scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Barcelona

EducationBarcelona, Spain
About: University of Barcelona is a education organization based out in Barcelona, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 46197 authors who have published 108576 publications receiving 3723377 citations. The organization is also known as: Universitat de Barcelona & UB.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Norman A. Grogin1, Dale D. Kocevski2, Sandra M. Faber2, Henry C. Ferguson1, Anton M. Koekemoer1, Adam G. Riess3, Viviana Acquaviva4, David M. Alexander5, Omar Almaini6, Matthew L. N. Ashby7, Marco Barden8, Eric F. Bell9, Frédéric Bournaud10, Thomas M. Brown1, Karina Caputi11, Stefano Casertano1, Paolo Cassata12, Marco Castellano, Peter Challis7, Ranga-Ram Chary13, Edmond Cheung2, Michele Cirasuolo14, Christopher J. Conselice6, Asantha Cooray15, Darren J. Croton16, Emanuele Daddi10, Tomas Dahlen1, Romeel Davé17, Duilia F. de Mello18, Duilia F. de Mello19, Avishai Dekel20, Mark Dickinson, Timothy Dolch3, Jennifer L. Donley1, James Dunlop11, Aaron A. Dutton21, David Elbaz10, Giovanni G. Fazio7, Alexei V. Filippenko22, Steven L. Finkelstein23, Adriano Fontana, Jonathan P. Gardner18, Peter M. Garnavich24, Eric Gawiser4, Mauro Giavalisco12, Andrea Grazian, Yicheng Guo12, Nimish P. Hathi25, Boris Häussler6, Philip F. Hopkins22, Jiasheng Huang26, Kuang-Han Huang1, Kuang-Han Huang3, Saurabh Jha4, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Robert P. Kirshner7, David C. Koo2, Kamson Lai2, Kyoung-Soo Lee27, Weidong Li22, Jennifer M. Lotz1, Ray A. Lucas1, Piero Madau2, Patrick J. McCarthy25, Elizabeth J. McGrath2, Daniel H. McIntosh28, Ross J. McLure11, Bahram Mobasher29, Leonidas A. Moustakas13, Mark Mozena2, Kirpal Nandra30, Jeffrey A. Newman31, Sami Niemi1, Kai G. Noeske1, Casey Papovich23, Laura Pentericci, Alexandra Pope12, Joel R. Primack2, Abhijith Rajan1, Swara Ravindranath32, Naveen A. Reddy29, Alvio Renzini, Hans-Walter Rix30, Aday R. Robaina33, Steven A. Rodney3, David J. Rosario30, Piero Rosati34, S. Salimbeni12, Claudia Scarlata35, Brian Siana29, Luc Simard36, Joseph Smidt15, Rachel S. Somerville4, Hyron Spinrad22, Amber Straughn18, Louis-Gregory Strolger37, Olivia Telford31, Harry I. Teplitz13, Jonathan R. Trump2, Arjen van der Wel30, Carolin Villforth1, Risa H. Wechsler38, Benjamin J. Weiner17, Tommy Wiklind39, Vivienne Wild11, Grant W. Wilson12, Stijn Wuyts30, Hao Jing Yan40, Min S. Yun12 
TL;DR: The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) as discussed by the authors was designed to document the first third of galactic evolution, from z approx. 8 - 1.5 to test their accuracy as standard candles for cosmology.
Abstract: The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) is designed to document the first third of galactic evolution, from z approx. 8 - 1.5. It will image > 250,000 distant galaxies using three separate cameras on the Hubble Space Tele8cope, from the mid-UV to near-IR, and will find and measure Type Ia supernovae beyond z > 1.5 to test their accuracy as standard candles for cosmology. Five premier multi-wavelength sky regions are selected, each with extensive ancillary data. The use of five widely separated fields mitigates cosmic variance and yields statistically robust and complete samples of galaxies down to a stellar mass of 10(exp 9) solar mass to z approx. 2, reaching the knee of the UV luminosity function of galaxies to z approx. 8. The survey covers approximately 800 square arc minutes and is divided into two parts. The CANDELS/Deep survey (5(sigma) point-source limit H =27.7mag) covers approx. 125 square arcminutes within GOODS-N and GOODS-S. The CANDELS/Wide survey includes GOODS and three additional fields (EGS, COSMOS, and UDS) and covers the full area to a 50(sigma) point-source limit of H ? or approx. = 27.0 mag. Together with the Hubble Ultradeep Fields, the strategy creates a three-tiered "wedding cake" approach that has proven efficient for extragalactic surveys. Data from the survey are non-proprietary and are useful for a wide variety of science investigations. In this paper, we describe the basic motivations for the survey, the CANDELS team science goals and the resulting observational requirements, the field selection and geometry, and the observing design.

2,088 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using data from the Malaspina 2010 circumnavigation, regional surveys, and previously published reports, this work shows a worldwide distribution of plastic on the surface of the open ocean, mostly accumulating in the convergence zones of each of the five subtropical gyres with comparable density.
Abstract: There is a rising concern regarding the accumulation of floating plastic debris in the open ocean. However, the magnitude and the fate of this pollution are still open questions. Using data from the Malaspina 2010 circumnavigation, regional surveys, and previously published reports, we show a worldwide distribution of plastic on the surface of the open ocean, mostly accumulating in the convergence zones of each of the five subtropical gyres with comparable density. However, the global load of plastic on the open ocean surface was estimated to be on the order of tens of thousands of tons, far less than expected. Our observations of the size distribution of floating plastic debris point at important size-selective sinks removing millimeter-sized fragments of floating plastic on a large scale. This sink may involve a combination of fast nano-fragmentation of the microplastic into particles of microns or smaller, their transference to the ocean interior by food webs and ballasting processes, and processes yet to be discovered. Resolving the fate of the missing plastic debris is of fundamental importance to determine the nature and significance of the impacts of plastic pollution in the ocean.

2,078 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
S. Hong Lee1, Stephan Ripke2, Stephan Ripke3, Benjamin M. Neale3  +402 moreInstitutions (124)
TL;DR: Empirical evidence of shared genetic etiology for psychiatric disorders can inform nosology and encourages the investigation of common pathophysiologies for related disorders.
Abstract: Most psychiatric disorders are moderately to highly heritable. The degree to which genetic variation is unique to individual disorders or shared across disorders is unclear. To examine shared genetic etiology, we use genome-wide genotype data from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) for cases and controls in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We apply univariate and bivariate methods for the estimation of genetic variation within and covariation between disorders. SNPs explained 17-29% of the variance in liability. The genetic correlation calculated using common SNPs was high between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (0.68 ± 0.04 s.e.), moderate between schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (0.43 ± 0.06 s.e.), bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (0.47 ± 0.06 s.e.), and ADHD and major depressive disorder (0.32 ± 0.07 s.e.), low between schizophrenia and ASD (0.16 ± 0.06 s.e.) and non-significant for other pairs of disorders as well as between psychiatric disorders and the negative control of Crohn's disease. This empirical evidence of shared genetic etiology for psychiatric disorders can inform nosology and encourages the investigation of common pathophysiologies for related disorders.

2,058 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Andrew G. Clark1, Michael B. Eisen2, Michael B. Eisen3, Douglas Smith  +426 moreInstitutions (70)
08 Nov 2007-Nature
TL;DR: These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution.
Abstract: Comparative analysis of multiple genomes in a phylogenetic framework dramatically improves the precision and sensitivity of evolutionary inference, producing more robust results than single-genome analyses can provide. The genomes of 12 Drosophila species, ten of which are presented here for the first time (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi), illustrate how rates and patterns of sequence divergence across taxa can illuminate evolutionary processes on a genomic scale. These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution. Despite remarkable similarities among these Drosophila species, we identified many putatively non-neutral changes in protein-coding genes, non-coding RNA genes, and cis-regulatory regions. These may prove to underlie differences in the ecology and behaviour of these diverse species.

2,057 citations


Authors

Showing all 46622 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joan Massagué189408149951
Michael Snyder169840130225
Michael R. Stratton161443142586
Johan Auwerx15865395779
Bart Staels15282486638
David D'Enterria1501592116210
Thomas E. Starzl150162591704
Manel Esteller14671396429
Peter B. Jones145185794641
Carlos Cordon-Cardo14458984862
Kjell Fuxe142147989846
Kenneth M. Yamada13944672136
John G.F. Cleland1371172110227
António Amorim136147796519
Elias Campo13576185160
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Spanish National Research Council
220.4K papers, 7.6M citations

93% related

University of Milan
139.7K papers, 4.6M citations

93% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

93% related

Sapienza University of Rome
155.4K papers, 4.3M citations

93% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023232
2022629
20217,410
20207,004
20196,046
20185,529