scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Cross-Cultural Differences in a Global “Survey of World Views”:

Gerard Saucier, +66 more
- 27 Jan 2015 - 
- Vol. 46, Iss: 1, pp 53-70
TLDR
The authors found that the largest differences were not in those contents most frequently emphasized in cross-cultural psychology (e.g., values, social axioms, cultural tightness), but instead in contents involving religion, regularity-norm behaviors, family roles and living arrangements, and ethnonationalism.
Abstract
We know that there are cross-cultural differences in psychological variables, such as individualism/collectivism. But it has not been clear which of these variables show relatively the greatest differences. The Survey of World Views project operated from the premise that such issues are best addressed in a diverse sampling of countries representing a majority of the world's population, with a very large range of item-content. Data were collected online from 8,883 individuals (almost entirely college students based on local publicizing efforts) in 33 countries that constitute more than two third of the world's population, using items drawn from measures of nearly 50 variables. This report focuses on the broadest patterns evident in item data. The largest differences were not in those contents most frequently emphasized in cross-cultural psychology (e.g., values, social axioms, cultural tightness), but instead in contents involving religion, regularity-norm behaviors, family roles and living arrangements, and ethnonationalism. Content not often studied cross-culturally (e.g., materialism, Machiavellianism, isms dimensions, moral foundations) demonstrated moderate-magnitude differences. Further studies are needed to refine such conclusions, but indications are that cross-cultural psychology may benefit from casting a wider net in terms of the psychological variables of focus.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Do Student Samples Provide an Accurate Estimate of the General Public

TL;DR: The results indicate that generalizing from students to the general public can be problematic when personal and attitudinal variables are used, as students vary mostly randomly from the generalpublic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance:

TL;DR: This article presents a tool and a method for measuring the psychological and cultural distance between societies and creating a distance scale with any population as the point of comparison, and applied the fixation index (FST) to the World Values Survey of cultural beliefs and behaviors.
Journal Article

Families Across Cultures; A 30-Nation Psychological Study.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the relationship between the changes of the eco-cultural realities such as economic organization, political institutions, legal and educational systems and religion in 30 nations and the family, as expressed by family structure, demographies, family rules, functions, values and observed changes.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Questionnaire Big Six in 26 Nations: Developing Cross‐Culturally Applicable Big Six, Big Five and Big Two Inventories

TL;DR: The Big Five is a useful model of attributes now commonly used in cross-cultural research, but without the support of strong measurement invariance (MI) evidence as mentioned in this paper, and the Big Six has been proposed as a...
Journal ArticleDOI

Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior, across and within societies

TL;DR: This paper reviewed contemporary work on cultural factors affecting moral judgments and values, and those affecting moral behaviors, highlighting examples of within-societal cultural differences in morality, to show that these can be as substantial and important as cross-Societal differences.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A power primer.

TL;DR: A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is providedHere the sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests.
Book

The Interpretation of Cultures

TL;DR: The INTERPRETATION OF CULTURES CLIFFORD GEERTZ Books files are available at the online library of the University of Southern California as mentioned in this paper, where they can be used to find any kind of Books for reading.
Book

Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations

TL;DR: In this paper, values and culture data collection, treatment and validation power distance Uncertainty Avoidance Individualism and Collectivism Masculinity and Femininity Long versus Short-Term Orientation Cultures in Organizations Intercultural Encounters Using Culture Dimension Scores in Theory and Research
Book

The WEIRDest People in the World

TL;DR: A review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species – frequent outliers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

TL;DR: European Americans were found to be both more individualistic-valuing personal independence more-and less collectivistic-feeling duty to in-groups less-than others, and among Asians, only Chinese showed large effects, being both less individualistic and more collectivist.
Related Papers (5)

Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study

Michele J. Gelfand, +44 more
- 27 May 2011 -