scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

TLDR
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate.
Abstract
Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Given the higher number of biological complications, increased morbidity, costs and surgical time of longer dental implants in the augmented sinus, shorter dental implants may represent the preferred treatment alternative.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Treatment for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: Cognitive behavioural interventions yield long-term improvements in pain, disability and quality of life in comparison to no treatment and other guideline-based active treatments for patients with LBP of any duration and of any age.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of treatments for Helicobacter pylori: systematic review and network meta-analysis

TL;DR: Comparison of different eradication treatments for H pylori showed that concomitant treatments, 10 or 14 days of probiotic supplemented triple treatment, 10 either of levofloxacin based triple treatment or 10 or14 days of sequential treatment might be better alternatives for the eradication of H pylonori.
References
More filters
Book

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
Book ChapterDOI

Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a new algorithm called 1.8.1.1-2.0-1.8-1/2.8/1/1.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

TL;DR: The concept of study quality and the methods used to assess quality are discussed and the methodology for both the assessment of quality and its incorporation into systematic reviews and meta-analysis is discussed.
Related Papers (5)