Institution
University of Zurich
Education•Zurich, Switzerland•
About: University of Zurich is a education organization based out in Zurich, Switzerland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 50842 authors who have published 124042 publications receiving 5304521 citations. The organization is also known as: UZH & Uni Zurich.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Context (language use), Gene, Transplantation
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Zurich1, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2, University of California, Berkeley3, University of Oldenburg4, Max Planck Society5, Leibniz University of Hanover6, University of Antwerp7, Oregon State University8, Technische Universität München9, Cornell University10, Newcastle University11, University of Florence12, Weizmann Institute of Science13
TL;DR: In this article, a new generation of experiments and soil carbon models were proposed to predict the SOM response to global warming, and they showed that molecular structure alone alone does not control SOM stability.
Abstract: Globally, soil organic matter (SOM) contains more than three times as much carbon as either the atmosphere or terrestrial vegetation. Yet it remains largely unknown why some SOM persists for millennia whereas other SOM decomposes readily—and this limits our ability to predict how soils will respond to climate change. Recent analytical and experimental advances have demonstrated that molecular structure alone does not control SOM stability: in fact, environmental and biological controls predominate. Here we propose ways to include this understanding in a new generation of experiments and soil carbon models, thereby improving predictions of the SOM response to global warming.
4,219 citations
••
4,138 citations
••
TL;DR: Larger numbers of species are probably needed to reduce temporal variability in ecosystem processes in changing environments and to determine how biodiversity dynamics, ecosystem processes, and abiotic factors interact.
Abstract: The ecological consequences of biodiversity loss have aroused considerable interest and controversy during the past decade. Major advances have been made in describing the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem processes, in identifying functionally important species, and in revealing underlying mechanisms. There is, however, uncertainty as to how results obtained in recent experiments scale up to landscape and regional levels and generalize across ecosystem types and processes. Larger numbers of species are probably needed to reduce temporal variability in ecosystem processes in changing environments. A major future challenge is to determine how biodiversity dynamics, ecosystem processes, and abiotic factors interact.
4,070 citations
••
TL;DR: It is shown how derivatives of the GPW energy functional, namely ionic forces and the Kohn–Sham matrix, can be computed in a consistent way and the computational cost is scaling linearly with the system size, even for condensed phase systems of just a few tens of atoms.
4,047 citations
••
Cornell University1, University of Colorado Denver2, Aix-Marseille University3, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust4, University of Michigan5, Swansea University6, German Cancer Research Center7, Cross Cancer Institute8, University of Zurich9, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre10, Netherlands Cancer Institute11, University of Sydney12, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven13, Complutense University of Madrid14, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre15, University of Paris16, University of Melbourne17, Northwestern University18, Bristol-Myers Squibb19, University of Duisburg-Essen20
TL;DR: Among patients with advanced melanoma, significantly longer overall survival occurred with combination therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with n ivolumAB alone than with ipil optimumab alone.
Abstract: BackgroundNivolumab combined with ipilimumab resulted in longer progression-free survival and a higher objective response rate than ipilimumab alone in a phase 3 trial involving patients with advanced melanoma. We now report 3-year overall survival outcomes in this trial. MethodsWe randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma to receive nivolumab at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram of body weight plus ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks; nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks plus placebo; or ipilimumab at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo, until progression, the occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Randomization was stratified according to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, BRAF mutation status, and metastasis stage. The two primary end points were progression-free survival a...
3,794 citations
Authors
Showing all 51384 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Richard A. Flavell | 231 | 1328 | 205119 |
Peer Bork | 206 | 697 | 245427 |
Thomas C. Südhof | 191 | 653 | 118007 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Ruedi Aebersold | 182 | 879 | 141881 |
Tadamitsu Kishimoto | 181 | 1067 | 130860 |
Stanley B. Prusiner | 168 | 745 | 97528 |
Yang Yang | 164 | 2704 | 144071 |
Tomas Hökfelt | 158 | 1033 | 95979 |
Dan R. Littman | 157 | 426 | 107164 |
Hans Lassmann | 155 | 724 | 79933 |
Matthias Egger | 152 | 901 | 184176 |
Lorenzo Bianchini | 152 | 1516 | 106970 |
Robert M. Strieter | 151 | 612 | 73040 |
Ashok Kumar | 151 | 5654 | 164086 |