Institution
University of Westminster
Education•London, United Kingdom•
About: University of Westminster is a education organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 2944 authors who have published 8426 publications receiving 200236 citations. The organization is also known as: Westminster University & Royal Polytechnic Institution.
Topics: Population, Context (language use), Politics, Tourism, European union
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue for a paradigm shift in the study of the Internet and digital/social media and argue for an alternative approach that combines critical social media theory, critical digital methods and critical realist social media research ethics.
Abstract: This essay argues for a paradigm shift in the study of the Internet and digital/social media. Big data analytics is the dominant paradigm. It receives large amounts of funding, is administrative and a form of digital positivism. Critical social media research is an alternative approach that combines critical social media theory, critical digital methods and critical-realist social media research ethics. Strengthening the second approach is a material question of power in academia.
81 citations
••
TL;DR: This article examined the association between acceptance of cosmetic surgery and celebrity worship in a sample of British female undergraduates and found that celebrity worship and participant demographics explained about half of the variance in acceptance of the procedure.
81 citations
••
TL;DR: The Z specification language is used to provide an accessible and unified formal account of agent systems, allowing us to escape from the terminological chaos that surrounds agents.
Abstract: The use of agents of many different kinds in a variety of fields of computer science and
artificial intelligence is increasing rapidly and is due, in part, to their wide applicability. The
richness of the agent metaphor that leads to many different uses of the term is, however, both a
strength and a weakness: its strength lies in the fact that it can be applied in very many different
ways in many situations for different purposes; the weakness is that the term agent is now used so
frequently that there is no commonly accepted notion of what it is that constitutes an agent. This
paper addresses this issue by applying formal methods to provide a defining framework for agent
systems. The Z specification language is used to provide an accessible and unified formal account
of agent systems, allowing us to escape from the terminological chaos that surrounds agents. In
particular, the framework precisely and unambiguously provides meanings for common concepts
and terms, enables alternative models of particular classes of system to be described within it, and
provides a foundation for subsequent development of increasingly more refined concepts.
81 citations
••
TL;DR: A literature review of investigations dealing with operation planning within the area of home care management and a particular issue dealing with the planning of operations related to chemotherapy at home as it is an emergent problem in the French context.
Abstract: Home Care (HC) services provide complex and coordinated medical and paramedical care to patients at their homes. As health care services move into the home setting, the need for developing innovative approaches that improve the efficiency of home care organizations increases. We first conduct a literature review of investigations dealing with operation planning within the area of home care management. We then address a particular issue dealing with the planning of operations related to chemotherapy at home as it is an emergent problem in the French context. Our interest is focused on issues specific to the anti-cancer drug supply chain. We identify various models that can be developed and analyze one of them.
81 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the priority of governance over government is based on the assumption that the political process can be externally influenced through the promotion of institutional changes introduced at the state level and pays less attention to how societal pressures and demands are constitutive of stable and legitimate institutional mechanisms.
Abstract: International state-building has become central to international policy concerns and has marked a clear neo-Wilsonian shift in international thinking, spurred by the leadership of the United States and the European Union. Today's approaches insist on the regulatory role of international institutions and downplay the importance of locally-derived political solutions. This privileging of 'governance' over 'government' is based on the assumption that the political process can be externally influenced through the promotion of institutional changes introduced at the state level and pays less attention to how societal pressures and demands are constitutive of stable and legitimate institutional mechanisms. This article questions this approach and analyses the transformation in the assessment of the importance of the societal sphere. It considers how this shift has been shaped by current understandings of war and conflict, and how the prioritisation of governance has fitted with critical and post-positivist trends in academic thinking in international relations and security studies. The discussion is illustrated with examples drawn largely from the Balkans and the international regime in Bosnia-Herzegovina in particular.
81 citations
Authors
Showing all 3028 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Barbara J. Sahakian | 145 | 612 | 69190 |
Peter B. Jones | 145 | 1857 | 94641 |
Andrew Steptoe | 137 | 1003 | 73431 |
Robert West | 112 | 1061 | 53904 |
Aldo R. Boccaccini | 103 | 1234 | 54155 |
Kevin Morgan | 95 | 655 | 49644 |
Shaogang Gong | 92 | 430 | 31444 |
Thomas A. Buchanan | 91 | 349 | 48865 |
Mauro Perretti | 90 | 497 | 28463 |
Jimmy D. Bell | 88 | 589 | 25983 |
Andrew D. McCulloch | 75 | 358 | 19319 |
Mark S. Goldberg | 73 | 235 | 18067 |
Dimitrios Buhalis | 72 | 316 | 23830 |
Ali Mobasheri | 69 | 370 | 14642 |
Michael E. Boulton | 69 | 331 | 23747 |