scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Barcelona

EducationBarcelona, Spain
About: University of Barcelona is a education organization based out in Barcelona, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 46197 authors who have published 108576 publications receiving 3723377 citations. The organization is also known as: Universitat de Barcelona & UB.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Survey data from across 19 countries reveal heterogeneity in attitudes toward acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine and suggest that trust in government is associated with vaccine confidence.
Abstract: Several coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are currently in human trials. In June 2020, we surveyed 13,426 people in 19 countries to determine potential acceptance rates and factors influencing acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 71.5% of participants reported that they would be very or somewhat likely to take a COVID-19 vaccine, and 48.1% reported that they would accept their employer's recommendation to do so. Differences in acceptance rates ranged from almost 90% (in China) to less than 55% (in Russia). Respondents reporting higher levels of trust in information from government sources were more likely to accept a vaccine and take their employer's advice to do so.

1,923 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An improvement to the BCR sequential extraction procedure through intercomparison exercises is offered, which will allow the obtaining of CRMs to validate analytical data in the analysis of soils and sediments, and it will also facilitate comparability ofData in the European Union.
Abstract: The Standards, Measurements and Testing Programme (formerly BCR) of the European Commission proposed a three-step sequential extraction procedure for sediment analysis, following extensive expert consultations and two interlaboratory studies. This scheme was recently used to certify the extractable trace element contents of a sediment reference material (CRM 601). Although this procedure offers a means to ensure the comparability of data in this field, some difficulties concerning the interlaboratory reproducibility still remain, and a new project is currently being conducted to determine the causes of poor reproducibility in the extraction scheme. The final objective of the project is the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials for their extractable contents of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn. This paper presents the results of a small-scale interlaboratory study, which aimed to test a revised version of the extraction schemes by comparing the original and the modified protocols using the CRM 601 sample. This work offers an improvement to the BCR sequential extraction procedure through intercomparison exercises. This improved procedure will allow the obtaining of CRMs to validate analytical data in the analysis of soils and sediments, and it will also facilitate comparability of data in the European Union.

1,922 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Paul Bastard1, Paul Bastard2, Paul Bastard3, Lindsey B. Rosen4, Qian Zhang3, Eleftherios Michailidis3, Hans-Heinrich Hoffmann3, Yu Zhang4, Karim Dorgham1, Quentin Philippot2, Quentin Philippot1, Jérémie Rosain1, Jérémie Rosain2, Vivien Béziat3, Vivien Béziat1, Vivien Béziat2, Jeremy Manry2, Jeremy Manry1, Elana Shaw4, Liis Haljasmägi5, Pärt Peterson5, Lazaro Lorenzo2, Lazaro Lorenzo1, Lucy Bizien1, Lucy Bizien2, Sophie Trouillet-Assant6, Kerry Dobbs4, Adriana Almeida de Jesus4, Alexandre Belot6, Anne Kallaste7, Emilie Catherinot, Yacine Tandjaoui-Lambiotte2, Jérémie Le Pen3, Gaspard Kerner1, Gaspard Kerner2, Benedetta Bigio3, Yoann Seeleuthner1, Yoann Seeleuthner2, Rui Yang3, Alexandre Bolze, András N Spaan8, András N Spaan3, Ottavia M. Delmonte4, Michael S. Abers4, Alessandro Aiuti9, Giorgio Casari9, Vito Lampasona9, Lorenzo Piemonti9, Fabio Ciceri9, Kaya Bilguvar10, Richard P. Lifton3, Richard P. Lifton10, Marc Vasse, David M. Smadja1, Mélanie Migaud1, Mélanie Migaud2, Jérôme Hadjadj1, Benjamin Terrier1, Darragh Duffy11, Lluis Quintana-Murci11, Lluis Quintana-Murci12, Diederik van de Beek13, Lucie Roussel14, Donald C. Vinh14, Stuart G. Tangye15, Stuart G. Tangye16, Filomeen Haerynck17, David Dalmau18, Javier Martinez-Picado19, Javier Martinez-Picado20, Petter Brodin21, Petter Brodin22, Michel C. Nussenzweig23, Michel C. Nussenzweig3, Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis3, Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis2, Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis1, Carlos Rodríguez-Gallego, Guillaume Vogt1, Trine H. Mogensen24, Trine H. Mogensen25, Andrew J. Oler4, Jingwen Gu4, Peter D. Burbelo4, Jeffrey I. Cohen4, Andrea Biondi26, Laura Rachele Bettini26, Mariella D'Angiò26, Paolo Bonfanti26, Patrick Rossignol27, Julien Mayaux1, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat1, Eystein S. Husebye28, Eystein S. Husebye29, Eystein S. Husebye30, Francesca Fusco, Matilde Valeria Ursini, Luisa Imberti31, Alessandra Sottini31, Simone Paghera31, Eugenia Quiros-Roldan32, Camillo Rossi, Riccardo Castagnoli33, Daniela Montagna33, Amelia Licari33, Gian Luigi Marseglia33, Xavier Duval, Jade Ghosn1, Hgid Lab4, Covid Clinicians5, Covid-Storm Clinicians§4, CoV-Contact Cohort§1, Amsterdam Umc Covid Biobank3, Amsterdam Umc Covid Biobank2, Amsterdam Umc Covid Biobank1, Covid Human Genetic Effort3, John S. Tsang4, Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky4, Kai Kisand5, Michail S. Lionakis4, Anne Puel1, Anne Puel3, Anne Puel2, Shen-Ying Zhang3, Shen-Ying Zhang2, Shen-Ying Zhang1, Steven M. Holland4, Guy Gorochov1, Emmanuelle Jouanguy3, Emmanuelle Jouanguy2, Emmanuelle Jouanguy1, Charles M. Rice3, Aurélie Cobat1, Aurélie Cobat3, Aurélie Cobat2, Luigi D. Notarangelo4, Laurent Abel3, Laurent Abel2, Laurent Abel1, Helen C. Su4, Jean-Laurent Casanova 
23 Oct 2020-Science
TL;DR: A means by which individuals at highest risk of life-threatening COVID-19 can be identified is identified, and the hypothesis that neutralizing auto-Abs against type I IFNs may underlie critical CO VID-19 is tested.
Abstract: Interindividual clinical variability in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection is immense. We report that at least 101 of 987 patients with life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia had neutralizing IgG auto-Abs against IFN-ω (13 patients), the 13 types of IFN-α (36), or both (52), at the onset of critical disease; a few also had auto-Abs against the other three type I IFNs. The auto-Abs neutralize the ability of the corresponding type I IFNs to block SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. These auto-Abs were not found in 663 individuals with asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and were present in only 4 of 1,227 healthy individuals. Patients with auto-Abs were aged 25 to 87 years and 95 were men. A B cell auto-immune phenocopy of inborn errors of type I IFN immunity underlies life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia in at least 2.6% of women and 12.5% of men.

1,913 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A modified version of the Celera assembler is developed to facilitate the identification and comparison of alternate alleles within this individual diploid genome, and a novel haplotype assembly strategy is used, able to span 1.5 Gb of genome sequence in segments >200 kb, providing further precision to the diploids nature of the genome.
Abstract: Presented here is a genome sequence of an individual human. It was produced from ∼32 million random DNA fragments, sequenced by Sanger dideoxy technology and assembled into 4,528 scaffolds, comprising 2,810 million bases (Mb) of contiguous sequence with approximately 7.5-fold coverage for any given region. We developed a modified version of the Celera assembler to facilitate the identification and comparison of alternate alleles within this individual diploid genome. Comparison of this genome and the National Center for Biotechnology Information human reference assembly revealed more than 4.1 million DNA variants, encompassing 12.3 Mb. These variants (of which 1,288,319 were novel) included 3,213,401 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 53,823 block substitutions (2–206 bp), 292,102 heterozygous insertion/deletion events (indels)(1–571 bp), 559,473 homozygous indels (1–82,711 bp), 90 inversions, as well as numerous segmental duplications and copy number variation regions. Non-SNP DNA variation accounts for 22% of all events identified in the donor, however they involve 74% of all variant bases. This suggests an important role for non-SNP genetic alterations in defining the diploid genome structure. Moreover, 44% of genes were heterozygous for one or more variants. Using a novel haplotype assembly strategy, we were able to span 1.5 Gb of genome sequence in segments >200 kb, providing further precision to the diploid nature of the genome. These data depict a definitive molecular portrait of a diploid human genome that provides a starting point for future genome comparisons and enables an era of individualized genomic information.

1,843 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lennart Lindegren1, Jose M Hernandez2, Alex Bombrun, Sergei A. Klioner3, Ulrich Bastian4, M. Ramos-Lerate, A. de Torres, H. Steidelmüller3, C.A. Stephenson5, David Hobbs1, U. Lammers2, M. Biermann4, R. Geyer3, Thomas Hilger3, Daniel Michalik1, U. Stampa4, Paul J. McMillan1, J. Castañeda6, M. Clotet6, G. Comoretto5, Michael Davidson7, C. Fabricius6, G. Gracia, Nigel Hambly7, A. Hutton, A. Mora, Jordi Portell6, F. van Leeuwen8, U. Abbas, A. Abreu, Martin Altmann9, Martin Altmann4, Alexandre Humberto Andrei, E. Anglada10, L. Balaguer-Núñez6, C. Barache9, Ugo Becciani11, Stefano Bertone12, Stefano Bertone9, Luciana Bianchi, S. Bouquillon9, Geraldine Bourda13, T. Brüsemeister4, Beatrice Bucciarelli, D. Busonero, R. Buzzi, Rossella Cancelliere14, T. Carlucci9, Patrick Charlot13, N. Cheek10, Mariateresa Crosta, C. Crowley, J. H. J. de Bruijne15, F. de Felice16, R. Drimmel, P. Esquej, Agnes Fienga17, E. Fraile, Mario Gai, N. Garralda6, J.J. González-Vidal6, Raphael Guerra2, M. Hauser4, M. Hauser18, Werner Hofmann4, B. Holl19, Stefan Jordan4, Mario G. Lattanzi, H. Lenhardt4, S. Liao20, E. Licata, Tim Lister21, W. Löffler4, Jon Marchant22, J. M. Martín-Fleitas, R. Messineo23, Francois Mignard17, Roberto Morbidelli, E. Poggio14, Alberto Riva, Nicholas Rowell7, E. Salguero, M. Sarasso, Eva Sciacca11, H. I. Siddiqui5, Richard L. Smart, Alessandro Spagna, Iain A. Steele22, F. Taris9, J. Torra6, A. van Elteren24, W. van Reeven, Alberto Vecchiato 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the input data, models, and processing used for the astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed within the ASTR task.
Abstract: Context. Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational phase.Aims. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these resultsperformed within the astrometry task.Methods. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332 million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. These data were calculated in two steps. First, the satellite attitude and the astrometric calibration parameters of the CCDs were obtained in an astrometric global iterative solution for 16 million selected sources, using about 1% of the input data. This primary solution was tied to the extragalactic International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) by means of quasars. The resulting attitude and calibration were then used to calculate the astrometric parameters of all the sources. Special validation solutions were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and proper motion.Results. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is about 0.04 mas for bright (G = 17 mag, and 0.7 masat G = 20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas yr−1 , respectively.The optical reference frame defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to the quasars to within 0.15 mas yr−1 . From the quasars and validation solutions we estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude, and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in parallax and 0.07 mas yr−1 in proper motion are seen on small ( DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.

1,836 citations


Authors

Showing all 46622 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joan Massagué189408149951
Michael Snyder169840130225
Michael R. Stratton161443142586
Johan Auwerx15865395779
Bart Staels15282486638
David D'Enterria1501592116210
Thomas E. Starzl150162591704
Manel Esteller14671396429
Peter B. Jones145185794641
Carlos Cordon-Cardo14458984862
Kjell Fuxe142147989846
Kenneth M. Yamada13944672136
John G.F. Cleland1371172110227
António Amorim136147796519
Elias Campo13576185160
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Spanish National Research Council
220.4K papers, 7.6M citations

93% related

University of Milan
139.7K papers, 4.6M citations

93% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

93% related

Sapienza University of Rome
155.4K papers, 4.3M citations

93% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023232
2022629
20217,410
20207,004
20196,046
20185,529