Institution
Research Triangle Park
Nonprofit•Durham, North Carolina, United States•
About: Research Triangle Park is a nonprofit organization based out in Durham, North Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Receptor. The organization has 24961 authors who have published 35800 publications receiving 1684504 citations. The organization is also known as: RTP.
Topics: Population, Receptor, Health care, Gene, Environmental exposure
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Research Triangle Park1, Harvard University2, Yale University3, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation4, University of Pennsylvania5, Columbia University6, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill7, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center8, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences9, University of Southern California10, Janssen Pharmaceutica11, Johnson & Johnson12, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center13
TL;DR: The goal of this article is to articulate the 4 central challenges facing clinical research at present--public participation, information systems, workforce training, and funding; to make recommendations about how they might be addressed by particular stakeholders; and to invite a broader, participatory dialogue with a view to improving the overall performance of the US clinical research enterprise.
Abstract: Medical scientists and public health policy makers are increasingly concerned that the scientific discoveries of the past generation are failing to be translated efficiently into tangible human benefit. This concern has generated several initiatives, including the Clinical Research Roundtable at the Institute of Medicine, which first convened in June 2000. Representatives from a diverse group of stakeholders in the nation’s clinical research enterprise have collaborated to address the issues it faces. The context of clinical research is increasingly encumbered by high costs, slow results, lack of funding, regulatory burdens, fragmented infrastructure, incompatible databases, and a shortage of qualified investigators and willing participants. These factors have contributed to 2 major obstacles, or translational blocks: impeding the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical studies and of clinical studies into medical practice and health decision making in systems of care. Considering data from across the entire health care system, it has become clear that these 2 translational blocks can be removed only by the collaborative efforts of multiple system stakeholders. The goal of this article is to articulate the 4 central challenges facing clinical research at present—public participation, information systems, workforce training, and funding; to make recommendations about how they might be addressed by particular stakeholders; and to invite a broader, participatory dialogue with a viewtoimprovingtheoverallperformanceoftheUSclinicalresearchenterprise.
1,142 citations
TL;DR: Current understanding of replication fidelity is reviewed, with emphasis on structural and biochemical studies of DNA polymerases that provide new insights into the importance of hydrogen bonding, base pair geometry, and substrate-induced conformational changes to fidelity.
1,137 citations
Case Western Reserve University1, Emory University2, National Institutes of Health3, University of Alabama at Birmingham4, Yale University5, Harvard University6, University of Miami7, University of Cincinnati8, University of Tennessee Health Science Center9, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center10, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis11, Brown University12, University of New Mexico13, Wayne State University14, Stanford University15, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston16, Research Triangle Park17
TL;DR: There have been no significant increases in survival without neonatal and long-term morbidity among VLBW infants between 1997 and 2002, and it is speculated that to improve survival without morbidity requires determining, disseminating, and applying best practices using therapies currently available, and also identifying new strategies and interventions.
1,135 citations
TL;DR: The comparison of the new strategy and a standard clinical processor shows large improvements in the scores of speech reception tests for all subjects, which have important implications for the treatment of deafness and for minimal representations of speech at the auditory periphery.
Abstract: HIGH levels of speech recognition have been achieved with a new sound processing strategy for multielectrode cochlear implants. A cochlear implant system consists of one or more implanted electrodes for direct electrical activation of the auditory nerve, an external speech processor that transforms a microphone input into stimuli for each electrode, and a transcutaneous (rf-link) or percutaneous (direct) connection between the processor and the electrodes. We report here the comparison of the new strategy and a standard clinical processor. The standard compressed analogue (CA) processor presented analogue waveforms simultaneously to all electrodes, whereas the new continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy presented brief pulses to each electrode in a nonoverlapping sequence. Seven experienced implant users, selected for their excellent performance with the CA processor, participated as subjects. The new strategy produced large improvements in the scores of speech reception tests for all subjects. These results have important implications for the treatment of deafness and for minimal representations of speech at the auditory periphery.
1,131 citations
TL;DR: It is shown that indomethacin binds and activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), a ligand-activated transcription factor known to play a pivotal role in adipogenesis, and several other NSAIDs are also PPARγ ligands and induce adipocyte differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells.
1,125 citations
Authors
Showing all 25006 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas G. Altman | 253 | 1001 | 680344 |
| Lewis C. Cantley | 196 | 748 | 169037 |
| Ronald Klein | 194 | 1305 | 149140 |
| Daniel J. Jacob | 162 | 656 | 76530 |
| Christopher P. Cannon | 151 | 1118 | 108906 |
| James B. Meigs | 147 | 574 | 115899 |
| Lawrence Corey | 146 | 773 | 78105 |
| Jeremy K. Nicholson | 141 | 773 | 80275 |
| Paul M. Matthews | 140 | 617 | 88802 |
| Herbert Y. Meltzer | 137 | 1148 | 81371 |
| Charles J. Yeo | 136 | 672 | 76424 |
| Benjamin F. Cravatt | 131 | 666 | 61932 |
| Timothy R. Billiar | 131 | 838 | 66133 |
| Peter Brown | 129 | 908 | 68853 |
| King K. Holmes | 124 | 606 | 56192 |