scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Yon-Dschun Ko published in 2013"


Journal ArticleDOI
Danila Seidel1, Thomas Zander1, Lukas C. Heukamp2, Martin Peifer1, Marc Bos2, Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta2, Frauke Leenders2, Xin Lu2, Sascha Ansén2, Masyar Gardizi2, Chau Nguyen2, Chau Nguyen3, Johannes Berg2, Prudence A. Russell, Zoe Wainer4, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus2, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus5, Toni-Maree Rogers, Benjamin Solomon, William Pao6, Scott L. Carter7, Gad Getz7, D. Neil Hayes8, Matthew D. Wilkerson8, Erik Thunnissen9, William D. Travis10, Sven Perner11, Gavin M. Wright4, Elisabeth Brambilla, Reinhard Buettner2, Juergen Wolf2, Roman K. Thomas1, Franziska Gabler1, Ines Wilkening1, Christian Mueller2, Ilona Dahmen2, Roopika Menon11, Katharina Koenig2, Kerstin Albus2, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse2, Jana Fassunke2, Katja Schmitz2, Helen Kuenstlinger2, Michaela Angelika Kleine2, Elke Binot2, Silvia Querings1, Janine Altmueller2, Ingelore Boessmann2, Peter Nuemberg2, Peter M. Schneider2, Magdalena Bogus2, Alex Soltermann12, Holger Moch12, Odd Terje Brustugun13, Steinar Solberg13, Marius Lund-Iversen13, Åslaug Helland13, Thomas Muley14, Hans Hoffmann14, Philipp A. Schnabel14, Yuan Chen15, Harry J.M. Groen16, Wim Timens, Hannie Sietsma, Joachim H. Clement15, Walter Weder12, Joerg Saenger, Erich Stoelben, Corinna Ludwig, Walburga Engel-Riedel, Egbert F. Smit, Danille A. M. Heideman9, Peter J.F. Snijders9, Lucia Nogova2, Martin L. Sos1, Christian Mattonet2, Karin Toepelt2, Matthias Scheffler2, Eray Goekkurt17, Eray Goekkurt2, Rainer Kappes2, Stefan Krueger2, Kato Kambartel2, Dirk Behringer2, Wolfgang Schulte2, Wolfgang Galetke2, Winfried Randerath2, Matthias Heldwein2, Andreas Schlesinger2, Monika Serke2, Khosro Hekmat2, Konrad Frank2, Roland Schnell2, Marcel Reiser2, Ali-Nuri Huenerlituerkoglu2, Stephan Schmitz2, Lisa Meffert2, Yon-Dschun Ko2, Markus Litt-Lampe2, Ulrich Gerigk2, Rainer Fricke, Benjamin Besse, Christian Brambilla18, Sylvie Lantuejoul18, Philippe Lorimier, Denis Moro-Sibilot18, Federico Cappuzzo, C. Ligorio19, Stefania Damiani19, John K. Field20, Russell Hyde20, Pierre Validire, Philippe Girard, Lucia Anna Muscarella, Vito Michele Fazio, Michael Hallek2, Jean-Charles Soria21, Viktor Achter2, Ulrich Lang2 
TL;DR: Support is provided for broad implementation of genome-based diagnosis of lung cancer by demonstrating the correlation between lung tumor subtype and its predominant mutations, and the benefit of genetic testing and targeted therapy in these patients.
Abstract: We characterized genome alterations in 1255 clinically annotated lung tumors of all histological subgroups to identify genetically defined and clinically relevant subtypes. More than 55% of all cases had at least one oncogenic genome alteration potentially amenable to specific therapeutic intervention, including several personalized treatment approaches that are already in clinical evaluation. Marked differences in the pattern of genomic alterations existed between and within histological subtypes, thus challenging the original histomorphological diagnosis. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed many of these reassigned subtypes. The reassignment eliminated almost all cases of large cell carcinomas, some of which had therapeutically relevant alterations. Prospective testing of our genomics-based diagnostic algorithm in 5145 lung cancer patients enabled a genome-based diagnosis in 3863 (75%) patients, confirmed the feasibility of rational reassignments of large cell lung cancer, and led to improvement in overall survival in patients with EGFR-mutant or ALK-rearranged cancers. Thus, our findings provide support for broad implementation of genome-based diagnosis of lung cancer.

449 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Stefan Nickels1, Thérèse Truong2, Rebecca Hein3, Kristen N. Stevens4, Katharina Buck, Sabine Behrens1, Ursula Eilber1, Martina E. Schmidt1, Lothar Häberle5, Alina Vrieling6, Alina Vrieling1, Mia M. Gaudet7, Jonine D. Figueroa2, Nils Schoof8, Amanda B. Spurdle9, Anja Rudolph1, Peter A. Fasching10, Peter A. Fasching5, John L. Hopper11, Enes Makalic11, Daniel F. Schmidt11, Melissa C. Southey11, Matthias W. Beckmann5, Arif B. Ekici5, Olivia Fletcher, Lorna Gibson12, Isabel dos Santos Silva12, Julian Peto12, Manjeet K. Humphreys13, Jean S Wang13, Emilie Cordina-Duverger2, Florence Menegaux2, Børge G. Nordestgaard14, Stig E. Bojesen14, Charlotte Lanng14, Hoda Anton-Culver15, Argyrios Ziogas15, Leslie Bernstein16, Christina A. Clarke17, Christina A. Clarke18, Hermann Brenner1, Heiko Müller1, Volker Arndt1, Christa Stegmaier, Hiltrud Brauch19, Hiltrud Brauch20, Thomas Brüning21, Volker Harth22, Volker Harth23, Arto Mannermaa24, Vesa Kataja24, Veli-Matti Kosma24, Jaana M. Hartikainen24, Diether Lambrechts, Dominiek Smeets, Patrick Neven25, Robert Paridaens25, Dieter Flesch-Janys22, Nadia Obi22, Shan Wang-Gohrke26, Fergus J. Couch4, Janet E. Olson4, Celine M. Vachon4, Graham G. Giles27, Graham G. Giles11, Gianluca Severi27, Gianluca Severi11, Laura Baglietto11, Laura Baglietto27, Kenneth Offit28, Esther M. John17, Esther M. John18, Alexander Miron29, Irene L. Andrulis30, Julia A. Knight30, Gord Glendon30, Anna Marie Mulligan30, Stephen J. Chanock2, Jolanta Lissowska31, Jianjun Liu32, Angela Cox33, Helen Cramp33, Dan Connley33, Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian33, Alison M. Dunning13, Mitul Shah13, Amy Trentham-Dietz34, Polly A. Newcomb34, Polly A. Newcomb35, Linda J. Titus36, Kathleen Egan37, Elizabeth K. Cahoon2, Preetha Rajaraman2, Alice J. Sigurdson2, Michele M. Doody2, Pascal Guénel2, Paul D.P. Pharoah13, Marjanka K. Schmidt38, Per Hall2, Doug Easton13, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Roger L. Milne39, Jenny Chang-Claude1, H. B. Christina Justenhoven19, Yon-Dschun Ko, Christian Baisch, Hans-Peter Fischer40, Ute Hamann1, B. Pesch23, Sylvia Rabstein23, Anne Lotz23, Eija Myöhänen41, Helena Kemiläinen41, Heather Thorne41, Eveline Niedermayr41, David D.L. Bowtell9, David D.L. Bowtell41, Georgia Chenevix-Trench9, Georgia Chenevix-Trench41, Anna deFazio41, Anna deFazio9, Dorota M. Gertig9, Dorota M. Gertig41, A. Green9, A. Green41, Penny Webb41, Penny Webb9 
TL;DR: Evidence is provided that the risk of breast cancer associated with some common genetic variants may vary with environmental risk factors, as well as potential interactions between LSP1-rs3817198 and parity and CASP8 and alcohol consumption.
Abstract: Various common genetic susceptibility loci have been identified for breast cancer; however, it is unclear how they combine with lifestyle/environmental risk factors to influence risk. We undertook an international collaborative study to assess gene-environment interaction for risk of breast cancer. Data from 24 studies of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium were pooled. Using up to 34,793 invasive breast cancers and 41,099 controls, we examined whether the relative risks associated with 23 single nucleotide polymorphisms were modified by 10 established environmental risk factors (age at menarche, parity, breastfeeding, body mass index, height, oral contraceptive use, menopausal hormone therapy use, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, physical activity) in women of European ancestry. We used logistic regression models stratified by study and adjusted for age and performed likelihood ratio tests to assess gene-environment interactions. All statistical tests were two-sided. We replicated previously reported potential interactions between LSP1-rs3817198 and parity (P-interaction = 2.4 x 10(-6)) and between CASP8-rs17468277 and alcohol consumption (P-interaction = 3.1 x 10(-4)). Overall, the perallele odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for LSP1-rs3817198 was 1.08 (1.01-1.16) in nulliparous women and ranged from 1.03 (0.96-1.10) in parous women with one birth to 1.26 (1.16-1.37) in women with at least four births. For CASP8-rs17468277, the per-allele OR was 0.91 (0.85-0.98) in those with an alcohol intake of = 20 g/day. Additionally, interaction was found between 1p11.2-rs11249433 and ever being parous (P-interaction = 5.3 x 10(-5)), with a per-allele OR of 1.14 (1.11-1.17) in parous women and 0.98 (0.92-1.05) in nulliparous women. These data provide first strong evidence that the risk of breast cancer associated with some common genetic variants may vary with environmental risk factors.

152 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2013-BMJ Open
TL;DR: A needs-based approach helps to use available resources for adherence management efficiently and is associated with enhanced adherence of initially non-adherent patients, whereas initially adherent patients remain adherent for at least six cycles without specific support.
Abstract: Objective To develop and evaluate a multiprofessional modular medication management to assure adherence to capecitabine. Methods The study was conducted as a prospective, multicentred observational cohort study. All participants received pharmaceutical care consisting of oral and written information. Daily adherence was defined as percentage of days with correctly administered capecitabine doses and assessed using medication event monitoring. According to their daily adherence during the first cycle, patients were identified as initially non-adherent ( Results Seventy-three patients with various tumour entities were enrolled, 58 were initially adherent and 15 non-adherent. Median daily adherence of initially non-adherent patients increased from 85.7% to 97.6% during the observation period of six cycles. Throughout all cycles, median daily adherence of initially adherent patients was 100.0%. Daily adherence was not associated with sociodemographic and disease-related factors. No patient was non-persistent. Conclusions An early adherence screening effectively distinguishes between patients adhering and non-adhering to capecitabine. The provision of specific adherence support is associated with enhanced adherence of initially non-adherent patients, whereas initially adherent patients remain adherent for at least six cycles without specific support. Our needs-based approach helps to use available resources for adherence management efficiently.

46 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present study illustrates the contribution of multiple imputation of genotypes using public data repositories to standard genotyping laboratory and may facilitate the design of independent studies to validate the association between USPL1 rs7984952 and risk of Grade 3 breast tumors.
Abstract: Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins are covalently attached to target proteins to modify their function. SUMO conjugation participates in processes tightly linked to tumorigenesis. Recently USPL1 (ubiquitin-specific peptidase-like (1) was identified as a SUMO isopeptidase. We report here on the first exploratory study investigating the relationship between genetic variability in USPL1 and breast cancer. Three potentially functional nonsynonymous coding SNPs (rs3742303, rs17609459, rs7984952) were genotyped in 1,021 breast cancer cases and 1,015 controls from the population-based GENICA study. We took advantage of multiple genotype imputation based on HapMap and the 1000 Genomes Project data to refine the association screening in the investigated region. Public genetic databases were also used to investigate the relationship with USPL1 expression in lymphoblastoid cell lines and breast tissue. Women homozygous for the minor C allele of rs7984952 showed a lower risk of Grade 3 breast tumors compared to TT homozygotes (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.81). Case-only analyses confirmed the association between rs7984952 and tumor grade (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.93). Imputation results in a 238 kb region around rs7984952 based on HapMap and the 1000 Genomes Project data were similar. No imputed variant showed an association signal stronger than rs7984952. USPL1 expression in tumor breast tissue increased with the number of C alleles. The present study illustrates the contribution of multiple imputation of genotypes using public data repositories to standard genotyping laboratory. The provided information may facilitate the design of independent studies to validate the association between USPL1 rs7984952 and risk of Grade 3 breast tumors.

16 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The hypothesis that a HSD17B1-mediated decreased conversion of estrone to the more potent 17β-estradiol may reduce the estrogenic effects, thereby reducing the risk of developing breast cancer during long-term HRT use is supported.
Abstract: 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (HSD17B1) plays an important role in the biosynthesis of 17β-estradiol. The current study aimed at confirming the reduced risk of breast cancer in carriers of the non-synonymous HSD17B1_937_A>G (rs605059) polymorphism who used any hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for 10 years or longer. We performed an independent association study using four breast cancer case-control studies from Australia, Germany, and Sweden. In all, 5,777 cases and 8,189 age-matched controls of European descent were genotyped by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and TaqMan. Risk estimates were calculated by interaction analysis and main effect analysis adjusted for age and study. Main effect analyses for women using any HRT for 10 years or longer (1,428 cases versus 1,724 controls) revealed a protective effect of the HSD17B1_937_G allele on breast cancer risk (OR 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.73-0.99; p = 0.048). Thus, our previous finding of a protective effect of the HSD17B1_937_G allele on HRT-associated breast cancer risk has now been confirmed both in independent large patient cohorts and a comprehensive pooled analysis supporting the hypothesis that a HSD17B1-mediated decreased conversion of estrone to the more potent 17β-estradiol may reduce the estrogenic effects, thereby reducing the risk of developing breast cancer during long-term HRT use.

8 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The association of UGT1A6_19_GG with increased overall breast cancer risk is confirmed and the result from a well powered multi-stage study adds a novel candidate to the panel of validated breast cancer susceptibility loci.
Abstract: Validation of an association between the UGT1A6_19_T>G (rs6759892) polymorphism and overall breast cancer risk. A pilot study included two population-based case-control studies from Germany (MARIE-GENICA). An independent validation study comprised four independent breast cancer case-control studies from Finland (KBCP, OBCS), Germany (BBCC) and Sweden (SASBAC). The pooled analysis included 7,418 cases and 8,720 controls from all six studies. Participants were of European descent. Genotyping was done by MALDI-TOF MS and statistical analysis was performed by logistic regression adjusted for age and study. The increased overall breast cancer risk for women with the UGT1A6_19_GG genotype which was observed in the pilot study was confirmed in the set of four independent study collections (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.22; p = 0.001). The pooled study showed a similar effect (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.14; p = 0.001). We confirmed the association of UGT1A6_19_GG with increased overall breast cancer risk and conclude that our result from a well powered multi-stage study adds a novel candidate to the panel of validated breast cancer susceptibility loci.

8 citations