scispace - formally typeset
R

Ross L. Prentice

Researcher at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Publications -  407
Citations -  37908

Ross L. Prentice is an academic researcher from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Women's Health Initiative. The author has an hindex of 94, co-authored 407 publications receiving 33619 citations. Previous affiliations of Ross L. Prentice include Argonne National Laboratory & Radiation Effects Research Foundation.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Gene-environment interactions in cancer epidemiology: a National Cancer Institute Think Tank report.

TL;DR: The National Cancer Institute sponsored a "Gene-Environment Think Tank" on January 10-11, 2012 to facilitate discussions on the state of the science, the goals of G × E interaction studies in cancer epidemiology, and opportunities for developing novel study designs and analysis tools as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Arthritis Increases the Risk for Fractures---Results from the Women’s Health Initiative

Nicole C. Wright, +60 more
TL;DR: The increase in fracture risk confirms the importance of fracture prevention in patients with RA and OA, and report of arthritis was associated with increased risk for spine, hip, and any clinical fractures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Increased Plasma Levels of the APC-Interacting Protein MAPRE1, LRG1, and IGFBP2 Preceding a Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer in Women

TL;DR: In this article, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) cohort was used to determine quantitative differences in plasma proteins between subjects subsequently diagnosed with colorectal cancer and matched controls that remained cancer-free during the period of followup.
Journal ArticleDOI

Correcting "winner's curse" in odds ratios from genomewide association findings for major complex human diseases.

TL;DR: It is found the simple bias correction procedure allows one to estimate bias‐adjusted ORs that have substantial consistency with ORs from subsequent replication studies, and that corresponding selection‐adjusted CIs appear to help quantify the uncertainty of the findings.