scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Royal Society for the Protection of Birds

NonprofitSandy, United Kingdom
About: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds is a nonprofit organization based out in Sandy, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Biodiversity. The organization has 670 authors who have published 1425 publications receiving 88006 citations. The organization is also known as: RSPB & Plumage League.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
21 Aug 2008-Ibis
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a GIS model of the potential range of American Mink Mustela vison, and assessed the benefits of current Mink control projects for terns in the Western Isles and the remainder of west Scotland using a population modelling approach.
Abstract: American Mink Mustela vison is a semi-aquatic predator that has invaded the west coast of Scotland and many of its associated islands. We developed a GIS model of their potential range based on their dispersal abilities and habitat use, which revealed that most islands in west Scotland are accessible to Mink, and that these host a large proportion of the region's Common Sterna hirundo and Arctic Terns S. paradisaea. Mink are predators on tern eggs and chicks, and statistical modelling of long-term productivity data demonstrated that unprotected sites within their range have an average productivity of 0.33 chicks per pair, whereas that at sites where Mink were trapped was 253% higher. We assessed the benefits of current Mink control projects for terns in the Western Isles and the remainder of west Scotland using a population modelling approach. This showed that both projects delivered considerable benefits for Common Terns, because a large proportion of their numbers were within the area of the control programmes and in sites that would be accessible to Mink if no control were in operation. For Arctic Terns, the benefits were less clear, as a larger proportion of their numbers were outside the control areas, and many of these were in sites isolated from, or unsuitable for, Mink. We discuss the implications of these findings for future strategic planning of Mink management in west Scotland.

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Agri-environment measures for cirl buntings have benefits for a range of taxa beyond the target species, and therefore, largely through reduction of management intensity and maintenance of land-use diversity, improve the overall biodiversity of the farmed landscape where they are present.
Abstract: Agri-environment scheme (AES) management has increased populations of cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in South Devon, England, and might be expected to provide benefits for other declining biodiversity, due to less intensive farm management. Fields managed under AES for cirl buntings (low-input spring barley or permanent pasture without inputs) were contrasted with control fields under conventional management (spring barley without management restrictions and winter cereals, or grazed without management restrictions) to identify such benefits for vascular plants, butterflies, bumblebees, carabid beetles, foliar invertebrates and bats. Activity-density and species richness of carabid beetles were both higher in AES spring barley fields than in control spring barley and winter cereal fields. Forb cover and abundance of butterflies and bumblebees were higher in AES spring barley fields than in winter cereals, but did not differ between AES and control spring barley. No difference was observed in plant species richness between any of the arable field types. Plant species richness and butterfly abundance were higher in AES pasture fields than in controls. Abundance, activity-density and/or species richness of other taxa did not differ between AES and control pastures. Benefits observed in AES spring barley fields arise from management specific to AES agreements, and also, we suggest, from the maintenance of spring-sown barley in the landscape. Benefits in AES pasture fields are ascribed to the absence of fertiliser and pesticide inputs, and reductions in stocking arising from this; there is also likely to have been some pre-selection for older pastures to be entered into AES management agreements. Agri-environment measures for cirl buntings have benefits for a range of taxa beyond the target species, and therefore, largely through reduction of management intensity and maintenance of land-use diversity, improve the overall biodiversity of the farmed landscape where they are present.

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Antica Culina, Frank Adriaensen1, Liam D. Bailey2, Malcolm D. Burgess3, Malcolm D. Burgess4, Anne Charmantier, Ella F. Cole5, Tapio Eeva6, Erik Matthysen1, Chloé R. Nater7, Ben C. Sheldon5, Bernt-Erik Sæther7, Stefan J. G. Vriend7, Zuzana Zajková, Peter Adamík, Lucy M. Aplin8, Lucy M. Aplin9, Elena Angulo10, Alexandr Artemyev11, Emilio Barba12, Sanja Barišić13, Eduardo J. Belda14, C. Can Bilgin15, Josefa Bleu, Christiaan Both16, Sandra Bouwhuis, Claire J. Branston17, Juli Broggi10, Terry Burke18, A.V. Bushuev19, Carlos Camacho20, Daniela Campobello21, David Canal, Alejandro Cantarero6, Samuel P. Caro, Maxime Cauchoix22, Alexis S. Chaine22, Mariusz Cichoń23, Davor Ćiković13, Camillo Cusimano, Caroline Deimel9, André A. Dhondt24, André A. Dhondt1, Niels Jeroen Dingemanse25, Blandine Doligez26, Blandine Doligez27, Davide M. Dominoni17, Claire Doutrelant, Szymon M. Drobniak23, Szymon M. Drobniak28, Anna Dubiec29, Marcel Eens1, Kjell Einar Erikstad30, Silvia Espín31, Damien R. Farine8, Damien R. Farine9, Jordi Figuerola10, Pınar Kavak Gülbeyaz15, Pınar Kavak Gülbeyaz32, Arnaud Grégoire, Ian R. Hartley33, Michaela Hau8, Michaela Hau9, Gergely Hegyi34, Sabine Marlene Hille35, Camilla A. Hinde36, Benedikt Holtmann25, T.A. Ilyina19, Caroline Isaksson20, Arne Iserbyt1, E.V. Ivankina19, Wojciech Kania29, Bart Kempenaers9, Anvar Kerimov19, Jan Komdeur16, Peter Korsten37, Miroslav Král, Miloš Krist, Marcel M. Lambrechts, Carlos E. Lara38, Agu Leivits, András Liker39, Jaanis Lodjak40, Marko Mägi40, Mark C. Mainwaring41, Raivo Mänd40, Bruno Massa, Sylvie Massemin, Jesús Martínez-Padilla10, Tomasz D. Mazgajski29, Adèle Mennerat42, Juan Moreno10, Alexia Mouchet25, Shinichi Nakagawa28, Jan-Åke Nilsson20, Johan Nilsson20, Ana Cláudia Norte43, Kees van Oers44, Markku Orell45, Jaime Potti10, John L. Quinn46, Denis Réale47, Tone Kristin Reiertsen30, Balázs Rosivall34, Andrew F. Russell4, Seppo Rytkönen45, Pablo Sánchez-Virosta31, Eduardo S. A. Santos48, Julia Schroeder49, Juan Carlos Senar, Gábor Seress39, Tore Slagsvold50, Marta Szulkin51, Céline Teplitsky, Vallo Tilgar40, Andrey Tolstoguzov11, János Török34, Mihai Valcu9, Emma Vatka52, Simon Verhulst16, Hannah Watson20, Teru Yuta53, Teru Yuta54, José M. Zamora-Marín31, Marcel E. Visser 
University of Antwerp1, Leibniz Association2, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds3, University of Exeter4, University of Oxford5, University of Turku6, Norwegian University of Science and Technology7, University of Konstanz8, Max Planck Society9, Spanish National Research Council10, Russian Academy of Sciences11, University of Valencia12, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts13, Polytechnic University of Valencia14, Middle East Technical University15, University of Groningen16, University of Glasgow17, University of Sheffield18, Moscow State University19, Lund University20, University of Palermo21, Centre national de la recherche scientifique22, Jagiellonian University23, Cornell University24, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich25, Uppsala University26, University of Lyon27, University of New South Wales28, Museum and Institute of Zoology29, Norwegian Institute for Air Research30, University of Murcia31, Hacettepe University32, Lancaster University33, Eötvös Loránd University34, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna35, Anglia Ruskin University36, Bielefeld University37, University of Otago38, University of Pannonia39, University of Tartu40, University of Montana41, University of Bergen42, University of Coimbra43, Wageningen University and Research Centre44, University of Oulu45, University College Cork46, Université du Québec à Montréal47, University of São Paulo48, Imperial College London49, University of Oslo50, University of Warsaw51, University of Helsinki52, Hokkaido University53, Yamashina Institute for Ornithology54
TL;DR: The SPI‐Birds Network and Database is created, a large‐scale initiative that connects data from, and researchers working on, studies of wild populations of individually recognizable (usually ringed) birds, and acts as a data hub and a catalogue of studied populations.
Abstract: The SPI-Birds have been supported by an NWO personal grant (grant number 016.Veni.181.054) to A.C., and a Research Council of Norway grant: 223257 (SFF-III) and 267511 (EVOCLIM).

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Few large changes in bird species' density were found, possibly because all habitats sampled were already at relatively low tree density – initial reductions from high tree density or near removal of all trees may cause larger changes in local bird densities.
Abstract: Capsule Two widespread censuses of already degraded woodland in the Sahel in Northern Nigeria separated by five years (2002 and 2007) showed relatively small further changes in tree and bird density. Aims To determine how change in tree density affects African and Palearctic migrant bird density in already degraded Sahelian woodland. Methods We compared differences in the number of bird species and their abundance with differences in the size and number of woody plants between two seasons separated by five years at 16 degraded woodland sites across 250 km east–west in northern Nigeria. Results Densities of large trees (>5 m) decreased, but densities of smaller trees and shrubs increased, partly as a consequence of growth and because larger trees have been preferentially removed or partly cut down; tree densities were, however, initially low. Of 37 common bird species, 16% had higher densities and 22% had lower densities, in the second study period. The density of Common Whitethroats, Northern Wheatears an...

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a framework for predicting the value of grazing systems to birds is proposed to guide the development of agri-environment measures to address farmland bird declines in pastoral areas.
Abstract: This review covers research linking foraging habitat quality for birds to livestock management in lowland farmland. Based on this research we propose a framework for predicting the value of grazing systems to birds. This predictive framework is needed to guide the development of agri-environment measures to address farmland bird declines in pastoral areas. We show that the exacting requirements of declining granivorous birds pose the greatest challenges, while the needs of soil invertebrate feeding species are more easily met.

17 citations


Authors

Showing all 672 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andrew Balmford9129033359
Rhys E. Green7828530428
Richard D. Gregory6116518428
Richard Evans4830610513
Rafael Mateo462387091
Deborah J. Pain46996717
Jeremy D. Wilson4512312587
Les G. Underhill452338217
Richard B. Bradbury421138062
Paul F. Donald4111711153
James W. Pearce-Higgins401445623
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann408416393
Juliet A. Vickery391168494
Mark A. Taggart381113703
Patrick W Thompson381446379
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Zoological Society of London
3.7K papers, 201.2K citations

85% related

The Nature Conservancy
3.7K papers, 202K citations

84% related

Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
3.2K papers, 161.6K citations

84% related

Wildlife Conservation Society
4.9K papers, 243.8K citations

83% related

Conservation International
1.5K papers, 167.2K citations

82% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20224
202190
202073
201993
201882
201770