Showing papers on "Afatinib published in 2020"
TL;DR: Afatinib has clinical activity in NSCLC against major uncommon and compound EGFR mutations and some exon 20 insertions and has broad activity against other uncommon EGFR mutation and someExon 20insertions.
149 citations
TL;DR: Major efforts are underway to effectively target the tumor microenvironment and to integrate immunotherapy into the treatment of PDAC, and although thus far the impact has been modest to ineffective, nonetheless, there is optimism that some of the challenges will be overcome.
Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage, with systemic therapy being the mainstay of treatment. Survival continues to be limited, typically less than 1 year. The PDAC microenvironment is characterized by a paucity of malignant epithelial cells, abundant stroma with predominantly immunosuppressive T cells and myelosuppressive-type macrophages (M2), and hypovascularity. The current treatment options for metastatic PDAC are modified (m)FOLFIRINOX /FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with good performance status (PS) (ECOG 0-1/KPS 70-100%) and gemcitabine with or without a second agent for those with ECOG PS 2-3. New therapies are emerging, and the current guidelines endorse both germline and somatic testing in PDAC to evaluate actionable findings. Important themes related to new therapeutic approaches include DNA damage repair strategies, immunotherapy, targeting the stroma, and cancer-cell metabolism. Targeted therapy alone (outside small genomically defined subsets) or in combination with standard cytotoxic therapy, thus far, has proven disappointing in PDAC; however, novel therapies are evolving with increased integration of genomic profiling along with a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and immunology. A small but important sub-group of patients have some of these agents available in the clinics for use. Olaparib was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for maintenance therapy in germline BRCA1/2 mutated PDAC following demonstration of survival benefit in a phase 3 trial. Pembrolizumab is approved for patients with defects in mismatch repair/microsatellite instability. PDAC with wild-type KRAS represents a unique subgroup who have enrichment of potentially targetable oncogenic drivers. Small-molecule inhibitors including ERBB inhibitors (e.g., afatinib, MCLA-128), TRK inhibitors (e.g., larotrectinib, entrectinib), ALK/ROS inhibitor (e.g., crizotinib), and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are in development. In a small subset of patients with the KRASG12C mutation, a KRASG12C inhibitor, AMG510, and other agents are being investigated. Major efforts are underway to effectively target the tumor microenvironment and to integrate immunotherapy into the treatment of PDAC, and although thus far the impact has been modest to ineffective, nonetheless, there is optimism that some of the challenges will be overcome.
84 citations
TL;DR: The present review has examined the pharmacologic characteristics and current clinical data for EGFR TKIs, including emerging information on the molecular mechanisms of resistance across the different generations of TKI, to help determine the treatment decisions.
73 citations
TL;DR: It is revealed that the combination of osimertinib with the pan-HER small molecular inhibitor, afatinib, could synergistically repress cell growth and signaling in H1975-HER2D16 cells.
47 citations
TL;DR: The results of this study are consistent with clinical observation, suggesting the usefulness of pharmacovigilance research should be corroborated with the real-world FAERS data.
Abstract: Adverse event reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were analyzed to map the safety profile of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). We conducted a disproportionality analysis of the adverse events (AEs) of EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, osimertinib) by data mining using the FDA adverse event reporting system (AERS) database, and by calculating the reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals. The FDA AERS database contained 27,123 EGFR-TKI-associated AERs within the reporting period from January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2018. Thirty-three preferred terms (PTs) were selected for analysis, and significant RORs were most commonly observed in the skin, nail, gastrointestinal tract, hepatic, eyes, and lungs. Unexpected adverse drug reactions were found in the "intestinal obstruction" and "hypokalaemia" in gefitinib and erlotinib, "hyponatraemia" in gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib, "alopecia"in erlotinib, "hair growth abnormal" in afatinib, but not in "nausea" and "vomiting" listed on drug labels. The results of this study are consistent with clinical observation, suggesting the usefulness of pharmacovigilance research should be corroborated with the real-world FAERS data.
43 citations
TL;DR: A detailed overview of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of afatinib is provided, treatment sequencing strategies following emergence of different resistance mechanisms are discussed, and light is shed on the economic impact of the drug.
Abstract: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The availability of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for use in the first-line or later settings in NSCLC warrants an in-depth understanding of the pharmacological properties of, and clinical data supporting, these agents. The second-generation, irreversible ErbB-family blocker, afatinib, has been extensively studied in the context of EGFRm+ NSCLC. Results from the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 studies showed that afatinib was more active and better tolerated than chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations. Subanalysis of these trials, along with real-world data, indicates that afatinib is active in patients with certain uncommon EGFR mutations (S768I/G719X/L861Q) as well as common mutations (Del19/L858R), and in patients with active brain metastases. In LUX-Lung 7, a head-to-head phase IIb trial, afatinib improved progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure versus the first-generation reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib, albeit with a higher incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events. Nevertheless, afatinib is generally well tolerated, and adverse events are manageable through supportive care and a well-defined tolerability-guided dose adjustment scheme. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of afatinib, discuss treatment sequencing strategies following emergence of different resistance mechanisms, and shed light on the economic impact of afatinib. We also provide a comparison of afatinib with the available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and discuss its position within treatment strategies for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.
41 citations
TL;DR: The addition of cetuximab to afatinib did not improve outcomes in previously untreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC, despite recognized activity in the acquired resistance setting.
Abstract: PURPOSEThe irreversible ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib plus the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab was previously shown to overcome resistance to EGFR TKIs. We studied whether...
41 citations
TL;DR: The present data suggest that different HER2 mutations in lung cancer derive sustained clinical benefits from afatinib, whereas the predominant variant, A775_G776insYVMA, is resistant to most anti-HER2 treatments.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-mutant lung cancer remains an orphan of specific targeted therapy. The variable responses to anti-HER2 therapies in these patients prompt us to examine impact of HER2 variants and co-mutations on responses to anti-HER2 treatments in lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IV/recurrent HER2-mutant lung cancers identified through next-generation sequencings were recruited from seven hospitals. The study comprised a cohort A to establish the patterns of HER2 variants and co-mutations in lung cancer and a cohort B to assess associations between HER2 variants, co-mutations, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS The study included 118 patients (cohort A, n = 86; cohort B, n = 32). Thirty-one HER2 variants and 35 co-mutations were detected. Predominant variants were A775_G776insYVMA (49/118, 42%), G778_P780dup (11/118, 9%), and G776delinsVC (9/118, 8%). TP53 was the most common co-mutation (61/118, 52%). In cohort B, objective response rates with afatinib were 0% (0/14, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-26.8%), 40% (4/10, 14.7%-72.6%), and 13% (1/8, 0.7%-53.3%) in group 1 (A775_G776insYVMA, n = 14), group 2 (G778_P780dup, G776delinsVC, n = 10), and group 3 (missense mutation, n = 8), respectively (p = .018). Median progression-free survival in group 1 (1.2 months; 95% CI, 0-2.4) was shorter than those in group 2 (7.6 months, 4.9-10.4; hazard ratio [HR], 0.009; 95% CI, 0.001-0.079; p < .001) and group 3 (3.6 months, 2.6-4.5; HR, 0.184; 95% CI, 0.062-0.552; p = .003). TP53 co-mutations (6.317; 95% CI, 2.180-18.302; p = .001) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activations (19.422; 95% CI, 4.098-92.039; p < .001) conferred additional resistance to afatinib. CONCLUSION G778_P780dup and G776delinsVC derived the greatest benefits from afatinib among HER2 variants. Co-mutation patterns were additional response modifiers. Refining patient population based on patterns of HER2 variants and co-mutations may help improve the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatment in lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-mutant lung cancers are a group of heterogenous diseases with up to 31 different variants and 35 concomitant genomic aberrations. Different HER2 variants exhibit divergent sensitivities to anti-HER2 treatments. Certain variants, G778_P780dup and G776delinsVC, derive sustained clinical benefits from afatinib, whereas the predominant variant, A775_G776insYVMA, is resistant to most anti-HER2 treatments. TP53 is the most common co-mutation in HER2-mutant lung cancers. Co-mutations in TP53 and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway confer additional resistance to anti-HER2 treatments in lung cancer. The present data suggest that different HER2 mutations in lung cancer, like its sibling epidermal growth factor receptor, should be analyzed independently in future studies.
40 citations
TL;DR: In real-world clinical practice, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, especially in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients.
Abstract: Aim: Final overall survival (OS) and time on treatment analysis of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib. Patients & methods: Patients (n = 203) had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ≥10 months before data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment; OS analysis was exploratory. Results: Median time on treatment with afatinib and osimertinib was 27.7 months (90% CI: 26.7-29.9). Median OS was 37.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-41.3); median OS was 41.6 and 44.8 months in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients, respectively. Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, especially in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
39 citations
TL;DR: Analysis of circulating free DNA data from patients and modeled acquired resistance to osimertinib in transgenic mouse models of EGFRL858R-induced lung adenocarcinoma found that it is mediated largely through secondary mutations in EGFR—either C797S or L718V/Q.
Abstract: Osimertinib, a mutant-specific third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is emerging as the preferred first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant lung cancer, yet resistance inevitably develops in patients. We modeled acquired resistance to osimertinib in transgenic mouse models of EGFRL858R -induced lung adenocarcinoma and found that it is mediated largely through secondary mutations in EGFR-either C797S or L718V/Q. Analysis of circulating free DNA data from patients revealed that L718Q/V mutations almost always occur in the context of an L858R driver mutation. Therapeutic testing in mice revealed that both erlotinib and afatinib caused regression of osimertinib-resistant C797S-containing tumors, whereas only afatinib was effective on L718Q mutant tumors. Combination first-line osimertinib plus erlotinib treatment prevented the emergence of secondary mutations in EGFR. These findings highlight how knowledge of the specific characteristics of resistance mutations is important for determining potential subsequent treatment approaches and suggest strategies to overcome or prevent osimertinib resistance in vivo. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insight into the biological and molecular properties of osimertinib resistance EGFR mutations and evaluates therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/80/10/2017/F1.large.jpg.
39 citations
TL;DR: This study addressed whether ERK inhibition exerts effects similar to those produced by MEK inhibition in overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Osimertinib (AZD9291), a third-generation, mutation-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is an approved drug for patients who have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations or those harboring a resistant T790M mutation. Unfortunately, all patients eventually relapse and develop resistance to osimertinib. The current study addressed whether ERK inhibition exerts effects similar to those produced by MEK inhibition in overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib. METHODS Drug effects on cell and tumor growth were assessed by measuring cell number alterations and colony formation in vitro and with xenografts in nude mice in vivo. Apoptosis was assessed with annexin V/flow cytometry and protein cleavage. Protein alterations in cells were detected with Western blot analysis. Gene overexpression and knockout were achieved with lentiviral infection and CRISPR/Cas9, respectively. RESULTS The combination of osimertinib with an ERK inhibitor synergistically decreased the survival of osimertinib-resistant cell lines with enhanced induction of apoptosis and effectively inhibited the growth of osimertinib-resistant xenografts in nude mice. Moreover, the combination of an MEK or ERK inhibitor with a first-generation (eg, erlotinib) or second-generation (eg, afatinib) EGFR-TKI also very effectively inhibited the growth of osimertinib-resistant cells in vitro and of tumors in vivo, although these cell lines were cross-resistant to first-generation or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSIONS The current findings emphasize the importance of targeting MEK/ERK signaling in maintaining the long-term benefit of osimertinib through overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib, warranting further investigation of this therapeutic strategy to improve the therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib in the clinic.
13 May 2020
TL;DR: This is the largest report to confirm that the EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA mutation is sensitive to clinically available first-, second-, third-generation, and in-development EGFR TKIs.
Abstract: Introduction The EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA is a unique exon 20 insertion mutation (∼5% to 6% of exon 20 insertions), which, at the structural and enzyme kinetic level, more closely resembles EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)–sensitizing mutants, such as EGFR exon 19 indels and L858R. A limited number of preclinical models and clinical reports have studied the response of this mutant to EGFR TKIs. Methods We used models of EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA and more typical EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to probe representative first- (gefitinib, erlotinib), second- (afatinib), third-generation (osimertinib), and in-development EGFR exon 20–specific (poziotinib, mobocertinib [TAK-788]) TKIs. We also compiled outcomes of EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA-mutated lung cancers treated with EGFR TKIs. Results Cells driven by EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA were consistently sensitive to EGFR TKIs (as opposed to those driven by typical EGFR exon 20 insertions [A767_V769dupASV, D770_N771insSVD and H773_V774insH]), which were only inhibited by in-development EGFR TKIs at doses below those affecting wild-type EGFR. Most case instances (62.5% [95% confidence interval: 39%–86%], n = 16) with lung cancers harboring EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA responded to clinically available EGFR TKIs (including osimertinib) and to in-development EGFR exon 20-specific TKIs (including mobocertinib) with prolonged periods of progression-free survival in some cases. Median overall survival for EGFR TKI–treated cases was 22 months (95% confidence interval: 16–25). Mechanisms of acquired TKI resistance of this mutant remain underreported, but do seem to align with those of common mutations. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the largest report to confirm that the EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA mutation is sensitive to clinically available first-, second-, third-generation, and in-development EGFR TKIs.
TL;DR: The known single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the HER2 gene found in HER2-positive breast cancer patients and their relationship with clinical outcomes suggest that exploring HER2 SNPs in each patient could help individualize anti-HER2 therapies.
Abstract: In one of every four or five cases of breast cancer, the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) gene is overexpressed. These carcinomas are known as HER2-positive. HER2 overexpression is linked to an aggressive phenotype and a lower rate of disease-free and overall survival. Drugs such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, and the more recent afatinib target the deregulation of HER2 expression. Some authors have attributed somatic mutations in HER2, a role in resistance to anti-HER2 therapy as differential regulation of HER2 has been observed among patients. Recently, studies in metastatic ER + tumors suggest that some HER2 mutations emerge as a mechanism of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy. In an effort to identify possible biomarkers of the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy, we here review the known single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the HER2 gene found in HER2-positive breast cancer patients and their relationship with clinical outcomes. Information was recompiled on 11 somatic HER2 SNPs. Seven polymorphisms are located in the tyrosine kinase domain region of the gene contrasting with the low number of mutations found in extracellular and transmembrane areas. HER2-positive patients carrying S310F, S310Y, R678Q, D769H, or I767M mutations seem good candidates for anti-HER2 therapy as they show favorable outcomes and a good response to current pharmacological treatments. Carrying the L755S or D769Y mutation could also confer benefits when receiving neratinib or afatinib. By contrast, patients with mutations L755S, V842I, K753I, or D769Y do not seem to benefit from trastuzumab. Resistance to lapatinib has been reported in patients with L755S, V842I, and K753I. These data suggest that exploring HER2 SNPs in each patient could help individualize anti-HER2 therapies. Advances in our understanding of the genetics of the HER2 gene and its relations with the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatments are needed to improve the outcomes of patients with this aggressive breast cancer.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that treatment regimens for EGFR e20ins‐positive patients were highly diverse in terms of insertion patterns and co‐occurring mutations and these EGFRe20ins variants showed different clinical responses to various EGFR TKIs, suggesting the clinical importance of selecting proper EG FR TKI treatment based on the specific EGFR E20ins type.
TL;DR: awareness of all possible cardiovascular complications in NSCLC encourages vigilance in early diagnostics and treatment, and Cytotoxic agents and anti-VEGF inhibitors mainly cause vascular complications, including venous or arterial TE.
Abstract: Cardiovascular diseases may determine therapy outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The evidence for how iatrogenic cardiovascular complications contribute to ceasing anticancer treatment, decreasing the quality of life or even premature death, is unclear. Older patients and smokers are at risk of atherosclerosis and arterial thromboembolic events (TE), such as myocardial infarction or stroke. Venous TE can be observed in up to 15% of NSCLC patients, but the risk increases three to five times in ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase)-rearranged NSCLC. ALK inhibitors are associated with electrophysiological disorders. Cytotoxic agents and anti-VEGF inhibitors mainly cause vascular complications, including venous or arterial TE. Cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias seem to be less frequent. Chemotherapy is often administered in two-drug regimens. Clinical events can be triggered by different mechanisms. Among epidermal growth factor inhibitors, erlotinib and gefitinib can lead to coronary artery events; however, afatinib and osimertinib can be associated with the development of heart failure. During anti-PD1/anti-PDL1 therapy, myocarditis is possible, which must be differentiated from acute coronary syndrome and heart failure. Awareness of all possible cardiovascular complications in NSCLC encourages vigilance in early diagnostics and treatment.
TL;DR: Through a series of further drug screening assays and two-drug combination testing, it is identified that the combination of afatinib and YM155 is synergistically cytotoxic across multiple models of basal-like TNBC and reduces PDX mammary tumor growth in vivo.
Abstract: Compared with other breast cancer subtypes, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with relatively poor outcomes due to its metastatic propensity, frequent failure to respond to chemotherapy, and lack of alternative, targeted treatment options, despite decades of major research efforts. Our studies sought to identify promising targeted therapeutic candidates for TNBC through in vitro screening of 1,363 drugs in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Using this approach, we generated a dataset that can be used to assess and compare responses of various breast cancer PDXs to many different drugs. Through a series of further drug screening assays and two-drug combination testing, we identified that the combination of afatinib (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor) and YM155 (inhibitor of baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 (BIRC5; survivin) expression) is synergistically cytotoxic across multiple models of basal-like TNBC and reduces PDX mammary tumor growth in vivo. We found that YM155 reduces EGFR expression in TNBC cells, shedding light on its potential mechanism of synergism with afatinib. Both EGFR and BIRC5 are highly expressed in basal-like PDXs, cell lines, and patients, and high expression of both genes reduces metastasis-free survival, suggesting that co-targeting of these proteins holds promise for potential clinical success in TNBC.
TL;DR: The antitumor activity of newly synthesised triazolophthalazines (L-45 analogues) 10-32 was evaluated in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HePG-2), breast cancer (MCF-7), prostate cancer (PC3), and colorectal carcinomas (HCT-116) cells.
TL;DR: Osimertinib has a better effectiveness compared to all other TKIs, however, at a Dutch threshold of €80,000/QALY, osimertinIB appears not to be cost-effective.
Abstract: Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of first-line gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the relative efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. To assess the cost-effectiveness of these treatments, a Markov model was developed from Dutch societal perspective. The model was based on the clinical studies included in the NMA. Incremental costs per life-year (LY) and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were estimated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Results: Total discounted per patient costs for gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib were €65,889, €64,035, €69,418, and €131,997, and mean QALYs were 1.36, 1.39, 1.52, and 2.01 per patient, respectively. Erlotinib dominated gefitinib. Afatinib versus erlotinib yielded incremental costs of €27,058/LY and €41,504/QALY gained. Osimertinib resulted in €91,726/LY and €128,343/QALY gained compared to afatinib. PSA showed that gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib had 13%, 19%, 43%, and 26% probability to be cost-effective at a threshold of €80,000/QALY. A price reduction of osimertinib of 30% is required for osimertinib to be cost-effective at a threshold of €80,000/QALY. Conclusions: Osimertinib has a better effectiveness compared to all other TKIs. However, at a Dutch threshold of €80,000/QALY, osimertinib appears not to be cost-effective.
TL;DR: The results provided a potential strategy for afatinib-resistant NSCLC by targeting BLACAT1, a novel long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) that play a functional role as an oncogenic lncRNA and is associated with chemoresistance.
Abstract: Afatinib, a second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been approved as EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4 inhibitor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, acquired resistance to afatinib has been found in most EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. Bladder cancer associated transcript 1 (BLACAT1) is a novel long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) that play a functional role as an oncogenic lncRNA and is associated with chemoresistance. We aimed to identify the role of BLACAT1 in afatinib-resistant NSCLC and underlying mechanisms. Afatinib-resistant NSCLC cells were established. MTT assay, colony formation assay, apoptosis analysis, qRT-PCR and western blot analysis, immunohistochemistry, and in vivo study were carried out. BLACAT1 was up-regulated in afatinib-resistant NSCLC cells. Knockdown of BLACAT1 reversed the resistance of afatinib to NSCLC cells by modulating STAT3 signalling. The results provided a potential strategy for afatinib-resistant NSCLC by targeting BLACAT1.
TL;DR: First attempt to dissect m6A methylation affection on afatinib resistance in NSCLC is conducted, and brought inspiration for the study of epigenetic roles in drug resistance.
Abstract: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths. Afatinib is the first-line anti-cancer agent for treatment of NSCLC. However, unexpected resistance has been a major obstacle for its clinical efficacy. In this study, we dissected afatinib resistance from the perspective of N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) modification. First, we depicted the m6A modification profiles for the afatinib resistant and sensitive NSCLC cell lines (H1299 and A549). We found that the sum enrichment scores of the resistant cell line (H1299) was much higher than that of the sensitive cell line (A549). Next, we identified the functionally m6A-modified genes, which were the intersection of the differentially m6A methylated genes and the differentially expressed genes between H1299 and A549, as well as negative correlation between m6A modification levels and gene expression levels. In addition, functional enrichment analysis of the functionally m6A-modified genes indicated that m6A methylation might modify cell cycle to affect afatinib response. Furthermore, the functionally m6A-modified genes were over-represented in the putative drug resistance-associated genes and the FDA-approved drug targets, and had significantly higher average degree and clustering coefficient than other genes in protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. We also identified five network modules, which were all related to drug resistance functions. Finally, survival analysis demonstrated that m6A modification could affect prognosis of NSCLC patients. In conclusion, we conducted a first attempt to dissect m6A methylation affection on afatinib resistance in NSCLC, and brought inspiration for the study of epigenetic roles in drug resistance.
TL;DR: Accumulating evidences support potential benefits of molecularly targeted therapy in ALK-rearranged and other oncogene-driven NSCLC with LM and call for further studies to better define the underlying mechanism, to optimize the clinical management, and to improve patient outcomes.
Abstract: As a devastating complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is rising, largely due to overall longer survival of NSCLC, especially in patients with targetable molecular driver mutations. There is no clear consensus on the optimal management of LM. This review will cover recent advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of LM in NSCLC. In LM without oncogene drivers, systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal therapy, and radiation have modestly improved the clinical outcomes. Emerging data have also suggested encouraging activity of immunotherapy. At the same time, in LM with sensitizing EGFR mutations, osimertinib should be considered regardless of T790M status. Pulse erlotinib, afatinib, and newer agents with improved CNS penetration have also shown benefits. Moreover, accumulating evidences support potential benefits of molecularly targeted therapy in ALK-rearranged and other oncogene-driven NSCLC with LM. Future studies are warranted to better define the underlying mechanism, to optimize the clinical management, and to improve patient outcomes.
TL;DR: It was shown that patients who progressed from gefitinib treatment, bearing common EGFR mutations, and with longer EGFR-TKI treatment duration had increased incidence of T790M acquisition and, therefore, were suitable for subsequent osimertinIB treatment.
Abstract: In Taiwan, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib are served as first-line therapy for non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR sensitizing mutations. However, the majority of patients who initially respond to EGFR-TKIs, progress through acquiring EGFR T790M mutations (T790M), which is the most common resistant mechanism. Patients with T790M gain the opportunity of subsequent treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib. This study aimed to evaluate the association between prior EGFR-TKI therapy and incidence of acquired T790M resistance in lung adenocarcinoma patients who have progressed on first/second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy. This retrospective study included lung adenocarcinoma patients who had a radiographically-confirmed progressive disease under EGFR-TKI treatment and had re-biopsy samples for T790M testing from seven medical centers in Taiwan from June 2013 to December 2018. Patients harboring de novo T790M or using more than one EGFR-TKI were excluded. Of the 407 patients enrolled, the overall T790M acquisition rate was 52.8%. The patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib had a statistically significant difference in the T790M rates (59.9%, 45.5%, and 52.7%, respectively; p = 0.037) after disease progression. Patients with common baseline EGFR mutations (Del-19 and L858R) (p = 0.005) and longer treatment duration with EGFR-TKIs (p < 0.001) had higher chances of T790M acquisition. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further showed that patients with common baseline EGFR mutations, gefitinib (compared to erlotinib) administration, and longer treatment duration with EGFR-TKIs had higher T790M incidence. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acquired T790M between different re-biopsy tissue samples or complications. In conclusion, this study showed that patients who progressed from gefitinib treatment, bearing common EGFR mutations, and with longer EGFR-TKI treatment duration had increased incidence of T790M acquisition and, therefore, were suitable for subsequent osimertinib treatment.
TL;DR: The XDOTS platform can be used to evaluate therapies and therapeutic combinations ex vivo using PDX tumors and may accelerate the identification and clinical development of therapies for targets with no or few existing models and/or therapies.
Abstract: Purpose: Evaluating drug responses using primary patient-derived cells ex vivo represents a potentially rapid and efficient approach to screening for new treatment approaches. Here, we sought to identify neratinib combinations in HER2 mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient xenograft-derived organotypic spheroids (XDOTS) using a short-term ex vivo system. Experimental Design: We generated two HER2-mutant NSCLC PDX models [DFCI359 (HER2 exon19 755_757LREdelinsRP) and DFCI315 (HER2 exon20 V777_G778insGSP)] and used the PDX tumors to generate XDOTS. Tumor spheroids were grown in a microfluidic device and treated ex vivo with neratinib-based drug combinations. Live/dead quantification was performed by dual-labeling deconvolution fluorescence microscopy. The most efficacious ex vivo combination was subsequently validated in vivo using the DFCI359 and DFCI315 PDXs and a HER2YVMA genetically engineered mouse model. Results: Both neratinib and afatinib, but not gefitinib, induced cell death in DFCI359 XDOTS. The combinations of neratinib/trastuzumab and neratinib/temsirolimus enhanced the therapeutic benefit of neratinib alone in DFCI315 and DFCI359. The combination of neratinib and trastuzumab in vivo was more effective compared with single-agent neratinib or trastuzumab and was associated with more robust inhibition of HER2 and downstream signaling. Conclusions: The XDOTS platform can be used to evaluate therapies and therapeutic combinations ex vivo using PDX tumors. This approach may accelerate the identification and clinical development of therapies for targets with no or few existing models and/or therapies.
TL;DR: This work searched and validated two already approved drugs as new potential therapies for HNSCC in patients with Fanconi anemia and found the two best candidates, gefitinib and afatinib, EGFR inhibitors approved for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), displayed nontumor/tumor IC50 ratios of approximately 400 and approximately 100 times, respectively.
Abstract: Purpose: Fanconi anemia rare disease is characterized by bone marrow failure and a high predisposition to solid tumors, especially head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients with Fanconi anemia with HNSCC are not eligible for conventional therapies due to high toxicity in healthy cells, predominantly hematotoxicity, and the only treatment currently available is surgical resection. In this work, we searched and validated two already approved drugs as new potential therapies for HNSCC in patients with Fanconi anemia. Experimental Design: We conducted a high-content screening of 3,802 drugs in a FANCA-deficient tumor cell line to identify nongenotoxic drugs with cytotoxic/cytostatic activity. The best candidates were further studied in vitro and in vivo for efficacy and safety. Results: Several FDA/European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved anticancer drugs showed cancer-specific lethality or cell growth inhibition in Fanconi anemia HNSCC cell lines. The two best candidates, gefitinib and afatinib, EGFR inhibitors approved for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), displayed nontumor/tumor IC50 ratios of approximately 400 and approximately 100 times, respectively. Neither gefitinib nor afatinib activated the Fanconi anemia signaling pathway or induced chromosomal fragility in Fanconi anemia cell lines. Importantly, both drugs inhibited tumor growth in xenograft experiments in immunodeficient mice using two Fanconi anemia patient–derived HNSCCs. Finally, in vivo toxicity studies in Fanca-deficient mice showed that administration of gefitinib or afatinib was well-tolerated, displayed manageable side effects, no toxicity to bone marrow progenitors, and did not alter any hematologic parameters. Conclusions: Our data present a complete preclinical analysis and promising therapeutic line of the first FDA/EMA-approved anticancer drugs exerting cancer-specific toxicity for HNSCC in patients with Fanconi anemia.
TL;DR: Although gefit inib, erlotinib, and afatinib showed a comparable TTP in patients receiving first-line therapy, the incidence of T790M differed among them, as demonstrated by the present study, which could have implications for the choice of second-line treatment.
TL;DR: Patients receiving afatinib had the worst lifetime psychometric scores, whereas the differences in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) were modest, and erlotinib appeared to be cost-effective.
Abstract: Introduction Comparison of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) would improve patients’ clinical benefits and save costs. Using real-world data, this study attempted to directly compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of first-line afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib. Methods During May 2011-December 2017, all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) visiting a tertiary center were invited to fill out the EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires and World Health Organization Quality of Life, brief version (WHOQOL-BREF), and received follow-ups for survival and direct medical costs. A total of 379 patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC under first-line TKIs were enrolled for analysis. After propensity score matching for the patients receiving afatinib (n = 48), erlotinib (n = 48), and gefitinib (n = 96), we conducted the study from the payers’ perspective with a lifelong time horizon. Results Patients receiving afatinib had the worst lifetime psychometric scores, whereas the differences in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) were modest. Considering 3 treatments together, afatinib was dominated by erlotinib. Erlotinib had an incremental cost-effectiveness of US$17,960/life year and US$12,782/QALY compared with gefitinib. Acceptability curves showed that erlotinib had 58.6% and 78.9% probabilities of being cost-effective given a threshold of 1 Taiwanese per capita GDP per life year and QALY, respectively. Conclusion Erlotinib appeared to be cost-effective. Lifetime psychometric scores may provide additional information for effectiveness evaluation.
TL;DR: Newer-generation EGFR-TKIs resulted in improvement in outcomes, with less toxic side effects and better tolerability, and better understanding of resistance mechanisms is needed.
TL;DR: The ability of EGFr TKIs to reverse the effects of EGF on calcium‐dependent chloride secretion could contribute to the diarrheal side effects of these agents, and their disruption of epithelial barrier dysfunction is likely also pathophysiologically significant.
Abstract: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFr TKIs) are first-line therapies for various cancers, and cause dose-limiting severe diarrhea in many patients. We hypothesized that diarrhea caused by EGFr TKIs might reflect actions on epithelial transport, barrier function, or both, which we tested using cell cultures including murine and human enteroid-derived monolayers (EDMs), analyzed using electrophysiological and other relevant methods. EGFr TKIs (such as afatinib, erlotinib, and osimertinib) reversed the acute inhibitory effect of EGF on chloride secretion induced by carbachol (CCh) across T84 human colonic epithelial cells, which correlated with the diarrhea-inducing effect of each agent clinically. EGFr TKIs also reduced transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), whereas co-treatment with CCh delayed the decrease in TEER compared with that of cells co-treated with EGF. Furthermore, afatinib and erlotinib prevented EGF- or CCh-induced EGFr phosphorylation. EGFr TKIs also suppressed phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk)1/2 in response to EGF, whereas they had weaker effects on CCh-induced Erk1/2 phosphorylation. In human EDMs, EGF potentiated ion transport induced by CCh, whereas afatinib reversed this effect. The ability of EGFr TKIs to reverse the effects of EGF on calcium-dependent chloride secretion could contribute to the diarrheal side effects of these agents, and their disruption of epithelial barrier dysfunction is likely also pathophysiologically significant. CCh-activated Erk1/2 phosphorylation was relatively insensitive to EGFr TKIs and delayed the deleterious effects of EGFr TKIs on barrier function. These findings confirm and extend those of other authors, and may be relevant to designing strategies to overcome the diarrheal side effects of EGFr TKIs.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that afatinib combined with dasatinib has potential clinical activity in TNBC but warrants further preclinical investigation.
Abstract: Background:Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited therapeutic options. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been shown to be over-express...
TL;DR: This study aimed to investigate the molecular and clinical patterns of HER2 mutations in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and compare the different outcomes between chemotherapy and HER2‐TKIs.
Abstract: Background HER2 mutation is found in 1%-2% of lung cancer patients. Studies comparing chemotherapy to HER2-TKIs are limited. This study aimed to investigate the molecular and clinical patterns of HER2 mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and compare the different outcomes between chemotherapy and HER2-TKIs. Methods Advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer patients with de novo HER2 mutations (N = 75) were included in this study. Molecular information, clinical features, and treatment outcomes were retrospectively collected from a web-based patient registry and hospital chart review. Results Between October 2012 and December 2018, 65 patients with in-frame insertion mutations, eight with point mutations and two with gene amplification were found. The most common subtypes of insertion mutations were A775_G776insYVMA, G776delinsVC, and V777_G778insGSP. HER2 mutated patients were mostly young-aged, females, never or light smokers, with adenocarcinoma. Chemotherapy achieved better outcomes than HER2-TKIs (median PFS: 5.5 vs. 3.7 months in the first-line setting and 4.2 vs. 2.0 months in the second-line setting, P = 0.001 and 0.031, respectively). In particular for the most common subtype, YVMA insertions, PFS was significantly longer in chemotherapy than HER2-TKIs both in the first-line (6.0 vs. 2.6 months, P = 0.008) and the second-line (4.2 vs. 2.6 months P Conclusions HER2 mutated lung cancer patients were younger, mostly females, never or light smokers, with histologically diagnosed adenocarcinomas. Compared with afatinib, chemotherapy might bring more benefit to HER2 mutated advanced lung cancer patients, especially the most common type of HER2 exon 20 insertions, A775_G776insYVMA subtype. Key points Chemotherapy achieved better outcomes than afatinib for Chinese HER2 mutated advanced NSCLC patients, especially for the most common subtype, YVMA insertions.