scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Primary Care COPD Patients Compared with Large Pharmaceutically-Sponsored COPD Studies : An UNLOCK Validation Study

TLDR
Primary care COPD patients stand out from patients enrolled in LPCS in terms of gender, lung function, quality of life and exacerbations, as hitherto unknown GOLD I exacerbation characteristics are revealed.
Abstract
Background: Guideline recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on the results of large pharmaceutically-sponsored COPD studies (LPCS). There is a paucity of data on disease characteristics at the primary care level, while the majority of COPD patients are treated in primary care. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the external validity of six LPCS (ISOLDE, TRISTAN, TORCH, UPLIFT, ECLIPSE, POET-COPD) on which current guidelines are based, in relation to primary care COPD patients, in order to inform future clinical practice guidelines and trials. Methods: Baseline data of seven primary care databases (n = 3508) from Europe were compared to baseline data of the LPCS. In addition, we examined the proportion of primary care patients eligible to participate in the LPCS, based on inclusion criteria. Results: Overall, patients included in the LPCS were younger (mean difference (MD)-2.4; p = 0.03), predominantly male (MD 12.4; p = 0.1) with worse lung function (FEV1% MD -16.4; p = 1 and >= 2 exacerbations, although results were not statistically significant. Our findings add to the literature, as we revealed hitherto unknown GOLD I exacerbation characteristics, showing 34% of mild patients had >= 1 exacerbations per year and 12% had >= 2 exacerbations per year. The proportion of primary care patients eligible for inclusion in LPCS ranged from 17% (TRISTAN) to 42% (ECLIPSE, UPLIFT). Conclusion: Primary care COPD patients stand out from patients enrolled in LPCS in terms of gender, lung function, quality of life and exacerbations. More research is needed to determine the effect of pharmacological treatment in mild to moderate patients. We encourage future guideline makers to involve primary care populations in their recommendations.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Associations between chronic comorbidity and exacerbation risk in primary care patients with COPD

TL;DR: Having another chronic respiratory disease beside COPD showed the highest risk for developing a new exacerbation and several chronic comorbidities were associated with having frequent exacerbations and increased exacerbation risk.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comorbidity and health-related quality of life in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attending Swedish secondary care units.

TL;DR: It is concluded that comorbid conditions, in particular chronic bronchitis, depression, osteoporosis, and musculoskeletal symptoms, should be taken into account in the clinical management of patients with severe COPD.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving the Management of COPD in Women.

TL;DR: A multifaceted approach is required to address COPD in women, including greater awareness, minimization of risk, and further elucidation of the sex-specific factors that affect risk, disease progression, and treatment success.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meeting the challenge of COPD care delivery in the USA: a multiprovider perspective

TL;DR: This Commission summarises expert opinion from key stakeholders-patients, caregivers, and medical professionals, as well as representatives from health systems, insurance companies, and industry-to understand barriers to care delivery and propose potential solutions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting frequent COPD exacerbations using primary care data

TL;DR: Patients at risk of exacerbation can be identified from routinely available, computerized primary care data and a robust, clinically based model to predict frequent exacerbation risk was developed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

TL;DR: The MRC dyspnoea scale is a simple and valid method of categorising patients with COPD in terms of their disability that could be used to complement FEV1 in the classification of COPD severity.
Journal ArticleDOI

A 4-Year Trial of Tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

TL;DR: Therapy with tiotropium was associated with improvements in lung function, quality of life, and exacerbations during a 4-year period but did not significantly reduce the rate of decline in FEV(1).
Journal ArticleDOI

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the ISOLDE trial

TL;DR: Improvements in clinical outcomes support the use of this treatment in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as patients on fluticasone propionate had fewer exacerbations and a slower decline in health status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combined salmeterol and fluticasone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial.

TL;DR: In this article, a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study with inhaled long-acting β 2 agonists and corticosteroid combination treatment produces better control of symptoms and lung function, with no greater risk of side-effects than that with use of either component alone.
Related Papers (5)