scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The Prevalence of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting a prevalence of NAFLD based on any diagnostic method in participants 1-19 years old, regardless of the main aim of the study.
Abstract
Background & Aims Narrative reviews of paediatric NAFLD quote prevalences in the general population that range from 9% to 37%; however, no systematic review of the prevalence of NAFLD in children/adolescents has been conducted. We aimed to estimate prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in young people and to determine whether this varies by BMI category, gender, age, diagnostic method, geographical region and study sample size. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting a prevalence of NAFLD based on any diagnostic method in participants 1–19 years old, regardless of whether assessing NAFLD prevalence was the main aim of the study. Results The pooled mean prevalence of NAFLD in children from general population studies was 7.6% (95%CI: 5.5% to 10.3%) and 34.2% (95% CI: 27.8% to 41.2%) in studies based on child obesity clinics. In both populations there was marked heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 98%). There was evidence that prevalence was generally higher in males compared with females and increased incrementally with greater BMI. There was evidence for differences between regions in clinical population studies, with estimated prevalence being highest in Asia. There was no evidence that prevalence changed over time. Prevalence estimates in studies of children/adolescents attending obesity clinics and in obese children/adolescents from the general population were substantially lower when elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was used to assess NAFLD compared with biopsies, ultrasound scan (USS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Conclusions Our review suggests the prevalence of NAFLD in young people is high, particularly in those who are obese and in males.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease.

TL;DR: Experts reached consensus that NAFLD does not reflect current knowledge and metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease "MAFLD" was suggested as a more appropriate overarching term and opens the door for efforts from the research community to update the nomenclature and sub-phenotype the disease in order to accelerate the translational path to new treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Evidence is provided supporting high prevalence of NAFLD and NASH in patients with T2DM around the world and regional and global mean prevalence weighted by population size in each country were estimated and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

Meta-analysis of prevalence

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present methods for the meta-analysis of prevalence of multiple sclerosis using logit and double arcsine transformations to stabilise the variance and propose solutions to the problems that arise.
Journal ArticleDOI

New trends on obesity and NAFLD in Asia

TL;DR: The epidemiological trend of obesity in Asia is reviewed, with special emphasis on the emerging condition of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and pharmacological agents have entered phase III development for steatohepatitis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

TL;DR: A new quantity is developed, I 2, which the authors believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis, which is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta- analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

TL;DR: The examples considered in this paper show the tension between the scientific rationale for using meta-regression and the difficult interpretative problems to which such analyses are prone.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.

TL;DR: Summary estimates of treatment effect from random effects meta-analysis give only the average effect across all studies, but inclusion of prediction intervals, which estimate the likely effect in an individual setting, could make it easier to apply the results to clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Publication and related bias in meta-analysis : power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature

TL;DR: Tests for small-study effects should routinely be performed in meta-analysis, particularly for moderate amounts of bias or meta-analyses based on a small number of small studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Updated Definitions of Healthy Ranges for Serum Alanine Aminotransferase Levels

TL;DR: This study redefined ALT limits in blood donors at low risk for NAFLD and without hepatitis B or C and tested the sensitivity and specificity of the ranges obtained from these participants in the clinical evaluation of anti-HCVpositive persons with and without chronic liver damage.
Related Papers (5)