Institution
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Education•New York, New York, United States•
About: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is a education organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 37488 authors who have published 76057 publications receiving 3704104 citations. The organization is also known as: Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Cancer, Health care, Transplantation
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: To control the pandemic of developmental neurotoxicity, a global prevention strategy is proposed and chemicals in existing use and all new chemicals must therefore be tested for developmental neurotoxicants is proposed.
Abstract: Neurodevelopmental disabilities, including autism, attention-defi cit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia, and other cognitive impairments, aff ect millions of children worldwide, and some diagnoses seem to be increasing in frequency. Industrial chemicals that injure the developing brain are among the known causes for this rise in prevalence. In 2006, we did a systematic review and identifi ed fi ve industrial chemicals as developmental neurotoxicants: lead, methylmercury, polychlorinated biphenyls, arsenic, and toluene. Since 2006, epidemiological studies have documented six additional developmental neurotoxicants—manganese, fl uoride, chlorpyrifos, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, and the polybrominated diphenyl ethers. We postulate that even more neurotoxicants remain undiscovered. To control the pandemic of developmental neurotoxicity, we propose a global prevention strategy. Untested chemicals should not be presumed to be safe to brain development, and chemicals in existing use and all new chemicals must therefore be tested for developmental neurotoxicity. To coordinate these eff orts and to accelerate translation of science into prevention, we propose the urgent formation of a new international clearinghouse.
1,303 citations
••
TL;DR: It is concluded that butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by regulating the assembly of tight junctions and this dynamic process is mediated by the activation of AMPK.
Abstract: Butyrate, one of the SCFA, promotes the development of the intestinal barrier. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the butyrate regulation of the intestinal barrier are unknown. To test the hypothesis that the effect of butyrate on the intestinal barrier is mediated by the regulation of the assembly of tight junctions involving the activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), we determined the effect of butyrate on the intestinal barrier by measuring the transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and inulin permeability in a Caco-2 cell monolayer model. We further used a calcium switch assay to study the assembly of epithelial tight junctions and determined the effect of butyrate on the assembly of epithelial tight junctions and AMPK activity. We demonstrated that the butyrate treatment increased AMPK activity and accelerated the assembly of tight junctions as shown by the reorganization of tight junction proteins, as well as the development of TER. AMPK activity was also upregulated by butyrate during calcium switch-induced tight junction assembly. Compound C, a specific AMPK inhibitor, inhibited the butyrate-induced activation of AMPK. The facilitating effect of butyrate on the increases in TER in standard culture media, as well as after calcium switch, was abolished by compound C. We conclude that butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by regulating the assembly of tight junctions. This dynamic process is mediated by the activation of AMPK. These results suggest an intriguing link between SCFA and the intracellular energy sensor for the development of the intestinal barrier.
1,297 citations
••
Broad Institute1, New York University2, Harvard University3, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai4, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center5, Washington University in St. Louis6, Karolinska Institutet7, Baylor College of Medicine8, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill9, Vanderbilt University10, National Institutes of Health11
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that proteogenomic analysis of breast cancer elucidates functional consequences of somatic mutations, narrows candidate nominations for driver genes within large deletions and amplified regions, and identifies therapeutic targets.
Abstract: Somatic mutations have been extensively characterized in breast cancer, but the effects of these genetic alterations on the proteomic landscape remain poorly understood. Here we describe quantitative mass-spectrometry-based proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of 105 genomically annotated breast cancers, of which 77 provided high-quality data. Integrated analyses provided insights into the somatic cancer genome including the consequences of chromosomal loss, such as the 5q deletion characteristic of basal-like breast cancer. Interrogation of the 5q trans-effects against the Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures, connected loss of CETN3 and SKP1 to elevated expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and SKP1 loss also to increased SRC tyrosine kinase. Global proteomic data confirmed a stromal-enriched group of proteins in addition to basal and luminal clusters, and pathway analysis of the phosphoproteome identified a G-protein-coupled receptor cluster that was not readily identified at the mRNA level. In addition to ERBB2, other amplicon-associated highly phosphorylated kinases were identified, including CDK12, PAK1, PTK2, RIPK2 and TLK2. We demonstrate that proteogenomic analysis of breast cancer elucidates the functional consequences of somatic mutations, narrows candidate nominations for driver genes within large deletions and amplified regions, and identifies therapeutic targets.
1,296 citations
••
Stanford University1, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai2, Indiana University3, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center4, Mayo Clinic5, National Institutes of Health6, University of Utah7, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center8, Johns Hopkins University9, NorthShore University HealthSystem10, University of Michigan11, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill12, University of Turku13, Translational Genomics Research Institute14, Wayne State University15, University of Paris16, Cancer Council Victoria17, University of Melbourne18, University of Ulm19, University of Southern California20, Karolinska Institutet21, Northwestern University22, McGill University23, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans24
TL;DR: This work developed REVEL (rare exome variant ensemble learner), an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants on the basis of individual tools: MutPred, FATHMM, VEST, PolyPhen, SIFT, PROVEAN, MutationAssessor, LRT, GERP, SiPhy, phyloP, and phastCons.
Abstract: The vast majority of coding variants are rare, and assessment of the contribution of rare variants to complex traits is hampered by low statistical power and limited functional data. Improved methods for predicting the pathogenicity of rare coding variants are needed to facilitate the discovery of disease variants from exome sequencing studies. We developed REVEL (rare exome variant ensemble learner), an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants on the basis of individual tools: MutPred, FATHMM, VEST, PolyPhen, SIFT, PROVEAN, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster, LRT, GERP, SiPhy, phyloP, and phastCons. REVEL was trained with recently discovered pathogenic and rare neutral missense variants, excluding those previously used to train its constituent tools. When applied to two independent test sets, REVEL had the best overall performance (p −12 ) as compared to any individual tool and seven ensemble methods: MetaSVM, MetaLR, KGGSeq, Condel, CADD, DANN, and Eigen. Importantly, REVEL also had the best performance for distinguishing pathogenic from rare neutral variants with allele frequencies
1,295 citations
••
TL;DR: In this trial, LAA occlusion was noninferior to warfarin for ischemic stroke prevention or SE >7 days' post-procedure in patients with NVAF who do not have an absolute contraindication to short-termwarfarin therapy.
1,290 citations
Authors
Showing all 37948 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Robert Langer | 281 | 2324 | 326306 |
Shizuo Akira | 261 | 1308 | 320561 |
Gordon H. Guyatt | 231 | 1620 | 228631 |
Eugene Braunwald | 230 | 1711 | 264576 |
Bruce S. McEwen | 215 | 1163 | 200638 |
Robert J. Lefkowitz | 214 | 860 | 147995 |
Peter Libby | 211 | 932 | 182724 |
Mark J. Daly | 204 | 763 | 304452 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Paul G. Richardson | 183 | 1533 | 155912 |
Alan C. Evans | 183 | 866 | 134642 |
John C. Morris | 183 | 1441 | 168413 |
Paul M. Thompson | 183 | 2271 | 146736 |
Tadamitsu Kishimoto | 181 | 1067 | 130860 |
Bruce M. Psaty | 181 | 1205 | 138244 |