scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The results prove the proposed method can act as a measurement tool for the entire KM of an organization and is generic in nature and applicable to benefit an organization.
Abstract
This paper proposes an approach of measuring a technology university's knowledge management (KM) performance from competitive perspective. The approach integrates analytical network process (ANP), which is a theory of multiple criteria decision-making and is good at dealing with tangible and intangible information, with balanced scorecard (BSC) that contains four perspectives, including customer perspective, internal business perspective, innovation and learning perspective, and financial perspective, being adopted as the indicators of KM performance measurement (KMPM). This paper makes three important contributions: (1) it propose a methodology of comparing an organization's knowledge management performance with its major rivals to offer effective information for improving KM, increasing decision-making quality, and obtaining clear effort direction of attaining competitive advantage; (2) it explores the case involving a lot of findings that present the positions of the case organization against it major rivals and imply that the technology university has to reinforce knowledge creation and accumulation to catch up with its competitive rivals; and (3) it is generic in nature and applicable to benefit an organization. The results prove the proposed method can act as a measurement tool for the entire KM of an organization.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Determinants of firms' knowledge management system implementation: An empirical study

TL;DR: The results show that technological innovation factors (perceived benefits, complexity, and compatibility), organizational factors (top management support, organizational culture), and environmental factors (competitive pressure) are significant influences on KMS implementation in firms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of knowledge management performance

TL;DR: The organic KM performance evaluation approach demonstrated by this study has significant potential to improve the alignment of KM strategy within an increasingly dynamic business environment.

MCDM Methodologies and Applications: A Literature Review from 1999 to 2009

TL;DR: ‘state-of-the-art' reviews and the most recent advances by leading experts on the fundamental theories, methodologies and applications of MCDM are brought together.
Journal ArticleDOI

Revealing performance heterogeneity through knowledge management maturity evaluation: A capability-based approach

Abstract: The dynamic capabilities view (DCV) focuses on renewal of firms' strategic knowledge resources so as to sustain competitive advantage within turbulent markets. Within the context of the DCV, the focus of knowledge management (KM) is to develop the KMC through deploying knowledge governance mechanisms that are conducive to facilitating knowledge processes so as to produce superior business performance over time. The essence of KM performance evaluation is to assess how well the KMC is configured with knowledge governance mechanisms and processes that enable a firm to achieve superior performance through matching its knowledge base with market needs. However, little research has been undertaken to evaluate KM performance from the DCV perspective. This study employed a survey study design and adopted hypothesis-testing approaches to develop a capability-based KM evaluation framework (CKMEF) that upholds the basic assertions of the DCV. Under the governance of the framework, a KM index (KMI) and a KM maturity model (KMMM) were derived not only to indicate the extent to which a firm's KM implementations fulfill its strategic objectives, and to identify the evolutionary phase of its KMC, but also to bench-mark the KMC in the research population. The research design ensured that the evaluation framework and instruments have statistical significance and good generalizabilty to be applied in the research population, namely construction firms operating in the dynamic Hong Kong construction market. The study demonstrated the feasibility of quantitatively evaluating the development of the KMC and revealing the performance heterogeneity associated with the development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Linking knowledge management orientation to balanced scorecard outcomes

TL;DR: This study finds that knowledge sharing is the strongest predictor of internal process performance, while knowledge absorption is pivotal in improving customer satisfaction.
References
More filters
Book

The Knowledge Creating Company

TL;DR: The Japanese companies, masters of manufacturing, have also been leaders in the creation, management, and use of knowledge-especially the tacit and often subjective insights, intuitions, and ideas of employees as discussed by the authors.
Book

The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance

TL;DR: A "balanced scorecard" is developed, a new performance measurement system that gives top managers a fast but comprehensive view of the business and complements those financial measures with three sets of operational measures having to do with customer satisfaction, internal processes, and the organization's ability to learn and improve.
Journal ArticleDOI

Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues

TL;DR: The objective of KMS is to support creation, transfer, and application of knowledge in organizations by promoting a class of information systems, referred to as knowledge management systems.
Journal Article

Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system

TL;DR: The concept of balanced scorecard was introduced by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton as mentioned in this paper to measure performance from three additional perspectives: customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth.