scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Westminster

EducationLondon, United Kingdom
About: University of Westminster is a education organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 2944 authors who have published 8426 publications receiving 200236 citations. The organization is also known as: Westminster University & Royal Polytechnic Institution.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue for a paradigm shift in the study of the Internet and digital/social media and argue for an alternative approach that combines critical social media theory, critical digital methods and critical realist social media research ethics.
Abstract: This essay argues for a paradigm shift in the study of the Internet and digital/social media. Big data analytics is the dominant paradigm. It receives large amounts of funding, is administrative and a form of digital positivism. Critical social media research is an alternative approach that combines critical social media theory, critical digital methods and critical-realist social media research ethics. Strengthening the second approach is a material question of power in academia.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article examined the association between acceptance of cosmetic surgery and celebrity worship in a sample of British female undergraduates and found that celebrity worship and participant demographics explained about half of the variance in acceptance of the procedure.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Z specification language is used to provide an accessible and unified formal account of agent systems, allowing us to escape from the terminological chaos that surrounds agents.
Abstract: The use of agents of many different kinds in a variety of fields of computer science and artificial intelligence is increasing rapidly and is due, in part, to their wide applicability. The richness of the agent metaphor that leads to many different uses of the term is, however, both a strength and a weakness: its strength lies in the fact that it can be applied in very many different ways in many situations for different purposes; the weakness is that the term agent is now used so frequently that there is no commonly accepted notion of what it is that constitutes an agent. This paper addresses this issue by applying formal methods to provide a defining framework for agent systems. The Z specification language is used to provide an accessible and unified formal account of agent systems, allowing us to escape from the terminological chaos that surrounds agents. In particular, the framework precisely and unambiguously provides meanings for common concepts and terms, enables alternative models of particular classes of system to be described within it, and provides a foundation for subsequent development of increasingly more refined concepts.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A literature review of investigations dealing with operation planning within the area of home care management and a particular issue dealing with the planning of operations related to chemotherapy at home as it is an emergent problem in the French context.
Abstract: Home Care (HC) services provide complex and coordinated medical and paramedical care to patients at their homes. As health care services move into the home setting, the need for developing innovative approaches that improve the efficiency of home care organizations increases. We first conduct a literature review of investigations dealing with operation planning within the area of home care management. We then address a particular issue dealing with the planning of operations related to chemotherapy at home as it is an emergent problem in the French context. Our interest is focused on issues specific to the anti-cancer drug supply chain. We identify various models that can be developed and analyze one of them.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the priority of governance over government is based on the assumption that the political process can be externally influenced through the promotion of institutional changes introduced at the state level and pays less attention to how societal pressures and demands are constitutive of stable and legitimate institutional mechanisms.
Abstract: International state-building has become central to international policy concerns and has marked a clear neo-Wilsonian shift in international thinking, spurred by the leadership of the United States and the European Union. Today's approaches insist on the regulatory role of international institutions and downplay the importance of locally-derived political solutions. This privileging of 'governance' over 'government' is based on the assumption that the political process can be externally influenced through the promotion of institutional changes introduced at the state level and pays less attention to how societal pressures and demands are constitutive of stable and legitimate institutional mechanisms. This article questions this approach and analyses the transformation in the assessment of the importance of the societal sphere. It considers how this shift has been shaped by current understandings of war and conflict, and how the prioritisation of governance has fitted with critical and post-positivist trends in academic thinking in international relations and security studies. The discussion is illustrated with examples drawn largely from the Balkans and the international regime in Bosnia-Herzegovina in particular.

81 citations


Authors

Showing all 3028 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Barbara J. Sahakian14561269190
Peter B. Jones145185794641
Andrew Steptoe137100373431
Robert West112106153904
Aldo R. Boccaccini103123454155
Kevin Morgan9565549644
Shaogang Gong9243031444
Thomas A. Buchanan9134948865
Mauro Perretti9049728463
Jimmy D. Bell8858925983
Andrew D. McCulloch7535819319
Mark S. Goldberg7323518067
Dimitrios Buhalis7231623830
Ali Mobasheri6937014642
Michael E. Boulton6933123747
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Sheffield
102.9K papers, 3.9M citations

91% related

Cardiff University
82.6K papers, 3M citations

90% related

University of Nottingham
119.6K papers, 4.2M citations

90% related

University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

90% related

Ghent University
111K papers, 3.7M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202334
2022111
2021439
2020501
2019434
2018461