used in the PCR amplification and on the characteristics of the mixture analysed (i.e., high species richness, low evenness), DNA metabarcoding can provide a quantitative estimate of the relative abundances of different species.
Journal ArticleDOI
Non-specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI
Rupert A. Collins,Judith Bakker,Judith Bakker,Owen S. Wangensteen,Owen S. Wangensteen,Ana Z. Soto,Laura Corrigan,David W. Sims,David W. Sims,Martin J. Genner,Stefano Mariani,Stefano Mariani +11 more
TL;DR: This work quantifies the in silico performance of twelve primer pairs from four mitochondrial loci – COI, cytochrome b, 12S and 16S – in terms of reference library coverage, taxonomic discriminatory power and primer universality, and test in vitro four primer pairs – three COI and one 12S – for their specificity, reproducibility, and congruence with independent datasets derived from traditional survey methods.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
TL;DR: The command-line tool cutadapt is developed, which supports 454, Illumina and SOLiD (color space) data, offers two adapter trimming algorithms, and has other useful features.
Journal Article
DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.
TL;DR: "universal"
Journal ArticleDOI
UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads
TL;DR: The UPARSE pipeline reports operational taxonomic unit (OTU) sequences with ≤1% incorrect bases in artificial microbial community tests, compared with >3% correct bases commonly reported by other methods.
Journal ArticleDOI
BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System: Barcoding
Journal ArticleDOI
A DNA-Based Registry for All Animal Species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) System
TL;DR: A persistent, species-level taxonomic registry for the animal kingdom is developed based on the analysis of patterns of nucleotide variation in the barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene.
Related Papers (5)
Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol
Vasco Elbrecht,Florian Leese +1 more