scispace - formally typeset
R

Rita A. Sakr

Researcher at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications -  51
Citations -  3768

Rita A. Sakr is an academic researcher from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 51 publications receiving 3264 citations. Previous affiliations of Rita A. Sakr include University of Virginia & Columbia University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer

TL;DR: A comprehensive genetic analysis of two independent cohorts of metastatic ER-positive breast tumors and identified mutations in ESR1 affecting the ligand-binding domain (LBD) in 14 of 80 cases that implicate LBD-mutant forms of ER in mediating clinical resistance to hormonal therapy and suggest that more potent ER antagonists may be of substantial therapeutic benefit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pathology of Breast and Ovarian Cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA).

Nasim Mavaddat, +132 more
TL;DR: Pathologic characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCa2 tumors may be useful for improving risk-prediction algorithms and informing clinical strategies for screening and prophylaxis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical Management Factors Contribute to the Decision for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

TL;DR: Data suggest that increasing use of CPM is not associated with increased recognition of patients at high risk for CBC, and treatment factors, such as immediate reconstruction, preoperative MRI, and unsuccessful attempts at breast conservation, are associated withincreased rates of C PM.
Journal ArticleDOI

Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: Revisited

TL;DR: The clinical challenge posed by DCIS, the contribution of the microenvironment and genetic aberrations to the progression from in situ to invasive breast cancer, the emerging evidence of the impact of intra‐tumor genetic heterogeneity on this process, and strategies to combat this heterogeneity are reviewed.