Institution
Federal University of São Paulo
Education•São Paulo, Brazil•
About: Federal University of São Paulo is a education organization based out in São Paulo, Brazil. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 27971 authors who have published 49365 publications receiving 935536 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidade Federal de São Paulo & Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
184 citations
••
TL;DR: An overview of the use of chitosans in nanostructured films produced with the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) or the electrostatic layer-by-layer (LbL) techniques, with emphasis on their possible applications.
184 citations
••
TL;DR: The purpose of this report is to provide a description in accordance with the Rules of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision) and the correct name of this taxon, at the rank of subspecies, is Mycobacterium abscessus subsp.
Abstract: The names ‘Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus’ and ‘Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense’, proposed by Leao et al. (2009, J Clin Microbiol
47, 2691–2698), cannot be validly published. The purpose of this report is to provide a description in accordance with the Rules of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision). Moreover, the proposal of the name ‘Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense’ is contrary to Rule 38 and the correct name of this taxon, at the rank of subspecies, is Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii comb. nov. A description of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus subsp. nov. and an emended description of Mycobacterium abscessus are also given.
183 citations
••
Emory University1, Université libre de Bruxelles2, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research3, Hebron University4, Rush University Medical Center5, Federal University of São Paulo6, St James's University Hospital7, New York University8, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart9, University of California, San Francisco10, Utrecht University11, Brown University12, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust13
TL;DR: While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression ofSepsis.
Abstract: To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome and underlying causes of sepsis and septic shock. A consensus committee of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine was convened at the annual meetings of both societies. Subgroups had teleconference and electronic-based discussion. The entire committee iteratively developed the entire document and recommendations. Each committee member independently gave their top five priorities for sepsis research. A total of 88 suggestions (ESM 1 - supplemental table 1) were grouped into categories by the committee co-chairs, leading to the formation of seven subgroups: infection, fluids and vasoactive agents, adjunctive therapy, administration/epidemiology, scoring/identification, post-intensive care unit, and basic/translational science. Each subgroup had teleconferences to go over each priority followed by formal voting within each subgroup. The entire committee also voted on top priorities across all subgroups except for basic/translational science. The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Of these, the top six clinical priorities were identified and include the following questions: (1) can targeted/personalized/precision medicine approaches determine which therapies will work for which patients at which times?; (2) what are ideal endpoints for volume resuscitation and how should volume resuscitation be titrated?; (3) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice?; (4) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock?; (5) what are the predictors of sepsis long-term morbidity and mortality?; and (6) what information identifies organ dysfunction? While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression of sepsis. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.
182 citations
••
TL;DR: The T. cruzi mucins (TcMUC), a group of highly glycosylated GPI-anchored proteins rich in Thr, Ser, and Pro residues, are expressed in high copy numbers in both insect and mammalian stages of the parasite.
182 citations
Authors
Showing all 28240 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Majid Ezzati | 133 | 443 | 137171 |
Christian Guilleminault | 133 | 897 | 68844 |
Jean Rivier | 133 | 769 | 73919 |
Myron M. Levine | 123 | 789 | 60865 |
Werner Seeger | 114 | 1113 | 57464 |
Katherine L. Tucker | 106 | 683 | 39404 |
Michael Bader | 103 | 735 | 37525 |
Paulo A. Lotufo | 89 | 622 | 100527 |
Fernando Q. Cunha | 88 | 682 | 31501 |
Paul R. Sanberg | 87 | 635 | 29745 |
Harold A. Chapman | 87 | 191 | 26617 |
Ricardo T. Gazzinelli | 86 | 340 | 28233 |
Carlito B. Lebrilla | 86 | 495 | 25415 |
Roger S. McIntyre | 85 | 807 | 32040 |
Sergio Tufik | 85 | 1424 | 35174 |