Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate COVID-19 in India: An open-label parallel-arm phase II multicentre randomized controlled trial (PLACID Trial)
read more
Citations
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study
Immunity, endothelial injury and complement-induced coagulopathy in COVID-19.
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.
Significantly Decreased Mortality in a Large Cohort of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients Transfused Early with Convalescent Plasma Containing High-Titer Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Spike Protein IgG.
Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review.
References
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.
Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management.
Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma.
Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals.
Related Papers (5)
Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on Time to Clinical Improvement in Patients With Severe and Life-threatening COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report.
Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma.
Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients.
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. What have the authors stated for future works in "Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate covid-19 in india: an open-label parallel-arm phase ii multicentre randomized controlled trial (placid trial)" ?
Areas of future research could include effectiveness of CP among NAb naïve patients and the use of CP with high NAb titres. The Corresponding Author grants on behalf of all authors a worldwide licence to the Publishers and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media ( whether known now or created in the future ), to i ) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Contribution, ii ) translate the Contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or, abstracts of the Contribution, iii ) create any other derivative work ( s ) based on the Contribution, iv ) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the Contribution, v ) the inclusion of electronic links from the Contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located ; and, vi ) licence any third party to do any or all of the above. Whilst the observational studies suggested clinical benefits in recipients of convalescent plasma, the trials were stopped early, and they failed to ascertain any mortality benefit associated with convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19 patients. The effectiveness of convalescent plasma as a potential therapeutic modality for moderately ill COVID-19 patients is limited.
Q3. What are other mechanisms through which CP may exert its therapeutic effect in COVID-19 patients?
Other immune pathways such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement activation, or phagocytosis are putative mechanisms through which CP may exert its therapeutic effect in COVID-19 patients.
Q4. What was the protocol used to allocate participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive CP?
medRxiv preprintblock randomization strategy was used to allocate participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive either CP with the best standard of care (BSC) (intervention arm) or BSC alone (control arm).
Q5. What is the role of CP in the management of COVID-19?
CP is a passive immunization strategy which has been used on several occasions in the past century, inspiring clinical expectations that it could emerge as a potential therapy for a disease with no proven, effective interventions.
Q6. How did Wu et al determine the level of NAb in COVID-19 patients?
Wu et al documented that 30% of patients generated very low levels of NAb with titres correlating to increasing age and disease severity.
Q7. What did the investigators do to ensure the safety of the study?
After obtaining written, informed consent from an eligible patient, the site investigators screened the participant for recruitment, and called a member of the central trial coordinating team to receive the randomization sequence, ensuring concealment of allocation.
Q8. How many patients were randomized into the intervention or BSC arm?
A total of 1210 patients admitted across 39 trial sites were screened between 22nd April to 14th July 2020; 464 patients were randomized into intervention or CP +BSC arm (n=235) and control or BSC arm (n=229).
Q9. What was the majority of the patients who were encouraged to donate plasma?
While all COVID-19 survivors were encouraged to donate plasma, an overwhelming majority of the donors were only mildly sick, young survivors.
Q10. What is the role of CP in reducing mortality?
Since the publication of the first case series from China, multiple observational studies have been published, some on pre-print servers, highlighting the usefulness of CP in reducing mortality, hospital stay and viral load in COVID-19 patients.
Q11. how many participants received a unit of CP with detectable NAb?
Titres of NAb in transfused CP were available in 224 out of 235 participants in the intervention arm; 160 (71.4%) participants received at least one unit of CP with detectable NAb.
Q12. What was the definition of a patient who had received a diagnosis of COVID-19?
Eligible donors were either males or nulliparous females aged between 18-65 years, weighing over 50 kg, who had received a diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed with a positive RT-PCR test, suffered from symptomatic COVID-19 with at least fever and cough, which had completely resolved for a period of 28 consecutive days prior to donation or a period of 14 days prior to donation with two negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests from nasopharyngeal swabs collected 24 hours apart.
Q13. How many hospitals were involved in the PLACID trial?
; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.03.20187252doi: medRxiv preprintThe PLACID trial was an open-label, parallel-arm, phase II, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial conducted in 39 tertiary care hospitals across India.
Q14. What is the main difference between the PLACID trial and the other studies?
While this approach could have impacted the internal comparability across sites, the authors feel this lends the trial more generalizability, approximates real-world scenarios more closely and places their study closer to the pragmatic trials across the methodological spectrum of clinical trials.