scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Royal Society for the Protection of Birds published in 2021"


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2021
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a geographically explicit model of future agricultural land clearance based on observed historical changes, and combined the outputs with species-specific habitat preferences for 19,859 species of terrestrial vertebrates.
Abstract: The projected loss of millions of square kilometres of natural ecosystems to meet future demand for food, animal feed, fibre and bioenergy crops is likely to massively escalate threats to biodiversity. Reducing these threats requires a detailed knowledge of how and where they are likely to be most severe. We developed a geographically explicit model of future agricultural land clearance based on observed historical changes, and combined the outputs with species-specific habitat preferences for 19,859 species of terrestrial vertebrates. We project that 87.7% of these species will lose habitat to agricultural expansion by 2050, with 1,280 species projected to lose ≥25% of their habitat. Proactive policies targeting how, where, and what food is produced could reduce these threats, with a combination of approaches potentially preventing almost all these losses while contributing to healthier human diets. As international biodiversity targets are set to be updated in 2021, these results highlight the importance of proactive efforts to safeguard biodiversity by reducing demand for agricultural land.

72 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Cecilia Blundo1, Julieta Carilla1, Ricardo Grau1, Agustina Malizia1  +549 moreInstitutions (176)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show how a global community is responding to the challenges of tropical ecosystem research with diverse teams measuring forests tree-by-tree in thousands of long-term plots.

66 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Amanda E. Bates1, Richard B. Primack2, Brandy S. Biggar1, Tomas J. Bird3  +343 moreInstitutions (106)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report immediate impacts of changes in human activities on wildlife and environmental threats during the early lockdown months of 2020, based on 877 qualitative reports and 332 quantitative assessments from 89 different studies.

64 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A literature review of 109 papers studying 129 taxa finds that all five criteria that all need to be met to demonstrate that temperature-mediated trophic asynchrony poses a growing risk to consumers are not met.
Abstract: Climate warming has caused the seasonal timing of many components of ecological food chains to advance. In the context of trophic interactions, the match–mismatch hypothesis postulates that differential shifts can lead to phenological asynchrony with negative impacts for consumers. However, at present there has been no consistent analysis of the links between temperature change, phenological asynchrony and individual-to-population-level impacts across taxa, trophic levels and biomes at a global scale. Here, we propose five criteria that all need to be met to demonstrate that temperature-mediated trophic asynchrony poses a growing risk to consumers. We conduct a literature review of 109 papers studying 129 taxa, and find that all five criteria are assessed for only two taxa, with the majority of taxa only having one or two criteria assessed. Crucially, nearly every study was conducted in Europe or North America, and most studies were on terrestrial secondary consumers. We thus lack a robust evidence base from which to draw general conclusions about the risk that climate-mediated trophic asynchrony may pose to populations worldwide.

42 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Louise Mair1, Leon Bennun2, Thomas M. Brooks3, Thomas M. Brooks4, Thomas M. Brooks5, Stuart H. M. Butchart6, Stuart H. M. Butchart2, Friederike C. Bolam7, Friederike C. Bolam1, Neil D. Burgess7, Neil D. Burgess8, Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom, E. J. Milner-Gulland9, Michael R. Hoffmann10, Keping Ma11, Nicholas B.W. Macfarlane3, Domitilla C. Raimondo3, Ana S. L. Rodrigues12, Xiaoli Shen11, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg13, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg14, Craig Beatty15, Craig Beatty3, Carla Gómez-Creutzberg3, Alvaro Iribarrem13, Alvaro Iribarrem14, Meizani Irmadhiany, Eduardo Lacerda14, Eduardo Lacerda16, Bianca C. Mattos, Karmila Parakkasi, Marcelo F. Tognelli17, Elizabeth L. Bennett18, Catherine Bryan, Giulia Carbone3, Abhishek Chaudhary19, Maxime Eiselin3, Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca20, Russell Galt3, Arne Geschke21, Louise Glew15, Romie Goedicke3, Jonathan Green22, Richard D. Gregory23, Richard D. Gregory24, Samantha L. L. Hill7, David G. Hole17, Jonathan Hughes7, Jon Hutton, Marco P. W. Keijzer3, Laetitia M. Navarro25, Laetitia M. Navarro26, Eimear Nic Lughadha27, Andrew J. Plumptre2, Andrew J. Plumptre6, Philippe Puydarrieux3, Hugh P. Possingham28, Hugh P. Possingham29, Aleksandar Rankovic30, Eugenie Regan7, Eugenie Regan31, Carlo Rondinini32, Joshua D. Schneck3, Juha Siikamäki3, Cyriaque N. Sendashonga3, Gilles Seutin33, Sam Sinclair, Andrew Skowno34, Carolina A. Soto-Navarro7, Simon N. Stuart3, Helen J. Temple, Antoine Vallier, Francesca Verones35, Leonardo R. Viana17, James E. M. Watson29, James E. M. Watson18, Simeon Bezeng Bezeng36, Monika Böhm10, Ian J. Burfield6, Viola Clausnitzer, Colin Clubbe27, Neil A. Cox17, Jörg Freyhof37, Leah R. Gerber38, Craig Hilton-Taylor3, Richard K. B. Jenkins3, Ackbar Joolia3, Lucas Joppa39, Lian Pin Koh40, Thomas E. Lacher41, Penny F. Langhammer38, Barney Long, David Mallon42, Michela Pacifici32, Beth Polidoro38, Caroline M. Pollock3, Malin C. Rivers43, Nicolette S. Roach41, Jon Paul Rodríguez3, Jon Paul Rodríguez44, Jane Smart3, Bruce E. Young45, Frank Hawkins3, Philip J. K. McGowan1 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a species threat abatement and restoration (STAR) metric that is scalable across species, threats and geographies and quantifies the contributions that abating threats and restoring habitats in specific places offer towards reducing extinction risk.
Abstract: The Convention on Biological Diversity’s post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework will probably include a goal to stabilize and restore the status of species Its delivery would be facilitated by making the actions required to halt and reverse species loss spatially explicit Here, we develop a species threat abatement and restoration (STAR) metric that is scalable across species, threats and geographies STAR quantifies the contributions that abating threats and restoring habitats in specific places offer towards reducing extinction risk While every nation can contribute towards halting biodiversity loss, Indonesia, Colombia, Mexico, Madagascar and Brazil combined have stewardship over 31% of total STAR values for terrestrial amphibians, birds and mammals Among actions, sustainable crop production and forestry dominate, contributing 41% of total STAR values for these taxonomic groups Key Biodiversity Areas cover 9% of the terrestrial surface but capture 47% of STAR values STAR could support governmental and non-state actors in quantifying their contributions to meeting science-based species targets within the framework

38 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Tammy E. Davies1, Ana P. B. Carneiro1, Marguerite Tarzia1, Ewan D. Wakefield, Janos C. Hennicke2, Morten Frederiksen3, Erpur Snær Hansen, Bruna Campos, Carolina Hazin1, Ben Lascelles1, Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Hólmfríður Arnardóttir, Robert T. Barrett, Manuel Biscoito4, Loïc Bollache5, Thierry Boulinier6, Paulo Catry7, Filipe R. Ceia8, Olivier Chastel9, Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard, Marta Cruz-Flores10, Jóhannis Danielsen, Francis Daunt, Euan Dunn11, Carsten Egevang, Ana Isabel Fagundes, Annette L. Fayet12, Jérôme Fort9, Robert W. Furness13, Olivier Gilg5, Jacob González-Solís10, José Pedro Granadeiro14, David Grémillet9, David Grémillet15, Tim Guilford12, Sveinn Are Hanssen, Michael P. Harris, April Hedd, Nicholas Per Huffeldt3, Mark Jessopp16, Yann Kolbeinsson, Johannes Krietsch17, Johannes Krietsch18, Johannes Lang, Jannie F. Linnebjerg3, Svein-Håkon Lorentsen, Jeremy Madeiros, Ellen Magnusdottir19, Mark L. Mallory20, Laura McFarlane Tranquilla, Flemming Merkel3, Teresa Militão10, Børge Moe, William A. Montevecchi21, Virginia Morera-Pujol10, Anders Mosbech3, Verónica C. Neves, Mark Newell, Bergur Olsen, Vitor H. Paiva8, Hans-Ulrich Peter18, Aevar Petersen, Richard A. Phillips22, Iván Ramírez1, Jaime A. Ramos8, Raül Ramos10, Robert A. Ronconi23, Peter G. Ryan15, Niels Martin Schmidt3, Ingvar A. Sigurðsson, Benoît Sittler24, Harald Steen25, Iain J. Stenhouse, Hallvard Strøm25, Geir Helge Systad, Paul M. Thompson26, Thorkell Lindberg Thórarinsson, Rob van Bemmelen, Sarah Wanless, Francis Zino, Maria P. Dias7, Maria P. Dias1 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify important aggregations of seabirds in the North Atlantic to inform ongoing regional conservation efforts and identify a major hotspot associated with a discrete area of the subpolar frontal zone.
Abstract: The conservation of migratory marine species, including pelagic seabirds, is challenging because their movements span vast distances frequently beyond national jurisdictions. Here, we aim to identify important aggregations of seabirds in the North Atlantic to inform ongoing regional conservation efforts. Using tracking, phenology, and population data, we mapped the abundance and diversity of 21 seabird species. This revealed a major hotspot associated with a discrete area of the subpolar frontal zone, used annually by 2.9–5 million seabirds from ≥56 colonies in the Atlantic: the first time this magnitude of seabird concentrations has been documented in the high seas. The hotspot is temporally stable and amenable to site-based conservation and is under consideration as a marine protected area by the OSPAR Commission. Protection could help mitigate current and future threats facing species in the area. Overall, our approach provides an exemplar data-driven pathway for future conservation efforts on the high seas.

34 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Martin Beal1, Martin Beal2, Maria P. Dias1, Maria P. Dias2, Richard A. Phillips3, Steffen Oppel4, Carolina Hazin2, Elizabeth J. Pearmain2, Josh Adams5, David J. Anderson6, Michelle Antolos7, Javier Arata, José Manuel Arcos, John P. Y. Arnould8, Jill A. Awkerman9, Elizabeth A. Bell, Michael A. Bell, Mark Carey10, Ryan D. Carle11, Thomas A. Clay12, Jaimie Cleeland13, Valentina Colodro11, Melinda G. Conners14, Marta Cruz-Flores15, Richard J. Cuthbert16, Karine Delord17, Lorna Deppe, Ben J. Dilley13, Herculano Andrade Dinis, Graeme Elliott, Fernanda De Felipe15, Jonathan J. Felis5, Manuela G. Forero18, Amanda N. D. Freeman, Akira Fukuda19, Jacob González-Solís15, José Pedro Granadeiro20, April Hedd, Peter Hodum11, Peter Hodum21, José Manuel Igual18, Audrey Jaeger22, Todd J. Landers23, Todd J. Landers24, Todd J. Landers25, Matthieu Le Corre22, Azwianewi B. Makhado13, Benjamin Metzger, Teresa Militão15, William A. Montevecchi26, Virginia Morera-Pujol15, Leia Navarro-Herrero15, Deon Nel, D. G. Nicholls27, Daniel Oro18, Ridha Ouni28, Kiyoaki Ozaki29, Flavio Quintana30, Raül Ramos15, Tim Reid31, José Manuel Reyes-González15, Christopher J. R. Robertson32, Graham Robertson, Mohamed Salah Romdhane33, Peter G. Ryan13, Paul M. Sagar34, Fumio Sato29, Stefan Schoombie13, R. Paul Scofield35, Scott A. Shaffer36, Nirmal Shah37, Kim L. Stevens13, Christopher A. Surman, Robert M. Suryan7, Akinori Takahashi38, Vikash Tatayah39, Graeme A. Taylor32, David R. Thompson34, Leigh G. Torres7, Kath Walker, Ross M. Wanless13, Ross M. Wanless40, Susan M. Waugh32, Henri Weimerskirch17, Takashi Yamamoto41, Zuzana Zajková15, Laura Zango15, Paulo Catry1 
TL;DR: This work quantified the links among national populations of these threatened seabirds and the regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) which regulate fishing in the high seas, making explicit the relative responsibilities that each country and RFMO has for the management of shared biodiversity.
Abstract: Migratory marine species cross political borders and enter the high seas, where the lack of an effective global management framework for biodiversity leaves them vulnerable to threats. Here, we combine 10,108 tracks from 5775 individual birds at 87 sites with data on breeding population sizes to estimate the relative year-round importance of national jurisdictions and high seas areas for 39 species of albatrosses and large petrels. Populations from every country made extensive use of the high seas, indicating the stake each country has in the management of biodiversity in international waters. We quantified the links among national populations of these threatened seabirds and the regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) which regulate fishing in the high seas. This work makes explicit the relative responsibilities that each country and RFMO has for the management of shared biodiversity, providing invaluable information for the conservation and management of migratory species in the marine realm.

31 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the importance of the biodiversity crisis for human and non-human prosperity and the central role of human behaviour in reversing this decline and discuss key gaps in our understanding of how to achieve behaviour change for biodiversity conservation and suggest how to identify key behaviour changes and actors capable of improving biodiversity outcomes.
Abstract: Human activities are degrading ecosystems worldwide, posing existential threats for biodiversity and humankind. Slowing and reversing this degradation will require profound and widespread changes to human behaviour. Behavioural scientists are therefore well placed to contribute intellectual leadership in this area. This Perspective aims to stimulate a marked increase in the amount and breadth of behavioural research addressing this challenge. First, we describe the importance of the biodiversity crisis for human and non-human prosperity and the central role of human behaviour in reversing this decline. Next, we discuss key gaps in our understanding of how to achieve behaviour change for biodiversity conservation and suggest how to identify key behaviour changes and actors capable of improving biodiversity outcomes. Finally, we outline the core components for building a robust evidence base and suggest priority research questions for behavioural scientists to explore in opening a new frontier of behavioural science for the benefit of nature and human wellbeing.

28 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme (PCMBS) as discussed by the authors is a large scale database of 170 species of birds collected by around fifteen thousand fieldworkers annually counting breeding birds using standardized protocols in 28 European countries.
Abstract: Around fifteen thousand fieldworkers annually count breeding birds using standardized protocols in 28 European countries. The observations are collected by using country-specific and standardized protocols, validated, summarized and finally used for the production of continent-wide annual and long-term indices of population size changes of 170 species. Here, we present the database and provide a detailed summary of the methodology used for fieldwork and calculation of the relative population size change estimates. We also provide a brief overview of how the data are used in research, conservation and policy. We believe this unique database, based on decades of bird monitoring alongside the comprehensive summary of its methodology, will facilitate and encourage further use of the Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme results. Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13240760

26 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors use telemetry data from 220 migratory Egyptian vultures, tracked for 3,186 bird months and across approximately 70% of the species' global distribution, to test for differences in survival throughout the annual cycle.
Abstract: Long-distance migrations are among the most physically demanding feats animals perform. Understanding the potential costs and benefits of such behaviour is a fundamental question in ecology and evolution. A hypothetical cost of migration should be outweighed by higher productivity and/or higher annual survival, but few studies on migratory species have been able to directly quantify patterns of survival throughout the full annual cycle and across the majority of a species' range. Here, we use telemetry data from 220 migratory Egyptian vultures Neophron percnopterus, tracked for 3,186 bird months and across approximately 70% of the species' global distribution, to test for differences in survival throughout the annual cycle. We estimated monthly survival probability relative to migration and latitude using a multi-event capture-recapture model in a Bayesian framework that accounted for age, origin, subpopulation and the uncertainty of classifying fates from tracking data. We found lower survival during migration compared to stationary periods (β = -0.816; 95% credible interval: -1.290 to -0.318) and higher survival on non-breeding grounds at southern latitudes (<25°N; β = 0.664; 0.076-1.319) compared to on breeding grounds. Survival was also higher for individuals originating from Western Europe (β = 0.664; 0.110-1.330) as compared to further east in Europe and Asia, and improved with age (β = 0.030; 0.020-0.042). Anthropogenic mortalities accounted for half of the mortalities with a known cause and occurred mainly in northern latitudes. Many juveniles drowned in the Mediterranean Sea on their first autumn migration while there were few confirmed mortalities in the Sahara Desert, indicating that migration barriers are likely species-specific. Our study advances the understanding of important fitness trade-offs associated with long-distance migration. We conclude that there is lower survival associated with migration, but that this may be offset by higher non-breeding survival at lower latitudes. We found more human-caused mortality farther north, and suggest that increasing anthropogenic mortality could disrupt the delicate migration trade-off balance. Research to investigate further potential benefits of migration (e.g. differential productivity across latitudes) could clarify how migration evolved and how migrants may persist in a rapidly changing world.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2021
TL;DR: Grupo de Investigaciones en Biología de la Conservación (GRINBIC), INIBIOMA (Universidad Nacional del Comahue-CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina Institute for Game and Wildlife Research, IREC (CSIC-UCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain Fitzpatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Orwigsburg, Pennsylvania Department of Evolutionary Ecology,
Abstract: Grupo de Investigaciones en Biología de la Conservación (GRINBIC), INIBIOMA (Universidad Nacional del Comahue—CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina Institute for Game and Wildlife Research, IREC (CSIC-UCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain Fitzpatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Orwigsburg, Pennsylvania Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain Endangered Wildlife Trust, Modderfontein, South Africa Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, UK Animal Demography and Ecology Unit, IMEDEA (CSIC)-UIB, Esporles, Spain CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS—Université de Montpellier—Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier—EPHE, Montpellier, France Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK Departamento de Biología de la Conservación, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Sevilla, Spain The Peregrine Fund, Boise, Idaho National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain The Helsinki Lab of Ornithology, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 13th annual horizon scan of issues likely to impact on biodiversity conservation is presented in this paper, where a global panel of 26 scientists and practitioners identified 15 issues that they believe to represent the highest priorities for tracking and action.
Abstract: We present the results of our 13th annual horizon scan of issues likely to impact on biodiversity conservation. Issues are either novel within the biological conservation sector or could cause a substantial step-change in impact, either globally or regionally. Our global panel of 26 scientists and practitioners identified 15 issues that we believe to represent the highest priorities for tracking and action. Many of the issues we identified, including the impact of satellite megaconstellations and the use of long-distance wireless energy transfer, have both elements of threats and emerging opportunities. A recent state-sponsored application to commence deep-sea mining represents a significant step-change in impact. We hope that this horizon scan will increase research and policy attention on the highlighted issues.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Track2KBA as discussed by the authors identifies important sites at the population level using tracking data from individual animals based on three key steps: identifying individual core areas, assessing population-level representativeness of the sample and quantifying spatial overlap among individuals and scaling up to the population.
Abstract: Identifying important sites for biodiversity is vital for conservation and management. However, there is a lack of accessible, easily applied tools that enable practitioners to delineate important sites for highly mobile species using established criteria. We introduce the R package ‘track2KBA’, a tool to identify important sites at the population level using tracking data from individual animals based on three key steps: (a) identifying individual core areas, (b) assessing population-level representativeness of the sample and (c) quantifying spatial overlap among individuals and scaling up to the population. We describe package functionality and exemplify its application using tracking data from three taxa in contrasting environments: a seal, a marine turtle and a migratory land bird. This tool facilitates the delineation of sites of ecological relevance for diverse taxa and provides output useful for assessing their importance to a population or species, as in the Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) Standard. As such, ‘track2KBA’ can contribute directly to conservation planning at global and regional levels.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the effect of tree-fall canopy gaps on the activity of decomposer communities and the rate of deadwood decay in tropical rainforests was investigated. And the authors showed that this accelerated decomposition increases regional wood decay rate by up to 18.2%.
Abstract: Tree mortality rates are increasing within tropical rainforests as a result of global environmental change. When trees die, gaps are created in forest canopies and carbon is transferred from the living to deadwood pools. However, little is known about the effect of tree-fall canopy gaps on the activity of decomposer communities and the rate of deadwood decay in forests. This means that the accuracy of regional and global carbon budgets is uncertain, especially given ongoing changes to the structure of rainforest ecosystems. Therefore, to determine the effect of canopy openings on wood decay rates and regional carbon flux, we carried out the first assessment of deadwood mass loss within canopy gaps in old-growth rainforest. We used replicated canopy gaps paired with closed canopy sites in combination with macroinvertebrate accessible and inaccessible woodblocks to experimentally partition the relative contribution of microbes vs. termites to decomposition within contrasting understorey conditions. We show that over a 12 month period, wood mass loss increased by 63% in canopy gaps compared with closed canopy sites and that this increase was driven by termites. Using LiDAR data to quantify the proportion of canopy openings in the study region, we modelled the effect of observed changes in decomposition within gaps on regional carbon flux. Overall, we estimate that this accelerated decomposition increases regional wood decay rate by up to 18.2%, corresponding to a flux increase of 0.27 Mg C ha-1 year-1 that is not currently accounted for in regional carbon budgets. These results provide the first insights into how small-scale disturbances in rainforests can generate hotspots for decomposer activity and carbon fluxes. In doing so, we show that including canopy gap dynamics and their impacts on wood decomposition in forest ecosystems can help improve the predictive accuracy of the carbon cycle in land surface models.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors quantify whether the introduction of a new regulation that required the use of bird-scaring lines reduced seabird mortality in two of the most hazardous fisheries in the South Atlantic.

Journal ArticleDOI
Antica Culina, Frank Adriaensen1, Liam D. Bailey2, Malcolm D. Burgess3, Malcolm D. Burgess4, Anne Charmantier, Ella F. Cole5, Tapio Eeva6, Erik Matthysen1, Chloé R. Nater7, Ben C. Sheldon5, Bernt-Erik Sæther7, Stefan J. G. Vriend7, Zuzana Zajková, Peter Adamík, Lucy M. Aplin8, Lucy M. Aplin9, Elena Angulo10, Alexandr Artemyev11, Emilio Barba12, Sanja Barišić13, Eduardo J. Belda14, C. Can Bilgin15, Josefa Bleu, Christiaan Both16, Sandra Bouwhuis, Claire J. Branston17, Juli Broggi10, Terry Burke18, A.V. Bushuev19, Carlos Camacho20, Daniela Campobello21, David Canal, Alejandro Cantarero6, Samuel P. Caro, Maxime Cauchoix22, Alexis S. Chaine22, Mariusz Cichoń23, Davor Ćiković13, Camillo Cusimano, Caroline Deimel8, André A. Dhondt24, André A. Dhondt1, Niels Jeroen Dingemanse25, Blandine Doligez26, Blandine Doligez27, Davide M. Dominoni17, Claire Doutrelant, Szymon M. Drobniak23, Szymon M. Drobniak28, Anna Dubiec29, Marcel Eens1, Kjell Einar Erikstad30, Silvia Espín31, Damien R. Farine8, Damien R. Farine9, Jordi Figuerola10, Pınar Kavak Gülbeyaz32, Pınar Kavak Gülbeyaz15, Arnaud Grégoire, Ian R. Hartley33, Michaela Hau8, Michaela Hau9, Gergely Hegyi34, Sabine Marlene Hille35, Camilla A. Hinde36, Benedikt Holtmann25, T.A. Ilyina19, Caroline Isaksson20, Arne Iserbyt1, E.V. Ivankina19, Wojciech Kania29, Bart Kempenaers8, Anvar Kerimov19, Jan Komdeur16, Peter Korsten37, Miroslav Král, Miloš Krist, Marcel M. Lambrechts, Carlos E. Lara38, Agu Leivits, András Liker39, Jaanis Lodjak40, Marko Mägi40, Mark C. Mainwaring41, Raivo Mänd40, Bruno Massa, Sylvie Massemin, Jesús Martínez-Padilla10, Tomasz D. Mazgajski29, Adèle Mennerat42, Juan Moreno10, Alexia Mouchet25, Shinichi Nakagawa28, Jan-Åke Nilsson20, Johan Nilsson20, Ana Cláudia Norte43, Kees van Oers44, Markku Orell45, Jaime Potti10, John L. Quinn46, Denis Réale47, Tone Kristin Reiertsen30, Balázs Rosivall34, Andrew F. Russell3, Seppo Rytkönen45, Pablo Sánchez-Virosta31, Eduardo S. A. Santos48, Julia Schroeder49, Juan Carlos Senar, Gábor Seress39, Tore Slagsvold50, Marta Szulkin51, Céline Teplitsky, Vallo Tilgar40, Andrey Tolstoguzov11, János Török34, Mihai Valcu8, Emma Vatka52, Simon Verhulst16, Hannah Watson20, Teru Yuta53, Teru Yuta54, José M. Zamora-Marín31, Marcel E. Visser 
University of Antwerp1, Leibniz Association2, University of Exeter3, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds4, University of Oxford5, University of Turku6, Norwegian University of Science and Technology7, Max Planck Society8, University of Konstanz9, Spanish National Research Council10, Russian Academy of Sciences11, University of Valencia12, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts13, Polytechnic University of Valencia14, Middle East Technical University15, University of Groningen16, University of Glasgow17, University of Sheffield18, Moscow State University19, Lund University20, University of Palermo21, Centre national de la recherche scientifique22, Jagiellonian University23, Cornell University24, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich25, University of Lyon26, Uppsala University27, University of New South Wales28, Museum and Institute of Zoology29, Norwegian Institute for Air Research30, University of Murcia31, Hacettepe University32, Lancaster University33, Eötvös Loránd University34, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna35, Anglia Ruskin University36, Bielefeld University37, University of Otago38, University of Pannonia39, University of Tartu40, University of Montana41, University of Bergen42, University of Coimbra43, Wageningen University and Research Centre44, University of Oulu45, University College Cork46, Université du Québec à Montréal47, University of São Paulo48, Imperial College London49, University of Oslo50, University of Warsaw51, University of Helsinki52, Yamashina Institute for Ornithology53, Hokkaido University54
TL;DR: The SPI‐Birds Network and Database is created, a large‐scale initiative that connects data from, and researchers working on, studies of wild populations of individually recognizable (usually ringed) birds, and acts as a data hub and a catalogue of studied populations.
Abstract: The SPI-Birds have been supported by an NWO personal grant (grant number 016.Veni.181.054) to A.C., and a Research Council of Norway grant: 223257 (SFF-III) and 267511 (EVOCLIM).

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a combination of vessel-based surveys and Global Positioning System tracking to show that pelagic seabirds breeding at the tropical island that first inspired Ashmole's hypothesis do indeed deplete their primary prey species (flying fish; Exocoetidae spp.) over a considerable area.
Abstract: Colonially breeding birds and mammals form some of the largest gatherings of apex predators in the natural world and have provided model systems for studying mechanisms of population regulation in animals. According to one influential hypothesis, intense competition for food among large numbers of spatially constrained foragers should result in a zone of prey depletion surrounding such colonies, ultimately limiting their size. However, while indirect and theoretical support for this phenomenon, known as "Ashmole's halo," has steadily accumulated, direct evidence remains exceptionally scarce. Using a combination of vessel-based surveys and Global Positioning System tracking, we show that pelagic seabirds breeding at the tropical island that first inspired Ashmole's hypothesis do indeed deplete their primary prey species (flying fish; Exocoetidae spp.) over a considerable area, with reduced prey density detectable >150 km from the colony. The observed prey gradient was mirrored by an opposing trend in seabird foraging effort, could not be explained by confounding environmental variability, and can be approximated using a mechanistic consumption-dispersion model, incorporating realistic rates of seabird predation and random prey dispersal. Our results provide a rare view of the resource footprint of a pelagic seabird colony and reveal how aggregations of these central-place foraging, marine top predators profoundly influence the oceans that surround them.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 2018 summer drought was used to assess resilience across three different UK peatland areas by considering the timescale of the soil moisture proxy recovery, and results show clear areas of lower resilience within all three study sites.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: However, although 28% of UK land is reported by the UK government to be protected, only 11.4% of land area falls within protected areas designated primarily for nature conservation.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identified and categorised, into 19 themes and 70 sub-themes, the ways in which biodiversity and its conservation has been or could be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic globally; nearly 60% of which were broadly negative in impact.
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on almost all aspects of human society and endeavour; the natural world and its conservation have not been spared. Through a process of expert consultation, we identified and categorised, into 19 themes and 70 sub-themes, the ways in which biodiversity and its conservation has been or could be impacted by the pandemic globally; nearly 60% of which were broadly negative in impact. Subsequently, we created a compendium (see Supporting Information) of all themes and sub-themes, each with explanatory text, and in August 2020 a diverse group of experienced conservationists with expertise from across sectors and geographies assessed each sub-theme for its likely impact on biodiversity conservation globally. The 9 sub-themes ranked highest were all negative in impact. These were, in rank order: governments side-lining the environment during their economic recovery, reduced wildlife-based tourism income, increased habitat destruction, reduced government funding, increased plastic and other solid waste pollution, weakening of pro-nature regulations and their enforcement, increased illegal harvest of wild animals, reduced philanthropy, and threats to survival of conservation organisations. In combination, these impacts present a worrying future of increased threats to biodiversity conservation but reduced capacity to counter them. The highest-ranking positive impact, at 10, was the beneficial impact of wildlife trade restrictions. More optimistically, amongst impacts ranked 11 to 20, 6 were positive and 4 were negative. We hope our assessment will draw attention to the impacts of the pandemic, improving the conservation community's ability to respond to them in the future. Article impact statement: The COVID-19 pandemic presents increased threats to biodiversity conservation globally yet reduced capacity to counter them. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used an ensemble forecasting approach to predict changes in taxon-specific distribution under future scenarios of climate, land use and human populations for (1) areas outside protected areas (PAs), (2) the entire study region and (3) interspecies range overlap.
Abstract: Aim: Modelling African great ape distribution has until now focused on current or past conditions, while future scenarios remain scarcely explored. Using an ensemble forecasting approach, we predicted changes in taxon-specific distribution under future scenarios of climate, land use and human populations for (1) areas outside protected areas (PAs) only (assuming complete management effectiveness of PAs), (2) the entire study region and (3) interspecies range overlap. Location: Tropical Africa. Methods: We compiled occurrence data (n = 5,203) on African apes from the IUCN A.P.E.S. database and extracted relevant climate-, habitat- and human-related predictors representing current and future (2050) conditions to predict taxon-specific range change under a best- and a worst-case scenario, using ensemble forecasting. Results: The predictive performance of the models varied across taxa. Synergistic interactions between predictors are shaping African ape distribution, particularly human-related variables. On average across taxa, a range decline of 50% is expected outside PAs under the best scenario if no dispersal occurs (61% in worst scenario). Otherwise, an 85% range reduction is predicted to occur across study regions (94% worst). However, range gains are predicted outside PAs if dispersal occurs (52% best, 21% worst), with a slight increase in gains expected across study regions (66% best, 24% worst). Moreover, more than half of range losses and gains are predicted to occur outside PAs where interspecific ranges overlap. Main Conclusions: Massive range decline is expected by 2050, but range gain is uncertain as African apes will not be able to occupy these new areas immediately due to their limited dispersal capacity, migration lag and ecological constraints. Given that most future range changes are predicted outside PAs, Africa's current PA network is likely to be insufficient for preserving suitable habitats and maintaining connected ape populations. Thus, conservation planners urgently need to integrate land use planning and climate change mitigation measures at all decision-making levels both in range countries and abroad.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A categorization of conflict intensity based on the curve of conflict, a model originally used to track the escalation and deescalation of armed conflicts, is developed to allow for a better understanding of the drivers of conservation conflict development across a diverse range of socioecological scenarios.
Abstract: Conflicts between the interests of biodiversity conservation and other human activities pose a major threat to natural ecosystems and human well-being, yet few methods exist to quantify their intensity and model their dynamics. We develop a categorization of conflict intensity based on the curve of conflict, a model originally used to track the escalation and deescalation of armed conflicts. Our categorization assigns six intensity levels reflecting the discourse and actions of stakeholders involved in a given conflict, from coexistence or collaboration to physical violence. Using a range of case studies, we demonstrate the value of our approach in quantifying conflict trends, estimating transition probabilities between conflict stages, and modeling conflict intensity as a function of relevant covariates. By taking an evidence-based approach to quantifying stakeholder behavior, the proposed framework allows for a better understanding of the drivers of conservation conflict development across a diverse range of socioecological scenarios.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied whether Second Generation Anticoagulant Rodenticides (SGARs) may have contributed to the widespread population declines of a rodent-eating raptor, the Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in the UK.
Abstract: Rats and mice can damage food and agricultural products as well as transmit diseases, thereby requiring control of their numbers. Application of Second Generation Anticoagulant Rodenticides (SGARs) often reduces rodent numbers locally. However, predators eating rodents, including non-target species, that have consumed SGARs may be secondarily exposed and potentially lethally poisoned. Here we study whether SGARs may have contributed to the widespread population declines of a rodent-eating raptor, the Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in the UK. We show that 161 (66.8%) of the 241 Kestrels submitted for ecotoxicology tests between 1997 and 2012 had detectable levels of at least one SGAR in their livers. Adult Kestrels had significantly higher prevalence of SGARs than juveniles, suggesting accumulation of SGARs through time. The prevalence and concentrations of individual SGARs in Kestrels were significantly higher in England than in Scotland. SGAR prevalence in Kestrels were positively associated with some land cover types, primarily arable cereals and broad-leaved woodland, and negatively associated with mainly mean elevation, probably reflecting variation in SGAR usage across land cover types. By using volunteer-collected data on national Kestrel abundance 1997-2012, we show that there is a negative correlation between the Kestrel population index in a specific year and the concentration of bromadialone as well as the total SGAR concentration in the same year. Although correlative, this is the first study to provide evidence for a potential population-limiting effect of SGARs on a raptor.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used an expert assessment to prioritise which threats to mitigate in 13 countries along the eastern Mediterranean flyway to protect globally threatened Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe a method for using camera traps for monitoring small mammals, such as small rodents (Rodentia: Muroidea) and shrews (Insectivora: Soricidae), and demonstrate the use of the method by comparing occurrences of small mammals in a peatland landscape containing plantations and ex-forestry areas undergoing bog restoration.
Abstract: Small mammals, such as small rodents (Rodentia: Muroidea) and shrews (Insectivora: Soricidae), present particular challenges in camera trap surveys. Their size is often insufficient to trigger infra-red sensors, whilst resultant images may be of inadequate quality for species identification. The conventional survey method for small mammals, live-trapping, can be both labour-intensive and detrimental to animal welfare. Here, we describe a method for using camera traps for monitoring small mammals. We show that by attaching the camera trap to a baited tunnel, fixing a close-focus lens over the camera trap lens, and reducing the flash intensity, pictures or videos can be obtained of sufficient quality for identifying species. We demonstrate the use of the method by comparing occurrences of small mammals in a peatland landscape containing (i) plantation forestry (planted on drained former blanket bog), (ii) ex-forestry areas undergoing bog restoration, and (iii) unmodified blanket bog habitat. Rodents were detected only in forestry and restoration areas, whilst shrews were detected across all habitat. The odds of detecting small mammals were 7.6 times higher on camera traps set in plantation forestry than in unmodified bog, and 3.7 times higher on camera traps in restoration areas than in bog. When absolute abundance estimates are not required, and camera traps are available, this technique provides a low-cost survey method that is labour-efficient and has minimal animal welfare implications.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that curlew survival rates are reduced by cold weather and at high density; however, overall survival rates have increased in recent years and efforts to stabilise and reverse declines should focus on increasing breeding success.