scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted ContentDOI

A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of convalescent plasma in adults with severe COVID-19

TLDR
In this paper, the clinical efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma among adults hospitalized with severe and critical COVID-19 was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial conducted from April 21st to November 27th, 2020.
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), data from randomized controlled trials that support its efficacy are limited. ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma among adults hospitalized with severe and critical COVID-19. DesignRandomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter, phase 2 trial conducted from April 21st to November 27th, 2020. SettingFive hospitals in New York City (NY, USA) and Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). ParticipantsHospitalized patients aged [≥]18 years with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, infiltrates on chest imaging and oxygen saturation [≤] 94% on room air or requirement for supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. InterventionParticipants were randomized 2:1 to a single transfusion of either 1 unit of convalescent or normal control plasma. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was clinical status at 28 days, measured using an ordinal scale and analyzed using a proportional odds model in the intention-to-treat population. ResultsOf 223 participants enrolled, 150 were randomized to receive convalescent plasma and 73 to normal control plasma. At 28 days, no significant improvement in clinical status was observed in participants randomized to convalescent plasma (with an odds ratio (OR) of a 1-point improvement in the scale: 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-2.68, p=0.180). However, 28-day mortality was significantly lower in participants randomized to convalescent plasma versus control plasma (19/150 [12.6%] versus 18/73 [24.6%], OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.91, p=0.034). The median titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody in infused convalescent plasma units was 1:160 (IQR 1:80-1:320). In a subset of nasopharyngeal swab samples (n=40) from Brazil that underwent genomic sequencing, no evidence of neutralization-escape mutants was detected. Serious adverse events occurred in 39/147 (27%) participants who received convalescent plasma and 26/72 (36%) participants who received control plasma. LimitationsSome participants did not receive high-titer convalescent plasma. ConclusionIn adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, use of convalescent plasma was not associated with significant improvement in 28 days clinical status. The significant reduction in mortality associated with convalescent plasma, however, may warrant further evaluation. RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04359810 FundingAmazon Foundation Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04359810

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

1
Title: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of convalescent plasma in adults with severe
COVID-19
Authors:
Max R. O’Donnell,
1,2,3
Beatriz Grinsztejn,
4
Matthew J. Cummings,
1,3
Jessica Justman,
5,6
Matthew R. Lamb,
2,5
Christina M. Eckhardt,
1
Neena M. Philip,
5
Ying Kuen Cheung,
7
Vinay
Gupta,
8
Esau João,
9
Jose Henrique Pilotto,
10
Maria Pia Diniz,
4
Sandra Wagner Cardoso,
4
Darryl
Abrams,
1
Kartik Rajagopalan,
1
Sarah Borden,
1
Allison Wolf,
1
Leon Claude Sidi,
9
Alexandre
Vizzoni,
4
Valdilea G. Veloso,
4
Zachary C. Bitan,
11
Dawn E. Scotto,
1
Benjamin J. Meyer,
12
Samuel D. Jacobson,
12
Alex Kantor,
1
Nischay Mishra,
2,3
Lokendra V. Chauhan,
3
Elizabeth
Stone,
11
Flavia Dei Zotti,
11
Francesca La Carpia,
11
Krystalyn E. Hudson,
11
Stephen A. Ferrera,
11
Joseph Schwartz,
11
Brie Stotler,
11
Wen-Hsuan Lin,
11
Sandeep Wontakal,
11
Beth Shaz,
13
Thomas
Briese,
2,3
Eldad A. Hod,
11
Steven L. Spitalnik,
11
Andrew Eisenberger,
14
W. Ian Lipkin
2,3,11
Affiliations:
1
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia
University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 622 West 168
th
Street, New York, NY,
10032, USA.
2
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York,
NY, USA; 722 West 168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
3
Center for Infection and Immunity, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New
York, NY, USA; 722 West 168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
4
Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Av. Brasil, 4365 - Manguinhos, Rio de
Janeiro , 21040-360, Brazil
5
ICAP, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; 722 West
168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253373doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.

2
6
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical
Center, New York, NY, USA; 622 West 168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
7
Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York,
NY, USA; 722 West 168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
8
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Box 351615, 3980 15th
Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
9
Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, R. Sacadura Cabral, 178 - Saúde, Rio de Janeiro,
20221-161, Brazil
10
Hospital Geral de Nova Iguaçu, Av. Henrique Duque Estrada Meyer, 953 - Posse, Nova
Iguaçu and Laboratório de Aids e Imunologia Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz – Fiocruz, Rio
de Janeiro, 21040-360, Brazil
11
Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622
West 168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
12
Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; 630 West
168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
13
New York Blood Center, 310 E 67th Street, New York, NY 10065, New York, NY, USA.
14
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving
Medical Center, 622 West 168
th
Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Corresponding Author: Max R. O’Donnell, MD, MPH, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and
Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168
th
St, PH 8E-
101, New York, NY, 10032, USA. Email: mo2130@columbia.edu; Telephone: +12123055794;
Fax: +12123058464
Abstract Word Count: 335
Manuscript total word count: 3,499
Running title: Trial of convalescent plasma in severe COVID-19
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253373doi: medRxiv preprint

3
Web Supplement: This article has an online supplement.
Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04359810
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253373doi: medRxiv preprint

4
Abstract
Background: Although convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat severe coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19), data from randomized controlled trials that support its efficacy are
limited.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma among adults
hospitalized with severe and critical COVID-19.
Design: Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter, phase 2 trial conducted from April
21
st
to November 27
th
, 2020.
Setting: Five hospitals in New York City (NY, USA) and Rio de Janeiro (Brazil).
Participants: Hospitalized patients aged
18 years with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19,
infiltrates on chest imaging and oxygen saturation
94% on room air or requirement for
supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane
oxygenation.
Intervention: Participants were randomized 2:1 to a single transfusion of either 1 unit of
convalescent or normal control plasma.
Measurements: The primary outcome was clinical status at 28 days, measured using an ordinal
scale and analyzed using a proportional odds model in the intention-to-treat population.
Results: Of 223 participants enrolled, 150 were randomized to receive convalescent plasma
and 73 to normal control plasma. At 28 days, no significant improvement in clinical status was
observed in participants randomized to convalescent plasma (with an odds ratio (OR) of a 1-
point improvement in the scale: 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-2.68, p=0.180).
However, 28-day mortality was significantly lower in participants randomized to convalescent
plasma versus control plasma (19/150 [12.6%] versus 18/73 [24.6%], OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-
0.91, p=0.034). The median titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody in infused
convalescent plasma units was 1:160 (IQR 1:80-1:320). In a subset of nasopharyngeal swab
samples (n=40) from Brazil that underwent genomic sequencing, no evidence of neutralization-
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253373doi: medRxiv preprint

5
escape mutants was detected. Serious adverse events occurred in 39/147 (27%) participants
who received convalescent plasma and 26/72 (36%) participants who received control plasma.
Limitations: Some participants did not receive high-titer convalescent plasma.
Conclusion: In adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, use of convalescent plasma was not
associated with significant improvement in 28 days clinical status. The significant reduction in
mortality associated with convalescent plasma, however, may warrant further evaluation.
Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04359810
Funding: Amazon Foundation
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted March 13, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253373doi: medRxiv preprint

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised controlled, open-label, platform trial

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and found no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the two groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.

TL;DR: To continually assess, as more evidence becomes available, whether convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin transfusion is effective and safe in treatment of people with COVID-19, a first living update of this review is published.
Journal ArticleDOI

A guide to immunotherapy for COVID-19

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors provide an overview of the evidence generated by major clinical trials of host-directed therapy for patients with COVID-19 and propose an algorithm to guide the use of immunotherapy strategies in the clinic.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma and Clinical Trials: Understanding Conflicting Outcomes

TL;DR: A review of 30 available RCTs demonstrated that signals of efficacy were more likely if the CCP neutralizing titer was higher than 160 and the time to randomization was less than 9 days, demonstrating confusion for both clinicians and patients about the appropriate use of CCP.
Journal ArticleDOI

Convalescent Plasma Therapy for COVID-19: A Graphical Mosaic of the Worldwide Evidence

TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analytical approach was used to pool daily survival data from all controlled studies that reported Kaplan-Meier survival plots, and a directionally consistent pattern among studies arising from multiple levels of the epistemic hierarchy was found that convalescent plasma transfusion was generally associated with greater patient survival.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

TL;DR: Hospitalised COVID-19 patients are frequently elderly subjects with co-morbidities receiving polypharmacy, all of which are known risk factors for d
Journal ArticleDOI

An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.

TL;DR: The outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has induced a considerable degree of fear, emotional stress and anxiety among individuals around the world.
Journal ArticleDOI

Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study.

TL;DR: A prospective observational cohort study on the epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in New York City and the relation between clinical risk factors, biomarkers, and in-hospital mortality is modelled using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (8)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

( which was not certified by peer review ) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. 

In the United States and Brazil, approximately 28.7 and 10.7 million cases of Covid-19 have been reported as of March 4th, 2021, respectively (1). 

Procedures Convalescent plasma used at all study sites was collected by the New York Blood Center from patients who had recovered from laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, provided informed consent, had a minimum anti-SARS-CoV-2 total IgG antibody titer of ≥1:400 by quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay against the spike protein (16), were at least 14 days asymptomatic following resolution of COVID-19, and had a negative PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 from a nasopharyngeal swab. 

Neutralization titer was determined with a SARS-CoV-2 viral neutralization assay which measured inhibition of virus growth after exposure to serial plasma dilutions using quantitative real-time reverseAll rights reserved. 

their strategy for qualification and collection of convalescent plasma was pragmatic, increasing generalizability of their findings to settings where quantification of neutralization activity is unavailable. 

ZCB, SLS, ES, FDZ, FLC, KEH, SAF, JS, BS, WHL, SW, and BS contributed to convalescent plasma collection, qualification, and release. 

In patients who received convalescent plasma, these events included worsening anemia, urticaria, skin rash, and transfusion-associated circulatory overload. 

; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253373doi: medRxiv preprint15characteristic of B.1.1.28 (AM-II), including V1176K in S, that is not known to impair neutralization. 

Trending Questions (1)
Can you donate plasma after testing positive for Covid?

In adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, use of convalescent plasma was not associated with significant improvement in 28 days clinical status.