Mojave. x. parsec-scale jet orientation variations and superluminal motion in active galactic nuclei
read more
Citations
The Third Catalog of Active Galactic Nuclei Detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope
The Fermi blazar sequence
MOJAVE. XIII. PARSEC-SCALE AGN JET KINEMATICS ANALYSIS BASED ON 19 YEARS OF VLBA OBSERVATIONS AT 15 GHz
An Accurate Flux Density Scale from 50 MHz to 50 GHz
Kinematics of Parsec-scale Jets of Gamma-Ray Blazars at 43 GHz within the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR Program
References
Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II - Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data
Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems
Least - squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data
The Sixth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
The sixth data release of the sloan digital sky survey
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q2. What is the 2 value for the position angle measurements?
Assuming a typical Gaussian normal error of 2◦ for the position angle measurements (based on the linear regression fit residuals to the monotonic trend sources), the best reduced-χ2 fit values are 1.5 for 0716+714 and 2.5 for 1823+568.
Q3. What is the overall distribution of the components in the plot?
The overall distribution of the components in the plot indicates a positive correlation of speed with core distance for radio galaxies and BL Lac objects, even after partialling out redshift.
Q4. How many components have significant accelerations parallel to the velocity vector?
The authors analyzed 547 components with at least 10 epochs and found 28% to have significant accelerations parallel to the velocity vector and 18% to have significant perpendicular accelerations.
Q5. Why do some jets show a very wide range of position angle?
Some jets (e.g., NRAO 150 = 0355+508) show a very wide range of inner jet position angle and Gaussian component position angles, likely because the viewing angle to the inner jet lies within the opening angle of the (presumably conical) outflow.
Q6. Why is there a deficit of quasar jet components in the region below 1c?
Because of the low space density of bright quasars at low redshift and the fixed angular resolution limit of their survey, there is likely an artificial deficit of quasar jet components in the region below 1c and(A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.)within ∼1 pc of the core, precisely where data are needed to test for a possible trend.
Q7. What was the first fit for the components that had measurements at 10 or more epoch?
For the components that had measurements at 10 or more epochs, the authors also performed a constant acceleration fit (as described inPaper VI), which yielded kinematic quantities at a reference (middle) epoch.
Q8. How many components are considered robust in Paper VI?
The authors have subsequently obtained several closely spaced VLBA epochs and now consider several slow-moving components in these two jets to be robust.
Q9. How did Meisner & Romani obtain z 1.24?
Meisner & Romani (2010) obtain z > 0.38 based on optical non-detection of the host galaxy, and Rau et al. (2012) set an upper limit z < 1.24 based on the photometric redshift technique.
Q10. Why did the authors not analyze all 526 moving components?
Due to the limited number of available epochs, the authors were only able to analyze 311 of the 526 moving components for possible accelerated motion.
Q11. What are the residuals of the kinematic fit?
These residuals represent only estimates of the uncertainty of the fits and are likely underestimates in some cases due to possible errors in component cross-identification and/or a low number of epochs.
Q12. How many uncertainties are there in the FWHM beam?
Based on their previous analysis from Paper VI, the authors estimate the typical uncertainties in the Gaussian centroid positions to be ∼1/5 of the FWHM beam dimensions.
Q13. Why did the authors not compute ejection times for components that had significant vector motion offsets?
The authors did not compute ejection times for components that had significant vector motion offsets (within 2σ of 15◦ or larger), since this would involve an extrapolation ofan unknown acceleration.