scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

FacilityPlainsboro Center, New Jersey, United States
About: Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory is a facility organization based out in Plainsboro Center, New Jersey, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Tokamak & Plasma. The organization has 2427 authors who have published 4475 publications receiving 106926 citations. The organization is also known as: PPPL.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A variety of methods have been proposed to provide continuous current, including methods that utilize particle beams or radio-frequency waves in any of several frequency regimes as mentioned in this paper, and experimentation in these techniques has now involved major tokamak facilities worldwide.
Abstract: The continuous operation of a tokamak fusion reactor requires, among other things, a means of providing continuously the toroidal current. Such operation is preferred to the conventional pulsed operation, where the plasma current is induced by a time-varying magnetic field. A variety of methods have been proposed to provide continuous current, including methods that utilize particle beams or radio-frequency waves in any of several frequency regimes. Currents as large as half a mega-amp have now been produced in the laboratory by such means, and experimentation in these techniques has now involved major tokamak facilities worldwide.

826 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The understanding and predictive capability of transport physics and plasma confinement is reviewed from the perspective of achieving reactor-scale burning plasmas in the ITER tokamak, for both core and edge plasma regions.
Abstract: The understanding and predictive capability of transport physics and plasma confinement is reviewed from the perspective of achieving reactor-scale burning plasmas in the ITER tokamak, for both core and edge plasma regions. Very considerable progress has been made in understanding, controlling and predicting tokamak transport across a wide variety of plasma conditions and regimes since the publication of the ITER Physics Basis (IPB) document (1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2137-2664). Major areas of progress considered here follow. (1) Substantial improvement in the physics content, capability and reliability of transport simulation and modelling codes, leading to much increased theory/experiment interaction as these codes are increasingly used to interpret and predict experiment. (2) Remarkable progress has been made in developing and understanding regimes of improved core confinement. Internal transport barriers and other forms of reduced core transport are now routinely obtained in all the leading tokamak devices worldwide. (3) The importance of controlling the H-mode edge pedestal is now generally recognized. Substantial progress has been made in extending high confinement H-mode operation to the Greenwald density, the demonstration of Type I ELM mitigation and control techniques and systematic explanation of Type I ELM stability. Theory-based predictive capability has also shown progress by integrating the plasma and neutral transport with MHD stability. (4) Transport projections to ITER are now made using three complementary approaches: empirical or global scaling, theory-based transport modelling and dimensionless parameter scaling (previously, empirical scaling was the dominant approach). For the ITER base case or the reference scenario of conventional ELMy H-mode operation, all three techniques predict that ITER will have sufficient confinement to meet its design target of Q = 10 operation, within similar uncertainties.

798 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, current sheets formed in magnetic reconnection events are found to be unstable to high-wavenumber perturbations, and a chain of plasmoid secondary islands is formed, whose number scales as S3∕8.
Abstract: Current sheets formed in magnetic reconnection events are found to be unstable to high-wavenumber perturbations. The instability is very fast: its maximum growth rate scales as S1∕4vA∕LCS, where LCS is the length of the sheet, vA the Alfven speed, and S the Lundquist number. As a result, a chain of plasmoids (secondary islands) is formed, whose number scales as S3∕8.

787 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, it is shown that this limit may be caused by a dramatic deterioration in core particle confinement occurring as the density limit boundary is approached, which can help explain the disruptions and Marfes that are associated with density limit.
Abstract: While the results of early work on the density limit in tokamaks from the ORMAK and DITE groups have been useful over the years, results from recent experiments and the requirements for extrapolation to future experiments have prompted a new look at this subject. There are many physical processes which limit the attainable densities in tokamak plasmas. These processes include: (1) radiation from low Z impurities, convection, charge exchange and other losses at the plasma edge; (2) radiation from low or high Z impurities in the plasma core; (3) deterioration of particle confinement in the plasma core; and (4) inadequate fuelling, often exacerbated by strong pumping by walls, limiters or divertors. Depending upon the circumstances, any of these processes may dominate and determine a density limit. In general, these mechanisms do not show the same dependence on plasma parameters. The multiplicity of processes leading to density limits with a variety of scaling has led to some confusion when comparing density limits for different machines. The authors attempt to sort out the various limits and to extend the scaling law for one of them to include the important effects of plasma shaping, i.e. ;e = k, where ne is the line average electron density (1020 m−3), κ is the plasma elongation and (MAm−2) is the average plasma current density, defined as the total current divided by the plasma cross-sectional area. In a sense, this is the most important density limit since, together with the q-limit, it yields the maximum operating density for a tokamak plasma. It is shown that this limit may be caused by a dramatic deterioration in core particle confinement occurring as the density limit boundary is approached. This mechanism can help explain the disruptions and Marfes that are associated with the density limit.

682 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 2017 plasmas roadmap as mentioned in this paper is the first update of a planned series of periodic updates of the Plasma Roadmap, which was published by the Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics in 2012.
Abstract: Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics published the first Plasma Roadmap in 2012 consisting of the individual perspectives of 16 leading experts in the various sub-fields of low temperature plasma science and technology. The 2017 Plasma Roadmap is the first update of a planned series of periodic updates of the Plasma Roadmap. The continuously growing interdisciplinary nature of the low temperature plasma field and its equally broad range of applications are making it increasingly difficult to identify major challenges that encompass all of the many sub-fields and applications. This intellectual diversity is ultimately a strength of the field. The current state of the art for the 19 sub-fields addressed in this roadmap demonstrates the enviable track record of the low temperature plasma field in the development of plasmas as an enabling technology for a vast range of technologies that underpin our modern society. At the same time, the many important scientific and technological challenges shared in this roadmap show that the path forward is not only scientifically rich but has the potential to make wide and far reaching contributions to many societal challenges.

677 citations


Authors

Showing all 2454 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David W. Johnson1602714140778
Kazuhiko Hara1411956107697
David R. Smith11088191683
Hantao Ji10579342035
David J. McComas9779438120
James R. Wilson89127137470
Bruce M. Jakosky7144120916
Patrick Diamond7160422522
Roger V. Yelle6929914469
Kwan-Liu Ma6552615442
Liu Chen6434316067
Gennady Shvets6444919516
David B. Graves6427815173
Brian LaBombard6338313721
Amitava Bhattacharjee6148114428
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
48.1K papers, 1.9M citations

79% related

Los Alamos National Laboratory
74.6K papers, 2.9M citations

75% related

Forschungszentrum Jülich
35.6K papers, 994.1K citations

74% related

Sandia National Laboratories
46.7K papers, 1.4M citations

74% related

Argonne National Laboratory
64.3K papers, 2.4M citations

74% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20232
202238
2021241
2020233
2019289
2018326