Institution
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Facility•Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States•
About: Oak Ridge National Laboratory is a facility organization based out in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Neutron & Ion. The organization has 31868 authors who have published 73724 publications receiving 2633689 citations. The organization is also known as: ORNL.
Topics: Neutron, Ion, Scattering, Neutron scattering, Microstructure
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the gap between the discharge-charge curves of cells with as-deposited nanocrystalline Li1+xMn2−yO4 cathodes is due to a true hysteresis as opposed to a kinetically hindered relaxation observed with the highly crystalline films.
1,000 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of changing the grain (the first level of spatial resolution possible with a given data set) and extent (the total area of the study) of landscape data on observed spatial patterns and to identify some general rules for comparing measures obtained at different scales.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to observe the effects of changing the grain (the first level of spatial resolution possible with a given data set) and extent (the total area of the study) of landscape data on observed spatial patterns and to identify some general rules for comparing measures obtained at different scales. Simple random maps, maps with contagion (i.e., clusters of the same land cover type), and actual landscape data from USGS land use (LUDA) data maps were used in the analyses. Landscape patterns were compared using indices measuring diversity (H), dominance (D) and contagion (C). Rare land cover types were lost as grain became coarser. This loss could be predicted analytically for random maps with two land cover types, and it was observed in actual landscapes as grain was increased experimentally. However, the rate of loss was influenced by the spatial pattern. Land cover types that were clumped disappeared slowly or were retained with increasing grain, whereas cover types that were dispersed were lost rapidly. The diversity index decreased linearly with increasing grain size, but dominance and contagion did not show a linear relationship. The indices D and C increased with increasing extent, but H exhibited a variable response. The indices were sensitive to the number (m) of cover types observed in the data set and the fraction of the landscape occupied by each cover type (P
k); both m and P
kvaried with grain and extent. Qualitative and quantitative changes in measurements across spatial scales will differ depending on how scale is defined. Characterizing the relationships between ecological measurements and the grain or extent of the data may make it possible to predict or correct for the loss of information with changes in spatial scale.
994 citations
••
Oak Ridge National Laboratory1, University of Antwerp2, Tuscia University3, United States Department of Agriculture4, North Carolina State University5, Duke University6, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign7, Boston University8, Michigan Technological University9, Bangor University10, National Research Council11
TL;DR: The surprising consistency of response across diverse sites provides a benchmark to evaluate predictions of ecosystem and global models and allows us to focus on unresolved questions about carbon partitioning and retention, and spatial variation in NPP response caused by availability of other growth limiting resources.
Abstract: Climate change predictions derived from coupled carbon-climate models are highly dependent on assumptions about feedbacks between the biosphere and atmosphere. One critical feedback occurs if C uptake by the biosphere increases in response to the fossil-fuel driven increase in atmospheric [CO2] (“CO2 fertilization”), thereby slowing the rate of increase in atmospheric [CO2]. Carbon exchanges between the terrestrial biosphere and atmosphere are often first represented in models as net primary productivity (NPP). However, the contribution of CO2 fertilization to the future global C cycle has been uncertain, especially in forest ecosystems that dominate global NPP, and models that include a feedback between terrestrial biosphere metabolism and atmospheric [CO2] are poorly constrained by experimental evidence. We analyzed the response of NPP to elevated CO2 (≈550 ppm) in four free-air CO2 enrichment experiments in forest stands. We show that the response of forest NPP to elevated [CO2] is highly conserved across a broad range of productivity, with a stimulation at the median of 23 ± 2%. At low leaf area indices, a large portion of the response was attributable to increased light absorption, but as leaf area indices increased, the response to elevated [CO2] was wholly caused by increased light-use efficiency. The surprising consistency of response across diverse sites provides a benchmark to evaluate predictions of ecosystem and global models and allows us now to focus on unresolved questions about carbon partitioning and retention, and spatial variation in NPP response caused by availability of other growth limiting resources.
988 citations
•
977 citations
Authors
Showing all 32112 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Zhong Lin Wang | 245 | 2529 | 259003 |
Hyun-Chul Kim | 176 | 4076 | 183227 |
Bradley Cox | 169 | 2150 | 156200 |
Charles M. Lieber | 165 | 521 | 132811 |
Wei Li | 158 | 1855 | 124748 |
Joseph Jankovic | 153 | 1146 | 93840 |
James M. Tiedje | 150 | 688 | 102287 |
Peter Lang | 140 | 1136 | 98592 |
Andrew G. Clark | 140 | 823 | 123333 |
Josh Moss | 139 | 1019 | 89255 |
Robert H. Purcell | 139 | 666 | 70366 |
Ad Bax | 138 | 486 | 97112 |
George C. Schatz | 137 | 1155 | 94910 |
Daniel Thomas | 134 | 846 | 84224 |
Jerry M. Melillo | 134 | 383 | 68894 |