The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P T Higgins,Douglas G. Altman,Peter C Gøtzsche,Peter Jüni,David Moher,Andrew D Oxman,Jelena Savović,Kenneth F. Schulz,Laura Weeks,Jonathan A C Sterne +9 more
TLDR
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate.Abstract:
Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurateread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Functional and/or structural brain changes in response to resistance exercises and resistance training lead to cognitive improvements – a systematic review
TL;DR: Based on the analyses, resistance exercises and resistance training evoked substantial functional brain changes, especially in the frontal lobe, which were accompanied by improvements in executive functions, which could be crucial for healthy aging that includes preservation of the brain and cognition.
Journal ArticleDOI
Mindfulness-based interventions for psychological and physical health outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
TL;DR: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of MBIs on measures of psychological distress (primary outcome) and other health outcomes in cancer patients and survivors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Internet- and mobile-based interventions for anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review of intervention components.
TL;DR: The first comprehensive meta‐analytic review of intervention components of IMIs for adult anxiety disorders is conducted, finding that Internet‐ and mobile‐based interventions for anxiety is established but little is known about the intervention components responsible for therapeutic change.
Journal ArticleDOI
A systematic review of interventions to increase awareness of mental health and well-being in athletes, coaches and officials
TL;DR: There was substantial heterogeneity and limited validity in the outcome measures of mental health knowledge and referral efficacy, and well-designed controlled intervention studies are required.
Journal ArticleDOI
Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review
Anna R. Gagliardi,Samia Alhabib +1 more
TL;DR: Few studies were eligible, limiting insight on how to choose implementation strategies that address guideline-specific barriers, and mapping of strategies onto the published taxonomy identified gaps in guideline implementation that represent opportunities for future research and expanded the taxonomy.
References
More filters
Book
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Julian P T Higgins,Sally Green +1 more
TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
Journal Article
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Journal ArticleDOI
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Regina Kunz,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Holger J. Schünemann +6 more
TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
Book ChapterDOI
Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a new algorithm called 1.8.1.1-2.0-1.8-1/2.8/1/1.
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
TL;DR: The concept of study quality and the methods used to assess quality are discussed and the methodology for both the assessment of quality and its incorporation into systematic reviews and meta-analysis is discussed.