It is shown that tuft cells, a rare epithelial cell type in the steady-state intestinal epithelium, are responsible for initiating type 2 responses to parasites by a cytokine-mediated cellular relay and a cellular relay required for initiating mucosal type 2 immunity to helminth infection.
Abstract:
Helminth parasitic infections are a major global health and social burden. The host defence against helminths such as Nippostrongylus brasiliensis is orchestrated by type 2 cell-mediated immunity. Induction of type 2 cytokines, including interleukins (IL) IL-4 and IL-13, induce goblet cell hyperplasia with mucus production, ultimately resulting in worm expulsion. However, the mechanisms underlying the initiation of type 2 responses remain incompletely understood. Here we show that tuft cells, a rare epithelial cell type in the steady-state intestinal epithelium, are responsible for initiating type 2 responses to parasites by a cytokine-mediated cellular relay. Tuft cells have a Th2-related gene expression signature and we demonstrate that they undergo a rapid and extensive IL-4Rα-dependent amplification following infection with helminth parasites, owing to direct differentiation of epithelial crypt progenitor cells. We find that the Pou2f3 gene is essential for tuft cell specification. Pou2f3(-/-) mice lack intestinal tuft cells and have defective mucosal type 2 responses to helminth infection; goblet cell hyperplasia is abrogated and worm expulsion is compromised. Notably, IL-4Rα signalling is sufficient to induce expansion of the tuft cell lineage, and ectopic stimulation of this signalling cascade obviates the need for tuft cells in the epithelial cell remodelling of the intestine. Moreover, tuft cells secrete IL-25, thereby regulating type 2 immune responses. Our data reveal a novel function of intestinal epithelial tuft cells and demonstrate a cellular relay required for initiating mucosal type 2 immunity to helminth infection.
Helminth parasitic infections are a major global health and social
burden
1
. The host defence against helminths such as Nippostrongylus
brasiliensis is orchestrated by type 2 cell-mediated immunity
2
.
Induction of type 2 cytokines, including interleukins (IL) IL-4
and IL-13, induce goblet cell hyperplasia with mucus production,
ultimately resulting in worm expulsion
3,4
. However, the mechanisms
underlying the initiation of type 2 responses remain incompletely
understood. Here we show that tuft cells, a rare epithelial cell type in
the steady-state intestinal epithelium
5
, are responsible for initiating
type 2 responses to parasites by a cytokine-mediated cellular
relay. Tuft cells have a Th2-related gene expression signature
6
and we demonstrate that they undergo a rapid and extensive IL-
4Rα-dependent amplification following infection with helminth
parasites, owing to direct differentiation of epithelial crypt
progenitor cells. We find that the Pou2f3 gene is essential for tuft
cell specification. Pou2f3
−/−
mice lack intestinal tuft cells and have
defective mucosal type 2 responses to helminth infection; goblet
cell hyperplasia is abrogated and worm expulsion is compromised.
Notably, IL-4Rα signalling is sufficient to induce expansion of the
tuft cell lineage, and ectopic stimulation of this signalling cascade
obviates the need for tuft cells in the epithelial cell remodelling of the
intestine. Moreover, tuft cells secrete IL-25, thereby regulating type 2
immune responses. Our data reveal a novel function of intestinal
epithelial tuft cells and demonstrate a cellular relay required for
initiating mucosal type 2 immunity to helminth infection.
Experimental subcutaneous infection of mice with N. brasiliensis
(Nb) stage 3 larvae induces a typical type-2 response that involves a
remodelling of epithelial cell populations, with goblet cell hyperplasia
visible as soon as 5 days post-infection
3,4
. Nb L3 larvae first migrate
from their injection site to the lungs, where they moult to the L4 stage,
are coughed up, and swallowed to reach the intestines (day 2 post infec-
tion) where they mature and lay eggs (starting 5 days post-infection).
Nb induces a rapid and robust type 2 response, resulting in worm expul-
sion by 6–8 days post infection.
While the doublecortin-like kinase 1 (Dclk1)-expressing tuft cells
represent only 0.4% of intestinal epithelial cells in naive mice
5
, we found
that Nb infection resulted in a 8.5-fold expansion in tuft cells (Fig. 1a, b),
first detected by 5 days post-infection in intestinal crypts, where pro-
liferative epithelial progenitor cells reside, and also in the villi by 7 days
post infection (Fig. 1c, Extended Data Fig. 1a). The kinetics of tuft
cell expansion was equivalent to that of goblet cells (Fig. 1d, Extended
Data Fig. 1b). Neo-differentiated tuft cells were indistinguishable from
tuft cells present in naive mice, as evaluated by expression of estab-
lished tuft cell markers, including Dclk1, Sry-related transcription fac-
tor 9 (Sox9), and phospholipase C gamma 2 (Plcγ2) (Extended Data
Fig.1c)
6–8
. All tuft cells, characterized by Dclk1 and growth factor
independent 1b (Gfi1b)
8
expression also co-expressed the Pou domain,
class 2, transcription factor 3 (Pou2f3) (Fig. 2a). In addition, rare
(<3%, n= 400 cells counted) Pou2f3
+
;Dclk1
low
or Pou2f3
+
;Dclk1
−
cells
1
CNRS, UMR-5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, F-34094 Montpellier, France.
2
INSERM, U1191, F-34094 Montpellier, France.
3
Université de Montpellier, F-34000 Montpellier, France.
4
Institute of Immunology and Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences and Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
5
Monell
Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
6
Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, CNRS, UMR5535, F-34293 Montpellier, France.
†Present address: Wellcome Trust Centre for Molecular Parasitology, Institute for Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.
ab
c
d
NaiveNb infected
NaiveNb infected
Naive
Nb infected
Tuft cells per crypt–villus axis
Naive
Nb
infected
0
5
10
15
20
25
P < 0.0001
Day 7Day 7
Day 7Day 7
Day 7Day 7
Day 4
Day 4
Day 5
Day 5
Figure 1 | Rapid amplification of the tuft cell lineage following infection
with Nb. a, Presence of tuft cells in the intestinal epithelia of naive and
Nb-infected mice 7 days post infection, visualized by expression of the
Dclk1 marker. b, 8.7-fold increase of tuft cell numbers (1.8 ± 1.4 to
15.6 ± 4.8 per crypt–villus axis) in Nb-infected mice compared to naive
mice, 7 days post infection. (n= 50 crypt–villus units per mouse; 3 mice
per condition). Data are shown as means ± s.d. (P< 0.0001, two-tailed
Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction). c, Changes in the Dclk1-expressing
tuft cell population in intestinal crypts are presented at the indicated time
points post infection. Quantification is shown in Extended Data Fig. 1a.
d, Corresponding goblet cell hyperplasia associated with numerous and
larger mucus vacuoles, detected by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining.
Dclk1 cells are also visualized in brown. Quantification is shown in
Extended Data Fig. 1b. Scale bars, 20 μm. All panels show representative
pictures of experiments replicated 3 times in 3 mice per condition.
TL;DR: The advances in ILC biology over the past decade are distill the advances to refine the nomenclature of ILCs and highlight the importance of I LCs in tissue homeostasis, morphogenesis, metabolism, repair, and regeneration.
TL;DR: This paper reported profiling of 53,193 individual epithelial cells from the small intestine and organoids of mice, which enabled the identification and characterization of previously unknown subtypes of intestinal epithelial cell and their gene signatures.
TL;DR: This Review highlights experimental evidence from mouse models and patient-based studies that have elucidated the effects of ILCs on the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and the consequences for health and disease.
TL;DR: The dominant cellular mediators of these interactions are reviewed and emerging themes associated with the current understanding of the homeostatic immunological dialogue between the host and its microbiota are discussed.
TL;DR: It is shown that tuft cells, which are taste-chemosensory epithelial cells, accumulate during parasite colonization and infection and are identified as critical sentinels in the gut epithelium that promote type 2 immunity in response to intestinal parasites.
TL;DR: It is concluded that intestinal cryptvillus units are self-organizing structures, which can be built from a single stem cell in the absence of a non-epithelial cellular niche.
TL;DR: The identification and functional characterization of a new innate type-2 immune effector leukocyte that is named the nuocyte is presented, which represents a critically important innate effector cell in type- 2 immunity.
TL;DR: In this article, a new type of innate lymphocyte present in a novel lymphoid structure associated with adipose tissues in the peritoneal cavity was reported. But these cells do not express lineage (Lin) markers but do express c-Kit, Sca-1 (also known as Ly6a), IL7R and IL33R.
TL;DR: New insights into fundamental helminth biology are accumulating through newly completed genome projects and the nascent application of transgenesis and RNA interference technologies, which should one day translate into a new and robust pipeline of drugs, diagnostics, and vaccines for targeting parasitic worms that infect humans.
TL;DR: This Review discusses recent advances in defining the immune cell types and molecules that are mobilized in response to helminth infection and more broadly considers how these immunological players are blended and regulated in order to accommodate persistent infection or to mount a vigorous protective response and achieve sterile immunity.
Q1. What is the role of tuft cells in the induction of type 2 responses?
In the absence of tuft cells, IL-25 and IL-13 expression remain low, and type 2 mucosal responses and worm expulsion are delayed.
Q2. What was the method used for the detection of RNA probes?
Hybridized probes were immunohistochemically detected using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche Diagnostics) and biotin-conjugated antifluorescein antibody (Vector Laboratories).
Q3. What is the role of IL-4 in the retnl expression in Pou?
As both IL-4 and IL-13 type 2 cytokines are known to regulate Retnlβ expression3, and IL-4 is dispensable during type 2 responses to Nb25, their data strongly suggest that defective IL-13 production is responsible for the decreased Retnlβ expression in Nb-infected Pou2f3−/− mice.
Q4. What is the role of tuft cells in the intestinal epithelium?
Here the authors show that tuft cells, a rare epithelial cell type in the steady-state intestinal epithelium5, are responsible for initiating type 2 responses to parasites by a cytokine-mediated cellular relay.
Q5. What is the role of tuft cells in the helminth immune response?
Their study demonstrates a requirement for tuft cells upstream of IL-4/IL-13, with these cytokines driving tuft cell hyperplasia, thereby amplifying a feed-forward loop to orchestrate a rapid and effective anti-helminth immunity (Fig. 4e).
Q6. How early did the tuft cell population increase in wild-type organoids?
in wild-type organoids, the tuft cell population increased as early as 48 h following addition of rIL-4/rIL-13 (Extended Data Fig. 8a, b).
Q7. What is the role of tuft cells in Pou2f3/ mice?
treatment of Pou2f3−/− mice with rIL-4/rIL-13 also resulted in goblet as well as Paneth cell hyperplasia, indicating a function of tuft cells upstream of IL-4/IL-13 (Extended DataFig. 7c, d).
Q8. What is the function of tuft cells in initiating the mucosal type 2 responses?
their data identify a novel function of tuft cells in initiating the mucosal type 2 responses with a positive feedback loop through IL-13-producing immune cells that, in turn, amplify the tuft cell lineage.
Q9. how was retnl expression in goblet cells delayed?
Retnlβ expression was found predominantly in crypts and was therefore delayed compared to the onset of goblet cell hyperplasia (Extended Data Fig. 7c), and quantitatively lower than in an infectious context (Fig. 3c).