scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

TLDR
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate.
Abstract
Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

American Geriatrics Society abstracted clinical practice guideline for postoperative delirium in older adults

TL;DR: The goals of this guideline are to decrease delirium severity and duration, ensure patient safety and improve outcomes, and to present nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions that should be implemented perioperatively for the treatment of postoperativedelirium in older adults.
Journal ArticleDOI

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study

TL;DR: Treatment effect estimates differed within meta-analyses solely based on trial sample size, with stronger effect estimates seen in small to moderately sized trials than in the largest trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer: A 2013 Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

TL;DR: An updated and improved meta-analysis of randomized trials provides further evidence of an overall survival and disease-free survival benefit in patients with MIBC receiving adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after radical cystectomy.
References
More filters
Book

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
Book ChapterDOI

Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a new algorithm called 1.8.1.1-2.0-1.8-1/2.8/1/1.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

TL;DR: The concept of study quality and the methods used to assess quality are discussed and the methodology for both the assessment of quality and its incorporation into systematic reviews and meta-analysis is discussed.
Related Papers (5)