Institution
United States Geological Survey
Government•Reston, Virginia, United States•
About: United States Geological Survey is a government organization based out in Reston, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Groundwater. The organization has 17899 authors who have published 51097 publications receiving 2479125 citations. The organization is also known as: USGS & US Geological Survey.
Topics: Population, Groundwater, Volcano, Aquifer, Sediment
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a frequency-domain scaling model for predicting seismic motions as a function of source strength, which can be applied to any time series having a stochastic character, including ground acceleration, velocity and the oscillator outputs on which response spectra and magnitude are based.
Abstract: Theoretical predictions of seismic motions as a function of source strength are often expressed as frequency-domain scaling models. The observations of interest to strong-motion seismology, however, are usually in the time domain (e.g., various peak motions, including magnitude). The method of simulation presented here makes use of both domains; its essence is to filter a suite of windowed, stochastic time series so that the amplitude spectra are equal, on the average, to the specified spectra. Because of its success in predicting peak and rms accelerations (Hanks and McGuire, 1981), an ω -squared spectrum with a high-frequency cutoff ( f m), in addition to the usual whole-path anelastic attenuation, and with a constant stress parameter (Δ σ ) has been used in the applications of the simulation method. With these assumptions, the model is particularly simple: the scaling with source size depends on only one parameter—seismic moment or, equivalently, moment magnitude. Besides peak acceleration, the model gives a good fit to a number of ground motion amplitude measures derived from previous analyses of hundreds of recordings from earthquakes in western North America, ranging from a moment magnitude of 5.0 to 7.7. These measures of ground motion include peak velocity, Wood-Anderson instrument response, and response spectra. The model also fits peak velocities and peak accelerations for South African earthquakes with moment magnitudes of 0.4 to 2.4 (with f m = 400 Hz and Δ σ = 50 bars, compared to f m = 15 Hz and Δ σ = 100 bars for the western North America data). Remarkably, the model seems to fit all essential aspects of high-frequency ground motions for earthquakes over a very large magnitude range .
Although the simulation method is useful for applications requiring one or more time series, a simpler, less costly method based on various formulas from random vibration theory will often suffice for applications requiring only peak motions. Hanks and McGuire (1981) used such an approach in their prediction of peak acceleration. This paper contains a generalization of their approach; the formulas used depend on the moments (in the statistical sense) of the squared amplitude spectra, and therefore can be applied to any time series having a stochastic character, including ground acceleration, velocity, and the oscillator outputs on which response spectra and magnitude are based .
1,708 citations
••
South Dakota State University1, Natural Resources Canada2, United States Geological Survey3, Boston University4, University of Idaho5, United States Department of Agriculture6, Goddard Space Flight Center7, University of Colorado Boulder8, University of Massachusetts Boston9, Rochester Institute of Technology10, University of California, Los Angeles11, United States Forest Service12, Agricultural Research Service13, Humboldt University of Berlin14, Desert Research Institute15, University of Maryland, College Park16, University of Nebraska–Lincoln17, Geoscience Australia18, Virginia Tech19
TL;DR: Landsat 8, a NASA and USGS collaboration, acquires global moderate-resolution measurements of the Earth's terrestrial and polar regions in the visible, near-infrared, short wave, and thermal infrared as mentioned in this paper.
1,697 citations
••
Yale University1, Université libre de Bruxelles2, University of Hamburg3, Uppsala University4, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources5, United States Geological Survey6, University of Washington7, Stockholm University8, Finnish Environment Institute9, University of Waterloo10, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University11, United States Naval Academy12
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report regional variations in global inland water surface area, dissolved CO2 and gas transfer velocity, and obtain global CO2 evasion rates of 1.8(-0.25) and 0.52 Pg C yr(-1) from lakes and reservoirs, where the upper and lower limits are respectively the 5th and 95th confidence interval percentiles.
Abstract: Carbon dioxide (CO2) transfer from inland waters to the atmosphere, known as CO2 evasion, is a component of the global carbon cycle. Global estimates of CO2 evasion have been hampered, however, by the lack of a framework for estimating the inland water surface area and gas transfer velocity and by the absence of a global CO2 database. Here we report regional variations in global inland water surface area, dissolved CO2 and gas transfer velocity. We obtain global CO2 evasion rates of 1.8(-0.25)(+0.25) petagrams of carbon (Pg C) per year from streams and rivers and 0.32(-0.26)(+0.52) Pg C yr(-1) from lakes and reservoirs, where the upper and lower limits are respectively the 5th and 95th confidence interval percentiles. The resulting global evasion rate of 2.1 Pg C yr(-1) is higher than previous estimates owing to a larger stream and river evasion rate. Our analysis predicts global hotspots in stream and river evasion, with about 70 per cent of the flux occurring over just 20 per cent of the land surface. The source of inland water CO2 is still not known with certainty and new studies are needed to research the mechanisms controlling CO2 evasion globally.
1,696 citations
••
University of Maryland, College Park1, University of Michigan2, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration3, Monash University, Clayton campus4, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University5, University of Idaho6, University of New Mexico7, University of Missouri8, United States Geological Survey9, University of California, Berkeley10, University of Georgia11
TL;DR: The authors of as mentioned in this paper developed a comprehensive database of >37,000 river restoration projects across the United States, which are intended to enhance water quality, manage riparian zones, improve in-stream habitat, allow fish passage, and stabilize stream banks.
Abstract: The authors of this
Policy Forum
developed a comprehensive database of >37,000 river restoration projects across the United States. Such projects have increased exponentially over the past decade with more than a billion dollars spent annually since 1990. Most are intended to enhance water quality, manage riparian zones, improve in-stream habitat, allow fish passage, and stabilize stream banks. Only 10% of project records document any form of project monitoring, and little if any of this information is either appropriate or available for assessing the ecological effectiveness of restoration activities.
1,693 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared the solubility of calcite, aragonite, and vaterite in CO2-H2O solutions between 0 and 90°C using the Debye-Huckel individual ion activity coefficients.
1,673 citations
Authors
Showing all 18026 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Derek R. Lovley | 168 | 582 | 95315 |
Steven Williams | 144 | 1375 | 86712 |
Thomas J. Smith | 140 | 1775 | 113919 |
Jillian F. Banfield | 127 | 562 | 60687 |
Kurunthachalam Kannan | 126 | 820 | 59886 |
J. D. Hansen | 122 | 975 | 76198 |
John P. Giesy | 114 | 1162 | 62790 |
David Pollard | 108 | 438 | 39550 |
Alan Cooper | 108 | 746 | 45772 |
Gordon E. Brown | 100 | 454 | 32152 |
Gerald Schubert | 98 | 614 | 34505 |
Peng Li | 95 | 1548 | 45198 |
Vipin Kumar | 95 | 614 | 59034 |
Susan E. Trumbore | 95 | 337 | 34844 |
Alfred S. McEwen | 92 | 624 | 28730 |