scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure

Christopher Newton-Cheh, +362 more
- 01 Jun 2009 - 
- Vol. 41, Iss: 6, pp 666-676
TLDR
In this paper, the association between systolic or diastolic blood pressure and common variants in eight regions near the CYP17A1 (P = 7 × 10(-24)), CYP1A2(P = 1 × 10-23), FGF5 (P=1 × 10 -21), SH2B3(P= 3 × 10−18), MTHFR(MTHFR), c10orf107(P), ZNF652(ZNF652), PLCD3 (P,P = 5 × 10 −9),
Abstract
Elevated blood pressure is a common, heritable cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide. To date, identification of common genetic variants influencing blood pressure has proven challenging. We tested 2.5 million genotyped and imputed SNPs for association with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in 34,433 subjects of European ancestry from the Global BPgen consortium and followed up findings with direct genotyping (N ≤ 71,225 European ancestry, N ≤ 12,889 Indian Asian ancestry) and in silico comparison (CHARGE consortium, N = 29,136). We identified association between systolic or diastolic blood pressure and common variants in eight regions near the CYP17A1 (P = 7 × 10(-24)), CYP1A2 (P = 1 × 10(-23)), FGF5 (P = 1 × 10(-21)), SH2B3 (P = 3 × 10(-18)), MTHFR (P = 2 × 10(-13)), c10orf107 (P = 1 × 10(-9)), ZNF652 (P = 5 × 10(-9)) and PLCD3 (P = 1 × 10(-8)) genes. All variants associated with continuous blood pressure were associated with dichotomous hypertension. These associations between common variants and blood pressure and hypertension offer mechanistic insights into the regulation of blood pressure and may point to novel targets for interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Edinburgh Research Explorer
Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated
with blood pressure
Citation for published version:
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Newton-Cheh, C, Johnson, T, Gateva, V, Tobin, MD, Bochud, M,
Coin, L, Najjar, SS, Zhao, JH, Heath, SC, Eyheramendy, S, Papadakis, K, Voight, BF, Scott, LJ, Zhang, F,
Farrall, M, Tanaka, T, Wallace, C, Chambers, JC, Khaw, K-T, Nilsson, P, van der Harst, P, Polidoro, S,
Grobbee, DE, Onland-Moret, NC, Bots, ML, Wain, LV, Elliott, KS, Teumer, A, Luan, J, Lucas, G, Kuusisto,
J, Burton, PR, Hadley, D, McArdle, WL, Brown, M, Dominiczak, A, Newhouse, SJ, Samani, NJ, Webster, J,
Zeggini, E, Beckmann, JS, Bergmann, S, Lim, N, Song, K, Vollenweider, P, Waeber, G, Waterworth, DM,
Yuan, X, Groop, L & Orho-Melander, M 2009, 'Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci
associated with blood pressure', Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 666-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.361
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):
10.1038/ng.361
Link:
Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer
Document Version:
Peer reviewed version
Published In:
Nature Genetics
Publisher Rights Statement:
© 2009 Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.
General rights
Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s)
and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and
abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
Take down policy
The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer
content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please
contact openaccess@ed.ac.uk providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and
investigate your claim.
Download date: 10. Aug. 2022

Eight blood pressure loci identified by genome-wide association
study of 34,433 people of European ancestry
Christopher Newton-Cheh
1,2,3,94
, Toby Johnson
4,5,6,94
, Vesela Gateva
7,94
, Martin D
Tobin
8,94
, Murielle Bochud
5
, Lachlan Coin
9
, Samer S Najjar
10
, Jing Hua Zhao
11,12
, Simon C
Heath
13
, Susana Eyheramendy
14,15
, Konstantinos Papadakis
16
, Benjamin F Voight
1,3
,
Laura J Scott
7
, Feng Zhang
17
, Martin Farrall
18,19
, Toshiko Tanaka
20,21
, Chris Wallace
22,23
,
John C Chambers
9
, Kay-Tee Khaw
12,24
, Peter Nilsson
25
, Pim van der Harst
26
, Silvia
Polidoro
27
, Diederick E Grobbee
28
, N Charlotte Onland-Moret
28,29
, Michiel L Bots
28
, Louise
V Wain
8
, Katherine S Elliott
19
, Alexander Teumer
30
, Jian’an Luan
11
, Gavin Lucas
31
,
Correspondence to: Gonçalo Abecasis, Center for Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of
Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, Phone 734 763 4901, Fax 734 615 8322, Email:
goncalo@umich.edu, Mark Caulfield, Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London,
Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, Tel: 02078823402, Fax: 02078823408, Email: m.j.caulfield@qmul.ac.uk, Patricia
Munroe, Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M
6BQ, Tel: 02078823410, Fax: 02078823408, email: p.b.munroe@qmul.ac.uk, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Center for Genetic
Research, Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, CPZN 5.242, Boston, MA 02114,
Tel: +1 617 643 3615, Fax: 617 249 0127, Email: cnewtoncheh@chgr.mgh.harvard.edu.
94
These authors contributed equally.
95
These authors contributed equally.
Author contributions (alphabetical)
Project conception, design, management: ARYA: M.L.B., C.S.U.; BLSA: L.F.; B58C-T1DGC: D.P.S.; B58C-WTCCC: D.P.S.;
BRIGHT: M.Brown, M.C., J.M.C., A. Dominiczak, M.F., P.B.M., N.J.S., J.W.; CoLaus: J.S.B., S.Bergmann, M.Bochud, V.M. (PI),
P.Vollenweider (PI), G.W., D.M.W.; DGI: D.A., C.N.-C., L.G.; EPIC-Norfolk-GWAS: I.B., P.D., R.J.F.L., M.S.S., N.J.W., J.H.Z.
EPIC-Italy: S. Polidoro, P.Vineis. Fenland Study: R.J.F.L., N.G. F., N.J.W.; Finrisk97: L.P., V.S.; FUSION: R.N.B., M Boehnke,
F.S.C., K.L.M., L.J.S., T.V., J.T.; InCHIANTI: S. Bandinelli., L.F.; KORA: A. Döring, C.G., T.I., M.L., T.M., E.O., H.E.W. (PI);
LOLIPOP: J.C.C., P.E., J.S.K. (PI); MDC-CC: G.B., O.M.; MPP: G.B., O.M.; MIGen: D.A., R.E., S.K., J.M., O.M., C.J.O., V.S.,
S.M.S., D.S.S.; METSIM: J.K., M.L.; NFBC1966: P.E., M.-R.J.; PREVEND: P.E.d.J. (PI), G.N., W.H.v.G.; PROCARDIS: R.C.,
M.F., A.H., J.F.P., U.S., G.T., H.W.(PI); PROSPECT-EPIC. N.C.O.-M., Y.T.v.d.S.; SardiNIA: E.G.L., D.S.; SHIP: M.D., S.B.F.,
G.H., R.L., T.R., R.R., U.V., H.V.; SUVIMAX: P.M.; TwinsUK: P.D., T.D.S. (PI); UHP: D.E.G., M.E.N.
Phenotype collection, data management: ARYA: M.L.B., C.S.U.; B58C-T1DGC: D.H., W.L.M., D.P.S.; B58C-WTCCC: D.H.,
K.P., D.P.S.; BRIGHT: M. Brown, M.C., J.M.C., A.Dominiczak, M.F., P.B.M., N.J.S., J.W.; CoLaus: G.W.; DGI: L.G., O.M.;
EPIC-Italy: P. Vineis (PI); Finrisk97: P.J., M.P., V.S.;FUSION: J.T., T.V.; KORA: A. Doring, C.G., T.I.; MDC-CC: O.M.; MPP:
O.M., P.N.; MIGen: D.A., R.E., S.K., J.M., O.M., C.J.O., S.M.S., D.S.S., V.S.; NFBC1966: A.-L.H., M.-R.J., A.P.; PREVEND:
P.E.d.J., G.N., P.v.d.H., W.H.v.G.; PROCARDIS: R.C., A.H., U.S., G.T.; PROSPECT-EPIC. N.C.O.-M., Y.T.v.d.S.; SardiNIA:
S.S.N., A.S.; SHIP: M.D., R.L., R.R., H.V.; SUVIMAX: P.G., S.H.; TwinsUK: F.M.W.; UHP: D.E.G., M.E.N.
Genome-wide, validation genotyping: B58C-T1DGC: W.L.M.; B58C-WTCCC: W.L.M.; DGI: D.A., O.M., M.O.-M.; EPIC-
Norfolk-GWAS: I.B., P.D., N.J.W., J.H.Z.; EPIC-Norfolk-replication: S.A.B., K.-T.K., R.J.F.L., R.N.L., N.J.W.; EPIC-Italy:
G.M.; EPIC-Italy: A.A., A.d.G., S.G., V.R.; Finrisk97: G.J.C., C.N.-C.; FUSION: L.L.B., M.A.M.; KORA: T.I., T.M., E.O., A.P.;
MDC-CC: O.M., M.O.-M.; MPP: O.M., M.O.-M.; NFBC1966: P.E., N.B.F., M.-R.J., M.I.M., L.P. ; PREVEND: G.N., P.v.d.H. ;
W.H.v.G.; PROCARDIS: S.C.H., G.M.L., A.-C.S.; SardiNIA: M.U.; SHIP: F.E., G.H., A.T., U.V.; SUVIMAX: I.G.G., S.C.H.,
G.M.L., D.Z.; TwinsUK: P.D.
Data analysis: BLSA: T.T.; B58C-T1DGC: D.H., S.H., D.P.S.; B58C-WTCCC: P.R.B., D.H., K.P., D.P.S, M.D.T.; B58C-T1DGC:
D.H., S.H., D.P.S.; BRIGHT: S.J.N., C.W., E.Z.; CoLaus: S. Bergmann, M. Bochud, T.J., N.L., K.S., X.Y., DGI: O.M., C.N.-C.,
M.O.-M., B.F.V.; EPIC-Norfolk-GWAS: R.J.F.L., J.H.Z.; EPIC-Norfolk-replication: S.A.B., K.-T.K., R.J.F.L., R.N.L., N.J.W.;
EPIC-Italy: S.G., G.M., S. Panico, S. Polidoro, F.R., C.S., P. Vineis; Fenland Study: J.L.; Finrisk97: C.N.-C.; FUSION: A.U.J.,
L.J.S., H.M.S., C.J.W.; InCHIANTI: T.T.; KORA: S.E., C.G., M.L., E.O.; LOLIPOP: J.C.C.; MDC-CC: O.M., M.O.-M.; MPP:
O.M., M.O.-M.; MIGen: R.E., G.L., I.S., B.F.V.; NFBC1966: L.C., P.F.O.; PREVEND: H.S., P.v.d.H.; PROCARDIS: M.F., A.G.,
J.F.P.; SardiNIA: V.G., S.S., P.S.; SHIP: F.E., G.H., A.T., U.V.; SUVIMAX: S.C.H., T.J., P.M.; TwinsUK: N.S., F.Z., G.Z.
Analysis group. G.R.A., M.C., V.G., T.J., P.B.M., C.N.-C., M.D.T., L.V.W.
Writing group: G.R.A., M.C., P.E., V.G., T.J., P.B.M., C.N.-C., M.D.T.
COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT
The following authors declare the following potential conflicts of interest: N.L., V.M., K.S., D.M.W. and X.Y. are all full-time
employees at GlaxoSmithKline. P. Vollenweider and G.W received financial support from GlaxoSmithKline to assemble the CoLaus
study. No other authors reported conflicts of interest.
NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
Nat Genet
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 September 21.
Published in final edited form as:
Nat Genet
. 2009 June ; 41(6): 666–676. doi:10.1038/ng.361.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Johanna Kuusisto
32
, Paul R Burton
8
, David Hadley
16
, Wendy L McArdle
33
, Wellcome Trust
Case Control Consortium
34
, Morris Brown
35
, Anna Dominiczak
36
, Stephen J Newhouse
22
,
Nilesh J Samani
37
, John Webster
38
, Eleftheria Zeggini
19,39
, Jacques S Beckmann
4,40
, Sven
Bergmann
4,6
, Noha Lim
41
, Kijoung Song
41
, Peter Vollenweider
42
, Gerard Waeber
42
, Dawn
M Waterworth
41
, Xin Yuan
41
, Leif Groop
43,44
, Marju Orho-Melander
25
, Alessandra Allione
27
,
Alessandra Di Gregorio
27,45
, Simonetta Guarrera
27
, Salvatore Panico
46
, Fulvio Ricceri
27
,
Valeria Romanazzi
27,45
, Carlotta Sacerdote
47
, Paolo Vineis
9,27
, Inês Barroso
12,39
, Manjinder
S Sandhu
11,12,24
, Robert N Luben
12,24
, Gabriel J. Crawford
3
, Pekka Jousilahti
48
, Markus
Perola
48,49
, Michael Boehnke
7
, Lori L Bonnycastle
50
, Francis S Collins
50
, Anne U
Jackson
7
, Karen L Mohlke
51
, Heather M Stringham
7
, Timo T Valle
52
, Cristen J Willer
7
,
Richard N Bergman
53
, Mario A Morken
50
, Angela Döring
15
, Christian Gieger
15
, Thomas
Illig
15
, Thomas Meitinger
54,55
, Elin Org
56
, Arne Pfeufer
54
, H Erich Wichmann
15,57
, Sekar
Kathiresan
1,2,3
, Jaume Marrugat
31
, Christopher J O’Donnell
58,59
, Stephen M Schwartz
60,61
,
David S Siscovick
60,61
, Isaac Subirana
31,62
, Nelson B Freimer
63
, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen
64
,
Mark I McCarthy
19,65,66
, Paul F O’Reilly
9
, Leena Peltonen
39,49
, Anneli Pouta
64,67
, Paul E de
Jong
68
, Harold Snieder
69
, Wiek H van Gilst
26
, Robert Clarke
70
, Anuj Goel
18,19
, Anders
Hamsten
71
, John F Peden
18,19
, Udo Seedorf
72
, Ann-Christine Syvänen
73
, Giovanni
Tognoni
74
, Edward G Lakatta
10
, Serena Sanna
75
, Paul Scheet
76
, David Schlessinger
77
,
Angelo Scuteri
78
, Marcus Dörr
79
, Florian Ernst
30
, Stephan B Felix
79
, Georg Homuth
30
,
Roberto Lorbeer
80
, Thorsten Reffelmann
79
, Rainer Rettig
81
, Uwe Völker
30
, Pilar Galan
82
,
Ivo G Gut
13
, Serge Hercberg
82
, G Mark Lathrop
13
, Diana Zeleneka
13
, Panos Deloukas
12,39
,
Nicole Soranzo
17,39
, Frances M Williams
17
, Guangju Zhai
17
, Veikko Salomaa
48
, Markku
Laakso
32
, Roberto Elosua
31,62
, Nita G Forouhi
11
, Henry Völzke
80
, Cuno S Uiterwaal
28
,
Yvonne T van der Schouw
28
, Mattijs E Numans
28
, Giuseppe Matullo
27,45
, Gerjan Navis
68
,
Göran Berglund
25
, Sheila A Bingham
12,83
, Jaspal S Kooner
84
, Andrew D Paterson
85
, John
M Connell
36
, Stefania Bandinelli
86
, Luigi Ferrucci
21
, Hugh Watkins
18,19
, Tim D Spector
17
,
Jaakko Tuomilehto
52,87,88
, David Altshuler
1,3,89,90
, David P Strachan
16
, Maris Laan
56
, Pierre
Meneton
91
, Nicholas J Wareham
11,12
, Manuela Uda
75
, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin
9,67,92
, Vincent
Mooser
41
, Olle Melander
25
, Ruth JF Loos
11,12
, Paul Elliott
9,95
, Goncalo R Abecasis
93,95
,
Mark Caulfield
22,95
, and Patricia B Munroe
22,95
1
Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street,
Boston, MA 02114, USA
2
Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
3
Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad
Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
02142, USA
4
Department of Medical Genetics, University of Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne,
Switzerland
5
University Institute for Social and Preventative Medicine, Centre Hospitalier
Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
6
Swiss
Institute of Bioinformatics, Switzerland
7
Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical
Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
8
Departments of Health Sciences &
Genetics, Adrian Building, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH
9
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus,
Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK
10
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Intramural
Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland,
USA 21224
11
MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital,
Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
12
Cambridge - Genetics of Energy Metabolism (GEM) Consortium,
Cambridge, UK
13
Centre National de Génotypage, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, CP 5721, 91 057
Evry Cedex, France
14
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Facultad
de Matematicas, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile, 7820436
15
Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz
Zentrum München, German Research Centre for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg,
Germany
16
Division of Community Health Sciences, St George’s, University of London, London
SW17 0RE, UK
17
Dept of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London,
Newton-Cheh et al.
Page 2
Nat Genet
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 September 21.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript

London SE1 7EH
18
Dept. Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford
19
The Wellcome Trust
Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
20
Medstar Research
Institute, 3001 S. Hanover Street, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA
21
Clinical Research Branch,
National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, 21250 USA
22
Clinical Pharmacology and The
Genome Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine
and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ
23
JDRF/WT Diabetes and
Inflammation Laboratory, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research University of Cambridge,
Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Addenbrooke’s Hospital Cambridge, CB2 0XY
24
Department of
Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
CB2 2SR, UK
25
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital,
SE-20502 Malmö, Sweden
26
Department of Cardiology University Medical Center Groningen,
University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
27
ISI Foundation
(Institute for Scientific Interchange), Villa Gualino, Torino, 10133, Italy
28
Julius Center for Health
Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508
GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
29
Complex Genetics Section, Department of Medical Genetics -
DBG, University Medical Center Utrecht, STR 2.2112, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The
Netherlands
30
Interfaculty Institute for Genetics and Functional Genomics, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-
University Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
31
Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Genetics,
Institut Municipal d’Investigació Mèdica, Barcelona, Spain
32
Department of Medicine University of
Kuopio 70210 Kuopio, Finland
33
ALSPAC Laboratory, Department of Social Medicine, University
of Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
34
A full list of authors is provided in the supplementary methods online
35
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
CB2 2QQ
36
BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow,
UK G12 8TA
37
Dept of Cardiovascular Science, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby
Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK
38
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
39
Wellcome Trust
Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
40
Service of Medical Genetics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, 1011,
Switzerland
41
Genetics Division, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA
42
Department of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) 1011
Lausanne, Switzerland
43
Department of Clinical Sciences, Diabetes and Endocrinology
Research Unit, University Hospital, Malmö
44
Lund University, Malmö S-205 02, Sweden
45
Department of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry, University of Torino, Torino, 10126, Italy
46
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University, Naples, 80100, Italy
47
Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Turin and Centre for Cancer Epidemiology and
Prevention (CPO Piemonte), Turin, 10126, Italy
48
National Institute for Welfare and Health P.O.
Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland
49
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of
Helsinki and National Public Health Institute
50
Genome Technology Branch, National Human
Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
51
Department of Genetics, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
52
Diabetes Unit, Department of Epidemiology and
Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, 00300 Helsinki, Finland
53
Physiology and
Biophysics USC School of Medicine 1333 San Pablo Street, MMR 626 Los Angeles, California
90033
54
Institute of Human Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, German Research Centre
for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
55
Institute of Human Genetics,
Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
56
Institute of Molecular and Cell
Biology, University of Tartu, 51010 Tartu, Estonia
57
Ludwig Maximilians University, IBE, Chair of
Epidemiology, Munich
58
Cardiovascular Research Center and Cardiology Division,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
59
Framingham Heart
Study and National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Framingham, Massachusetts 01702, USA
60
Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98101 USA
61
Department of Epidemiology, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195 USA
62
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública,
Newton-Cheh et al.
Page 3
Nat Genet
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 September 21.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Barcelona, Spain
63
Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Gonda Center, Room 3506, 695
Charles E Young Drive South, Box 951761, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095
64
Department of
Clinical Sciences/Obstetrics and Gynecology, P.O. Box 5000 Fin-90014, University of Oulu,
Finland
65
Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford,
Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK
66
Oxford NIHR Biomedical
Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK OX3 7LJ
67
Department
of Child and Adolescent Health, National Public Health Institute (KTL), Aapistie 1, P.O. Box 310,
FIN-90101 Oulu, Finland
68
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine University Medical
Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
69
Unit of Genetic Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology University
Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The
Netherlands
70
Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), University of
Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
71
Atherosclerosis
Research Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University
Hospital Solna, Building L8:03, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
72
Leibniz-Institut für
Arterioskleroseforschung an der Universität Münster, Domagkstr. 3, D-48149, Münster, Germany
73
Molecular Medicine, Dept. Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
74
Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Via Nazionale, 66030 Santa Maria Imbaro (Chieti), Italy
75
Istituto
di Neurogenetica e Neurofarmacologia, CNR, Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy
76
Department of
Epidemiology, Univ. of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030
77
Laboratory
of Genetics, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of
Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21224
78
Unitá Operativa Geriatria, Istituto Nazionale Ricovero
e Cura per Anziani (INRCA) IRCCS, Rome, Italy
79
Department of Internal Medicine B, Ernst-
Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
80
Institute for Community
Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
81
Institute of
Physiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
82
U557 Institut
National de la Sante et de la Recherche Médicale, U1125 Institut National de la Recherche
Agronomique, Université Paris 13, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017 Bobigny Cedex, France
83
MRC
Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K
84
National
Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ
85
Program in Genetics and Genome
Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada, Dalla Lana School of Public Health,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5T 3M7
86
Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit, Azienda
Sanitaria Firenze (ASF), 50125, Florence, Italy
87
Department of Public Health, University of
Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
88
South Ostrobothnia Central Hospital, 60220 Seinäjoki,
Finland
89
Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts 02115, USA
90
Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,
Massachusetts 02114, USA
91
U872 Institut National de la Santét de la Recherche Médicale,
Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, 15 rue de l’Ecole de Medé0cine, 75270 Paris Cedex,
France
92
Institute of Health Sciences and Biocenter Oulu, Aapistie 1, FIN-90101, University of
Oulu, Finland
93
Center for Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 USA
Abstract
Elevated blood pressure is a common, heritable cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide. To
date, identification of common genetic variants influencing blood pressure has proven challenging.
We tested 2.5m genotyped and imputed SNPs for association with systolic and diastolic blood
pressure in 34,433 subjects of European ancestry from the Global BPgen consortium and followed
up findings with direct genotyping (N≤71,225 European ancestry, N=12,889 Indian Asian
ancestry) and
in silico
comparison (CHARGE consortium, N=29,136). We identified association
between systolic or diastolic blood pressure and common variants in 8 regions near the
CYP17A1
(
P
=7×10
−24
),
CYP1A2
(
P
=1×10
−23
),
FGF5
(
P
=1×10
−21
),
SH2B3
(
P
=3×10
−18
),
MTHFR
Newton-Cheh et al.
Page 4
Nat Genet
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 September 21.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans.

TL;DR: METAL provides a computationally efficient tool for meta-analysis of genome-wide association scans, which is a commonly used approach for improving power complex traits gene mapping studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types

TL;DR: This study presents a general framework for deciphering cis-regulatory connections and their roles in disease, and maps nine chromatin marks across nine cell types to systematically characterize regulatory elements, their cell-type specificities and their functional interactions.
Journal ArticleDOI

New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk

Josée Dupuis, +339 more
- 01 Feb 2010 - 
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that genetic studies of glycemic traits can identify type 2 diabetes risk loci, as well as loci containing gene variants that are associated with a modest elevation in glucose levels but are not associated with overt diabetes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk

Georg Ehret, +391 more
- 06 Oct 2011 - 
TL;DR: A genetic risk score based on 29 genome-wide significant variants was associated with hypertension, left ventricular wall thickness, stroke and coronary artery disease, but not kidney disease or kidney function, and these findings suggest potential novel therapeutic pathways for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Journal Article

New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (vol 42, pg 105, 2010)

Josée Dupuis, +303 more
- 01 May 2010 - 
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls

Paul Burton, +195 more
- 07 Jun 2007 - 
TL;DR: This study has demonstrated that careful use of a shared control group represents a safe and effective approach to GWA analyses of multiple disease phenotypes; generated a genome-wide genotype database for future studies of common diseases in the British population; and shown that, provided individuals with non-European ancestry are excluded, the extent of population stratification in theBritish population is generally modest.
Journal ArticleDOI

Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

TL;DR: Throughout middle and old age, usual blood pressure is strongly and directly related to vascular (and overall) mortality, without any evidence of a threshold down to at least 115/75 mm Hg.
Journal ArticleDOI

Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease

TL;DR: Substantial proportions of global disease burden are attributable to these major risks, to an extent greater than previously estimated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genomic control for association studies.

TL;DR: The performance of the genomic control method is quite good for plausible effects of liability genes, which bodes well for future genetic analyses of complex disorders.
Related Papers (5)

Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk

Georg Ehret, +391 more
- 06 Oct 2011 - 

Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls

Paul Burton, +195 more
- 07 Jun 2007 - 
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Eight blood pressure loci identified by genome-wide association study of 34,433 people of european ancestry" ?

The authors tested 2. 5m genotyped and imputed SNPs for association with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in 34,433 subjects of European ancestry from the Global BPgen consortium and followed up findings with direct genotyping ( N≤71,225 European ancestry, N=12,889 Indian Asian ancestry ) and in silico comparison ( CHARGE consortium, N=29,136 ). The authors therefore formed the Global Blood Pressure Genetics ( Global BPgen ) consortium and conducted meta-analysis of GWAS in 34,433 individuals of European ancestry with SBP and DBP measurements ( stage 1 ), followed by large-scale direct genotyping ( stage 2a ) and in silico ( stage 2b ) analyses ( Supplementary Figure 1 ). In their primary analysis ( stage 1 ), the authors examined individuals aged ≤70 years from 13 population-based studies and from control groups from 4 case-control studies ( Table 1 ). First, the authors selected 12 SNPs for follow-up genotyping in up to 71,225 individuals drawn from 13 cohorts of European ancestry and up to 12,889 individuals of Indian Asian ancestry from one cohort ( stage 2a, Table 1, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Table 2 ). Second, the authors performed a reciprocal exchange of association results for 10 independent signals each for SBP and DBP ( stage 2b, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Table 3 ) with colleagues from the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genome Epidemiology ( CHARGE ) blood pressure consortium who had recently meta-analyzed GWAS data for SBP and DBP in 29,136 individuals, independent of Global BPgen ( Table 1 ). A recent study found that the minor allele of Newton-Cheh et al. To explore this further, the authors looked up SNPs reported to be associated with T1D, celiac disease or myocardial infarction in the Global BPgen GWAS results and failed to find convincing association other than that for the SH2B3 missense SNP ( data not shown ). There was also no evidence of heterogeneity of effect across the samples examined for the eight SNPs ( Q-statistic P > 0. 05 ). While the authors describe here promising candidates at each locus identified, the causal gene could be any of the genes around the association signal in each locus ( Figure 1 ). Fine mapping and resequencing will be required to refine each association signal and to identify likely causal genetic variants which could be studied further in humans and in animal models. Some have advocated the study of pulse pressure ( SBP-DBP ), which increases with advancing age, and is correlated positively with SBP and negatively with DBP and also shows evidence of heritability. In their GWAS and follow up, the authors chose a priori to consider SBP and DBP as separate traits. A study designed to examine pulse pressure would be expected to show weaker ( if any ) association signals for the variants identified which all showed concordant effects on SBP and DBP. The authors did not perform a global GWAS of hypertension, which is expected to be underpowered to detect common variants of modest incremental effects on continuous blood pressure. For the eight SNPs that were genome-wide significant in continuous trait analysis, the authors examined the association with hypertension ( SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg or DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg or antihypertensive medication use ) compared to normotension ( SBP ≤ 120 mm Hg and DBP ≤ 85 mm Hg and no antihypertensive medication use ) in planned secondary analyses ( N range = 57,410 – 99,802 ). However, when the authors examined the hypertension association of each of the 8 SNPs genome-wide significantly associated with continuous SBP or DBP in just the stage 1 Global BPgen samples, 4 had 0. Thus, the study of continuous blood pressure allowed us to identify effects on risk of hypertension that would not have been readily discovered in a GWAS of hypertension drawn from these samples. Studies of familial aggregation suggest that there is also a substantial heritable component to blood pressure5. Detailed study of these genes has identified rare variants ( minor allele frequency [ MAF ] < 0. 1 % ) that impact blood pressure in the general population7 and evolving evidence suggests a potential role for common variation in some of the same genes8–10. However, meta-analysis of multiple studies with large total sample sizes has the potential to facilitate detection of variants with modest effects. The plots of test statistics against expectations under the null suggest an excess of extreme values ( cohort-specific and meta-analysis quantile-quantile plots are presented in Supplementary Figure 2 ). On meta-analysis of results from 34,433 individuals in stage 1, the authors observed 11 independent signals with P < 10−5 for SBP and 15 for DBP, with two results attaining P < 5×10−8, corresponding to genome-wide significance when adjusting for ~1m independent common variant tests estimated for samples of European ancestry ( Supplementary Figure 3 ) 15. A correlated SNP, rs762551 ( MAF = 0. 31, r2 = 0. 63, HapMap CEU ) in an intron of CYP1A2 has been found to influence caffeine metabolism and recently association has been suggested between myocardial infarction risk and the allele associated with slow caffeine metabolism30. The ARID3B gene is embryonic lethal when knocked out in mouse, with branchial arch and vascular developmental abnormalities31, but is potentially interesting because of the presence of ARID5B at the 10q21 locus described below. The authors observed no significant interaction between the eight genome-wide significant SNPs and gender ( P > 0. 01, Supplementary Table 5 ). The marked allele frequency differences between the European samples ( C allele frequency ~0. 35 ), the Indian Asian samples ( 0. 77 ) and HapMap YRI ( 1. 00 ) suggest distinct patterns of genetic variation at this locus across populations. A signal of positive selection has been suggested at the locus41 raising the potential functional importance of genetic variation in the region. 

Cytochrome P450 enzymes are responsible for drug and xenobiotic chemical metabolism in the liver and cellular metabolism of arachidonic acid derivatives29, some of which influence renal function, peripheral vascular tone and blood pressure. 

The observation that each SNP shows stronger association with one trait or the other (typically by 1–2 orders of magnitude) could reflect sampling variation, small effect sizes or true differences in the underlying biologic basis of one trait or the other. 

Increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), even within the normal range, have a continuous and graded impact on cardiovascular disease risk and are major contributors in half of all cardiovascular deaths 2,3. 

The first enzymatic action is a key step in the biosynthesis of mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids that affect sodium handling in the kidney and the second is involved in sex-steroid biosynthesis. 

A correlated SNP, rs762551 (MAF = 0.31, r2 = 0.63, HapMap CEU) in an intron of CYP1A2 has been found to influence caffeine metabolism and recently association has been suggested between myocardial infarction risk and the allele associated with slow caffeine metabolism30. 

Because a SNP at the 3q26 locus (MDS1) was selected in an interim analysis for direct genotyping, it was retained as the tenth locus for DBP even though its significance was reduced in the final stage 1 DBP GWAS analysis. 

The authors obtained results based on the analysis of the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genome Epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium, which comprises 29,136 samples from five population-based cohorts. 

In stage 2b, the authors selected 20 SNPs (10 SBP, 10 DBP) for in silico analysis in 29,136 individuals of European descent from the CHARGE consortium (stage 2b, see Supplementary Figure 1). 

In stage 2a, the authors selected 12 SNPs for genotyping in up to 71,225 individuals of European descent from 13 studies and up to 12,889 individuals of Indian Asian ancestry from one study. 

If a SNP in one top 10 list was also among the top 10 for the alternate blood pressure trait, the authors kept the locus with the lower p-value and went to the next locus on the list for the alternate blood pressure trait. 

The authors excluded individuals >70 years of age and individuals ascertained on case status for type 1 or 2 diabetes (DGI, FUSION), coronary artery disease (MIgen, PROCARDIS) or hypertension (BRIGHT), leaving 34,433 individuals for analysis (Table 1).