scispace - formally typeset
J

James R. Holmquist

Researcher at Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

Publications -  33
Citations -  1773

James R. Holmquist is an academic researcher from Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Peat & Wetland. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 29 publications receiving 1139 citations. Previous affiliations of James R. Holmquist include University of California, Los Angeles.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Database and Synthesis of Northern Peatland Soil Properties and Holocene Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation

Julie Loisel, +60 more
- 03 Jul 2014 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present results from the most comprehensive compilation of Holocene peat soil properties with associated carbon and nitrogen accumulation rates for northern peatlands, which consists of 268 peat cores from 215 sites located north of 45°N.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wetland carbon storage controlled by millennial-scale variation in relative sea-level rise

TL;DR: It is suggested that coastal wetlands characteristic of tectonically stable coastlines have lower carbon storage owing to a lack of accommodation space and that carbon sequestration increases according to the vertical and lateral accommodation space created by RSLR.
Journal ArticleDOI

Latitudinal limits to the predicted increase of the peatland carbon sink with warming

Angela V. Gallego-Sala, +79 more
TL;DR: This article examined the global relationship between peatland carbon accumulation rates during the last millennium and planetary-scale climate space and found a positive relationship between carbon accumulation and cumulative photosynthetically active radiation during the growing season for mid-to high-latitude peatlands in both hemispheres.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon budget of tidal wetlands, estuaries, and shelf waters of Eastern North America

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors constructed a regional carbon budget for Eastern North America using historical data, empirical models, remote-sensing algorithms, and process-based models, showing that coastal carbon budgets should explicitly include tidal wetlands, estuaries, shelf waters and the linkages between them; ignoring any of them may produce a biased picture of coastal carbon cycling.