scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Primary Care COPD Patients Compared with Large Pharmaceutically-Sponsored COPD Studies : An UNLOCK Validation Study

TLDR
Primary care COPD patients stand out from patients enrolled in LPCS in terms of gender, lung function, quality of life and exacerbations, as hitherto unknown GOLD I exacerbation characteristics are revealed.
Abstract
Background: Guideline recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on the results of large pharmaceutically-sponsored COPD studies (LPCS). There is a paucity of data on disease characteristics at the primary care level, while the majority of COPD patients are treated in primary care. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the external validity of six LPCS (ISOLDE, TRISTAN, TORCH, UPLIFT, ECLIPSE, POET-COPD) on which current guidelines are based, in relation to primary care COPD patients, in order to inform future clinical practice guidelines and trials. Methods: Baseline data of seven primary care databases (n = 3508) from Europe were compared to baseline data of the LPCS. In addition, we examined the proportion of primary care patients eligible to participate in the LPCS, based on inclusion criteria. Results: Overall, patients included in the LPCS were younger (mean difference (MD)-2.4; p = 0.03), predominantly male (MD 12.4; p = 0.1) with worse lung function (FEV1% MD -16.4; p = 1 and >= 2 exacerbations, although results were not statistically significant. Our findings add to the literature, as we revealed hitherto unknown GOLD I exacerbation characteristics, showing 34% of mild patients had >= 1 exacerbations per year and 12% had >= 2 exacerbations per year. The proportion of primary care patients eligible for inclusion in LPCS ranged from 17% (TRISTAN) to 42% (ECLIPSE, UPLIFT). Conclusion: Primary care COPD patients stand out from patients enrolled in LPCS in terms of gender, lung function, quality of life and exacerbations. More research is needed to determine the effect of pharmacological treatment in mild to moderate patients. We encourage future guideline makers to involve primary care populations in their recommendations.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Associations between chronic comorbidity and exacerbation risk in primary care patients with COPD

TL;DR: Having another chronic respiratory disease beside COPD showed the highest risk for developing a new exacerbation and several chronic comorbidities were associated with having frequent exacerbations and increased exacerbation risk.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comorbidity and health-related quality of life in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attending Swedish secondary care units.

TL;DR: It is concluded that comorbid conditions, in particular chronic bronchitis, depression, osteoporosis, and musculoskeletal symptoms, should be taken into account in the clinical management of patients with severe COPD.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving the Management of COPD in Women.

TL;DR: A multifaceted approach is required to address COPD in women, including greater awareness, minimization of risk, and further elucidation of the sex-specific factors that affect risk, disease progression, and treatment success.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meeting the challenge of COPD care delivery in the USA: a multiprovider perspective

TL;DR: This Commission summarises expert opinion from key stakeholders-patients, caregivers, and medical professionals, as well as representatives from health systems, insurance companies, and industry-to understand barriers to care delivery and propose potential solutions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting frequent COPD exacerbations using primary care data

TL;DR: Patients at risk of exacerbation can be identified from routinely available, computerized primary care data and a robust, clinically based model to predict frequent exacerbation risk was developed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger "real life" population of patients with obstructive lung disease?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare the OLD population recruited from GP's and specialist outpatient clinics, respectively, and conclude that "evidence based" treatment decisions for OLD are based on studies which include a very small and highly selected fraction of this patient population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Disease severity and the effect of fluticasone propionate on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

TL;DR: Recommendations in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Disease treatment guidelines that inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in patients with moderate‐to‐severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who experience recurrent exacerbations are supported.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex bias in trials and treatment must end

TL;DR: Call on journals, funding agencies and researchers to give women parity with men, in studies and in the clinic, in the first of three related pieces.
Journal ArticleDOI

The TORCH (towards a revolution in COPD health) survival study protocol.

TL;DR: The “TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health” study is aiming to determine the impact of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) combination and the individual components on the survival of COPD patients and explains the rationale behind it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Practice Patterns in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Primary Practice: The Cage Study

TL;DR: Substantial gaps between recommended and current care exist in the management of COPD patients in primary care practice in Quebec and Ontario and undertreatment of patients with severe COPD has potential clinical implications, including loss of autonomy and hospitalization.
Related Papers (5)