scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Interprofessional Education for Whom? — Challenges and Lessons Learned from Its Implementation in Developed Countries and Their Application to Developing Countries: A Systematic Review

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Ten important challenges on implementing IPE are found, including curriculum, leadership, resources, stereotypes, students' diversity, IPE concept, teaching, enthusiasm, professional jargons, and accreditation, which are potentially important for developing countries.
Abstract
Background Evidence is available on the potential efficacy of interprofessional education (IPE) to foster interprofessional cooperation, improve professional satisfaction, and improve patient care. While the intention of the World Health Organization (WHO) is to implement IPE in all countries, evidence comes from developed countries about its efficiency, challenges, and barriers to planning and implementing IPE. We therefore conducted this review to examine challenges of implementing IPE to suggest possible pathways to overcome the anticipated challenges in developing countries.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparative study of interprofessional education in global health care: A systematic review.

TL;DR: It is illustrated that the IPE programs vary substantially across countries, and there is a need to strengthen health education policies at global level aiming at initiating IPe programs in relevant institutions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Educação interprofissional e prática colaborativa na Atenção Primária à Saúde

TL;DR: In this article, a triangulacao dos resultados possibilitou a construcao of two different categories: pratica colaborativa, centred no usuario, and barreiras for educacao interprofissional.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using Simulation in Interprofessional Education

TL;DR: Interprofessional education (IPE), in which participants from 2 or more health or social care professions learn interactively, can help improve patient care through the promotion of efficient coordination, dissemination of advances in care across specialties and professions, and optimization of individual- and team-based function.
Journal ArticleDOI

A comprehensive systematic review of pharmacy perspectives on interprofessional education and collaborative practice.

TL;DR: Overall, the findings suggest that pharmacy students, practicing pharmacists and faculty valued interprofessional education and collaborative practice and had positive attitudes towards it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interprofessional pain education-with, from, and about competent, collaborative practice teams to transform pain care.

TL;DR: The 2018 IASP Global Year for Excellence in Pain Education is a call to action on multiple levels as discussed by the authors, which describes opportunities for mutual learning through interprofessional (IP) pain education.
References
More filters
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

TL;DR: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is introduced, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Rafael Lozano, +195 more
- 15 Dec 2012 - 
TL;DR: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 aimed to estimate annual deaths for the world and 21 regions between 1980 and 2010 for 235 causes, with uncertainty intervals (UIs), separately by age and sex, using the Cause of Death Ensemble model.
Related Papers (5)