scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences

ArchiveRaleigh, North Carolina, United States
About: North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences is a archive organization based out in Raleigh, North Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cretaceous. The organization has 148 authors who have published 567 publications receiving 15204 citations. The organization is also known as: North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
12 Jun 2015-Science
TL;DR: It is suggested that a golden age of animal tracking science has begun and that the upcoming years will be a time of unprecedented exciting discoveries.
Abstract: BACKGROUND The movement of animals makes them fascinating but difficult study subjects. Animal movements underpin many biological phenomena, and understanding them is critical for applications in conservation, health, and food. Traditional approaches to animal tracking used field biologists wielding antennas to record a few dozen locations per animal, revealing only the most general patterns of animal space use. The advent of satellite tracking automated this process, but initially was limited to larger animals and increased the resolution of trajectories to only a few hundred locations per animal. The last few years have shown exponential improvement in tracking technology, leading to smaller tracking devices that can return millions of movement steps for ever-smaller animals. Finally, we have a tool that returns high-resolution data that reveal the detailed facets of animal movement and its many implications for biodiversity, animal ecology, behavior, and ecosystem function. ADVANCES Improved technology has brought animal tracking into the realm of big data, not only through high-resolution movement trajectories, but also through the addition of other on-animal sensors and the integration of remote sensing data about the environment through which these animals are moving. These new data are opening up a breadth of new scientific questions about ecology, evolution, and physiology and enable the use of animals as sensors of the environment. High–temporal resolution movement data also can document brief but important contacts between animals, creating new opportunities to study social networks, as well as interspecific interactions such as competition and predation. With solar panels keeping batteries charged, “lifetime” tracks can now be collected for some species, while broader approaches are aiming for species-wide sampling across multiple populations. Miniaturized tags also help reduce the impact of the devices on the study subjects, improving animal welfare and scientific results. As in other disciplines, the explosion of data volume and variety has created new challenges and opportunities for information management, integration, and analysis. In an exciting interdisciplinary push, biologists, statisticians, and computer scientists have begun to develop new tools that are already leading to new insights and scientific breakthroughs. OUTLOOK We suggest that a golden age of animal tracking science has begun and that the upcoming years will be a time of unprecedented exciting discoveries. Technology continues to improve our ability to track animals, with the promise of smaller tags collecting more data, less invasively, on a greater variety of animals. The big-data tracking studies that are just now being pioneered will become commonplace. If analytical developments can keep pace, the field will be able to develop real-time predictive models that integrate habitat preferences, movement abilities, sensory capacities, and animal memories into movement forecasts. The unique perspective offered by big-data animal tracking enables a new view of animals as naturally evolved sensors of environment, which we think has the potential to help us monitor the planet in completely new ways. A massive multi-individual monitoring program would allow a quorum sensing of our planet, using a variety of species to tap into the diversity of senses that have evolved across animal groups, providing new insight on our world through the sixth sense of the global animal collective. We expect that the field will soon reach a transformational point where these studies do more than inform us about particular species of animals, but allow the animals to teach us about the world.

1,096 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Oct 2015-Nature
TL;DR: The results of the divergence time analyses are congruent with the palaeontological record, supporting a major radiation of crown birds in the wake of the Cretaceous–Palaeogene (K–Pg) mass extinction.
Abstract: Although reconstruction of the phylogeny of living birds has progressed tremendously in the last decade, the evolutionary history of Neoaves--a clade that encompasses nearly all living bird species--remains the greatest unresolved challenge in dinosaur systematics. Here we investigate avian phylogeny with an unprecedented scale of data: >390,000 bases of genomic sequence data from each of 198 species of living birds, representing all major avian lineages, and two crocodilian outgroups. Sequence data were collected using anchored hybrid enrichment, yielding 259 nuclear loci with an average length of 1,523 bases for a total data set of over 7.8 × 10(7) bases. Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses yielded highly supported and nearly identical phylogenetic trees for all major avian lineages. Five major clades form successive sister groups to the rest of Neoaves: (1) a clade including nightjars, other caprimulgiforms, swifts, and hummingbirds; (2) a clade uniting cuckoos, bustards, and turacos with pigeons, mesites, and sandgrouse; (3) cranes and their relatives; (4) a comprehensive waterbird clade, including all diving, wading, and shorebirds; and (5) a comprehensive landbird clade with the enigmatic hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) as the sister group to the rest. Neither of the two main, recently proposed Neoavian clades--Columbea and Passerea--were supported as monophyletic. The results of our divergence time analyses are congruent with the palaeontological record, supporting a major radiation of crown birds in the wake of the Cretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) mass extinction.

1,094 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Marlee A. Tucker1, Katrin Böhning-Gaese1, William F. Fagan2, John M. Fryxell3, Bram Van Moorter, Susan C. Alberts4, Abdullahi H. Ali, Andrew M. Allen5, Andrew M. Allen6, Nina Attias7, Tal Avgar8, Hattie L. A. Bartlam-Brooks9, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar10, Jerrold L. Belant11, Alessandra Bertassoni12, Dean E. Beyer13, Laura R. Bidner14, Floris M. van Beest15, Stephen Blake16, Stephen Blake10, Niels Blaum17, Chloe Bracis1, Danielle D. Brown18, P J Nico de Bruyn19, Francesca Cagnacci20, Francesca Cagnacci21, Justin M. Calabrese2, Justin M. Calabrese22, Constança Camilo-Alves23, Simon Chamaillé-Jammes24, André Chiaradia25, André Chiaradia26, Sarah C. Davidson16, Sarah C. Davidson27, Todd E. Dennis28, Stephen DeStefano29, Duane R. Diefenbach30, Iain Douglas-Hamilton31, Iain Douglas-Hamilton32, Julian Fennessy, Claudia Fichtel33, Wolfgang Fiedler16, Christina Fischer34, Ilya R. Fischhoff35, Christen H. Fleming22, Christen H. Fleming2, Adam T. Ford36, Susanne A. Fritz1, Benedikt Gehr37, Jacob R. Goheen38, Eliezer Gurarie39, Eliezer Gurarie2, Mark Hebblewhite40, Marco Heurich41, Marco Heurich42, A. J. Mark Hewison43, Christian Hof, Edward Hurme2, Lynne A. Isbell14, René Janssen, Florian Jeltsch17, Petra Kaczensky44, Adam Kane45, Peter M. Kappeler33, Matthew J. Kauffman38, Roland Kays46, Roland Kays47, Duncan M. Kimuyu48, Flávia Koch49, Flávia Koch33, Bart Kranstauber37, Scott D. LaPoint50, Scott D. LaPoint16, Peter Leimgruber22, John D. C. Linnell, Pascual López-López51, A. Catherine Markham52, Jenny Mattisson, Emília Patrícia Medici53, Ugo Mellone54, Evelyn H. Merrill8, Guilherme Miranda de Mourão55, Ronaldo Gonçalves Morato, Nicolas Morellet43, Thomas A. Morrison56, Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz14, Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz57, Atle Mysterud58, Dejid Nandintsetseg1, Ran Nathan59, Aidin Niamir, John Odden, Robert B. O'Hara60, Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos7, Kirk A. Olson10, Bruce D. Patterson61, Rogério Cunha de Paula, Luca Pedrotti, Björn Reineking62, Björn Reineking63, Martin Rimmler, Tracey L. Rogers64, Christer Moe Rolandsen, Christopher S. Rosenberry65, Daniel I. Rubenstein66, Kamran Safi16, Kamran Safi67, Sonia Saïd, Nir Sapir68, Hall Sawyer, Niels Martin Schmidt15, Nuria Selva69, Agnieszka Sergiel69, Enkhtuvshin Shiilegdamba10, João P. Silva70, João P. Silva71, João P. Silva72, Navinder J. Singh5, Erling Johan Solberg, Orr Spiegel14, Olav Strand, Siva R. Sundaresan, Wiebke Ullmann17, Ulrich Voigt44, Jake Wall31, David W. Wattles29, Martin Wikelski67, Martin Wikelski16, Christopher C. Wilmers73, John W. Wilson74, George Wittemyer75, George Wittemyer31, Filip Zięba, Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica, Thomas Mueller1, Thomas Mueller22 
Goethe University Frankfurt1, University of Maryland, College Park2, University of Guelph3, Duke University4, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences5, Radboud University Nijmegen6, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul7, University of Alberta8, Royal Veterinary College9, Wildlife Conservation Society10, Mississippi State University11, Sao Paulo State University12, Michigan Department of Natural Resources13, University of California, Davis14, Aarhus University15, Max Planck Society16, University of Potsdam17, Middle Tennessee State University18, Mammal Research Institute19, Edmund Mach Foundation20, Harvard University21, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute22, University of Évora23, University of Montpellier24, Parks Victoria25, Monash University26, Ohio State University27, Fiji National University28, University of Massachusetts Amherst29, United States Geological Survey30, Save the Elephants31, University of Oxford32, German Primate Center33, Technische Universität München34, Institute of Ecosystem Studies35, University of British Columbia36, University of Zurich37, University of Wyoming38, University of Washington39, University of Montana40, Bavarian Forest National Park41, University of Freiburg42, University of Toulouse43, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna44, University College Cork45, North Carolina State University46, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences47, Karatina University48, University of Lethbridge49, Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory50, University of Valencia51, Stony Brook University52, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources53, University of Alicante54, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária55, University of Glasgow56, New York University57, University of Oslo58, Hebrew University of Jerusalem59, Norwegian University of Science and Technology60, Field Museum of Natural History61, University of Grenoble62, University of Bayreuth63, University of New South Wales64, Pennsylvania Game Commission65, Princeton University66, University of Konstanz67, University of Haifa68, Polish Academy of Sciences69, Instituto Superior de Agronomia70, University of Porto71, University of Lisbon72, University of California, Santa Cruz73, University of Pretoria74, Colorado State University75
26 Jan 2018-Science
TL;DR: Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, it is found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in area with a low human footprint.
Abstract: Animal movement is fundamental for ecosystem functioning and species survival, yet the effects of the anthropogenic footprint on animal movements have not been estimated across species. Using a unique GPS-tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, we found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one-half to one-third the extent of their movements in areas with a low human footprint. We attribute this reduction to behavioral changes of individual animals and to the exclusion of species with long-range movements from areas with higher human impact. Global loss of vagility alters a key ecological trait of animals that affects not only population persistence but also ecosystem processes such as predator-prey interactions, nutrient cycling, and disease transmission.

719 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A specimen-based protocol for selecting and documenting relevant fossils is presented and future directions for evaluating and utilizing phylogenetic and temporal data from the fossil record are discussed, to establish the best practices for justifying fossils used for the temporal calibration of molecular phylogenies.
Abstract: At this time, no abstract is available. SciVerse Scopus has content delivery agreements in place with each publisher and currently contains 30 million records with an abstract. An abstract may not be present due to incomplete data, as supplied by the publisher, or is still in the process of being indexed.

589 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This tool offers a level of detail in behavioral studies of free-ranging wild animals that has previously been impossible to achieve and, across scientific disciplines, it improves understanding of the role of behavioral mechanisms in ecological and evolutionary processes.
Abstract: Behavior is an important mechanism of evolution and it is paid for through energy expenditure. Nevertheless, field biologists can rarely observe animals for more than a fraction of their daily activities and attempts to quantify behavior for modeling ecological processes often exclude cryptic yet important behavioral events. Over the past few years, an explosion of research on remote monitoring of animal behavior using acceleration sensors has smashed the decades-old limits of observational studies. Animal-attached accelerometers measure the change in velocity of the body over time and can quantify fine-scale movements and body postures unlimited by visibility, observer bias, or the scale of space use. Pioneered more than a decade ago, application of accelerometers as a remote monitoring tool has recently surged thanks to the development of more accessible hardware and software. It has been applied to more than 120 species of animals to date. Accelerometer measurements are typically collected in three dimensions of movement at very high resolution (>10 Hz), and have so far been applied towards two main objectives. First, the patterns of accelerometer waveforms can be used to deduce specific behaviors through animal movement and body posture. Second, the variation in accelerometer waveform measurements has been shown to correlate with energy expenditure, opening up a suite of scientific questions in species notoriously difficult to observe in the wild. To date, studies of wild aquatic species outnumber wild terrestrial species and analyses of social behaviors are particularly few in number. Researchers of domestic and captive species also tend to report methodology more thoroughly than those studying species in the wild. There are substantial challenges to getting the most out of accelerometers, including validation, calibration, and the management and analysis of large quantities of data. In this review, we illustrate how accelerometers work, provide an overview of the ecological questions that have employed accelerometry, and highlight the emerging best practices for data acquisition and analysis. This tool offers a level of detail in behavioral studies of free-ranging wild animals that has previously been impossible to achieve and, across scientific disciplines, it improves understanding of the role of behavioral mechanisms in ecological and evolutionary processes.

406 citations


Authors

Showing all 151 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
John M. Asara8933339023
Roland Kays6019312748
Adrian Smith4413914122
Sterling J. Nesbitt401285370
David J. Kroll391024969
Julia A. Clarke381315328
Mary Higby Schweitzer33963156
Caren B. Cooper33786036
Elisabeth A. Wheeler31694284
Margaret D. Lowman30903507
Recep Avci301063278
Arthur E. Bogan291135130
Daniel T. Ksepka29752870
Bryan L. Stuart281082594
Alex Dornburg26714336
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
American Museum of Natural History
28.9K papers, 989.4K citations

91% related

National Museum of Natural History
10K papers, 358.5K citations

88% related

Natural History Museum
10.3K papers, 403K citations

86% related

Smithsonian Institution
10.3K papers, 415.7K citations

86% related

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
5.9K papers, 363.9K citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20224
202153
202065
201977
201868
201748