scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

St George's, University of London

EducationLondon, United Kingdom
About: St George's, University of London is a education organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 4953 authors who have published 11675 publications receiving 574153 citations. The organization is also known as: SGUL & St George's Hospital Medical School.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
31 Oct 2019-Cell
TL;DR: A consensus from the International Cell Senescence Association (ICSA) is presented, defining and discussing key cellular and molecular features of senescence and offering recommendations on how to use them as biomarkers.

1,220 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential. METHODS: To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved. RESULTS: There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses. CONCLUSIONS: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.

1,211 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the association between systolic or diastolic blood pressure and common variants in eight regions near the CYP17A1 (P = 7 × 10(-24)), CYP1A2(P = 1 × 10-23), FGF5 (P=1 × 10 -21), SH2B3(P= 3 × 10−18), MTHFR(MTHFR), c10orf107(P), ZNF652(ZNF652), PLCD3 (P,P = 5 × 10 −9),
Abstract: Elevated blood pressure is a common, heritable cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide. To date, identification of common genetic variants influencing blood pressure has proven challenging. We tested 2.5 million genotyped and imputed SNPs for association with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in 34,433 subjects of European ancestry from the Global BPgen consortium and followed up findings with direct genotyping (N ≤ 71,225 European ancestry, N ≤ 12,889 Indian Asian ancestry) and in silico comparison (CHARGE consortium, N = 29,136). We identified association between systolic or diastolic blood pressure and common variants in eight regions near the CYP17A1 (P = 7 × 10(-24)), CYP1A2 (P = 1 × 10(-23)), FGF5 (P = 1 × 10(-21)), SH2B3 (P = 3 × 10(-18)), MTHFR (P = 2 × 10(-13)), c10orf107 (P = 1 × 10(-9)), ZNF652 (P = 5 × 10(-9)) and PLCD3 (P = 1 × 10(-8)) genes. All variants associated with continuous blood pressure were associated with dichotomous hypertension. These associations between common variants and blood pressure and hypertension offer mechanistic insights into the regulation of blood pressure and may point to novel targets for interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease.

1,205 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Jun 2011-JAMA
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated whether intensive-dose statin therapy is associated with increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose stochastic insulin this paper.
Abstract: Context A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that statin therapy is associated with excess risk of developing diabetes mellitus. Objective To investigate whether intensive-dose statin therapy is associated with increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose statin therapy. Data Sources We identified relevant trials in a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 1, 1996, through March 31, 2011). Unpublished data were obtained from investigators. Study Selection We included randomized controlled end-point trials that compared intensive-dose statin therapy with moderate-dose statin therapy and included more than 1000 participants who were followed up for more than 1 year. Data Extraction Tabular data provided for each trial described baseline characteristics and numbers of participants developing diabetes and experiencing major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, coronary revascularization). We calculated trial-specific odds ratios (ORs) for new-onset diabetes and major cardiovascular events and combined these using random-effects model meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Results In 5 statin trials with 32 752 participants without diabetes at baseline, 2749 developed diabetes (1449 assigned intensive-dose therapy, 1300 assigned moderate-dose therapy, representing 2.0 additional cases in the intensive-dose group per 1000 patient-years) and 6684 experienced cardiovascular events (3134 and 3550, respectively, representing 6.5 fewer cases in the intensive-dose group per 1000 patient-years) over a weighted mean (SD) follow-up of 4.9 (1.9) years. Odds ratios were 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.22; I 2 = 0%) for new-onset diabetes and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94; I 2 = 74%) for cardiovascular events for participants receiving intensive therapy compared with moderate-dose therapy. As compared with moderate-dose statin therapy, the number needed to harm per year for intensive-dose statin therapy was 498 for new-onset diabetes while the number needed to treat per year for intensive-dose statin therapy was 155 for cardiovascular events. Conclusion In a pooled analysis of data from 5 statin trials, intensive-dose statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose statin therapy.

1,199 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A genome-wide association scan in individuals with Crohn's disease by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium detected strong association at four novel loci, and 37 SNPs from these and other loci were tested for association in an independent case-control sample.
Abstract: A genome-wide association scan in individuals with Crohn's disease by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium detected strong association at four novel loci. We tested 37 SNPs from these and other loci for association in an independent case-control sample. We obtained replication for the autophagy-inducing IRGM gene on chromosome 5q33.1 (replication P = 6.6 x 10(-4), combined P = 2.1 x 10(-10)) and for nine other loci, including NKX2-3, PTPN2 and gene deserts on chromosomes 1q and 5p13.

1,189 citations


Authors

Showing all 5006 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
JoAnn E. Manson2701819258509
Paul M. Ridker2331242245097
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Peer Bork206697245427
Grant W. Montgomery157926108118
Naveed Sattar1551326116368
Alan S. Verkman14677170434
David P. Strachan143472105256
Sekar Kathiresan14147998784
Nick C. Fox13974893036
Andrew Steptoe137100373431
Daniel I. Chasman13448472180
Joel N. Hirschhorn133431101061
Dan M. Roden13285967578
Hugh Watkins12852491317
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University Medical Center Groningen
30.3K papers, 967K citations

94% related

VU University Medical Center
22.9K papers, 1.1M citations

93% related

Leiden University Medical Center
38K papers, 1.6M citations

92% related

John Radcliffe Hospital
23.6K papers, 1.4M citations

92% related

Aarhus University Hospital
27.3K papers, 991.8K citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202313
202293
20211,153
2020999
2019873
2018789