scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19.

Andre C. Kalil, +59 more
- 04 Mar 2021 - 
- Vol. 384, Iss: 9, pp 795-807
TLDR
Baricitinib plus remdesivir was superior to remdes Vivir alone in reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with Covid-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation.
Abstract
Background Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with dysregulated inflammation. The effects of combination treatment with baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, plus remdesivir are not known. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating baricitinib plus remdesivir in hospitalized adults with Covid-19. All the patients received remdesivir (≤10 days) and either baricitinib (≤14 days) or placebo (control). The primary outcome was the time to recovery. The key secondary outcome was clinical status at day 15. Results A total of 1033 patients underwent randomization (with 515 assigned to combination treatment and 518 to control). Patients receiving baricitinib had a median time to recovery of 7 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6 to 8), as compared with 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 9) with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.32; P = 0.03), and a 30% higher odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6). Patients receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at enrollment had a time to recovery of 10 days with combination treatment and 18 days with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.08). The 28-day mortality was 5.1% in the combination group and 7.8% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.09). Serious adverse events were less frequent in the combination group than in the control group (16.0% vs. 21.0%; difference, -5.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.8 to -0.3; P = 0.03), as were new infections (5.9% vs. 11.2%; difference, -5.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.7 to -1.9; P = 0.003). Conclusions Baricitinib plus remdesivir was superior to remdesivir alone in reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with Covid-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation. The combination was associated with fewer serious adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04401579.).

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

Medikamentöse Therapie bei COVID-19 mit Bewertung durch die Fachgruppe COVRIIN am Robert-Koch-Institut

TL;DR: In COVID-19 as discussed by the authors, Vertreter der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensivund Notfallmedizin (DIVI), der DeUTschen Gesellschaft für Infektiologie (DGI) and des Ständigen Arbeitskreises der Kompetenzund Behandlungszentren für Krankheiten durch hochpathogene Erreger (STAKOB) beteiligt are be
Journal ArticleDOI

Current and emerging immunomodulators for treatment of SARS-CoV2 infection (COVID-19)

TL;DR: Current therapeutic approaches, including the use of immunomodulators such as corticosteroids, interleukin inhibitors, kinase inhibitors, fluvoxamine, and ivermectin are examined, and the ways that these therapies and others may be used to treat COVID-19 in the future are explored.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Alone or in Combination with Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Penn Class 3 and 4 Cytokine Release Syndrome Complicating COVID-19

TL;DR: While cytokine excess could be an epiphenomenal surrogate for another process, therapeutic strategies have evolved around addressing the excessive cytokine levels complicating a significant fraction of COVID-19 patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Drugs for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and its complications: An update on what we learned in the past 2 years

TL;DR: The report summarizes the available evidence, which supports recommendations from health authorities and panels of experts regarding some drugs and biologics, and highlights drugs that are not recommended, or drugs for which there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against their use.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression

TL;DR: Re-analysis of data from a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of IL-1 blockade (anakinra) in sepsis, showed significant survival benefit in patients with hyperinflammation, without increased adverse events.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19

TL;DR: In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support.
Journal ArticleDOI

Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease.

TL;DR: It is suggested that baricitinib could be trialled, using an appropriate patient population with 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease, to reduce both the viral entry and the inflammation in patients, using endpoints such as the MuLBSTA score, an early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments

TL;DR: Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury, and convalescent plasma treatment reduced mortality in patients with severe pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection.
Related Papers (5)

Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 - Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results.

Hongchao Pan, +73 more